{"title":"没有正式保险的保险:埃塞俄比亚农村社会资本的缓冲作用","authors":"Abraham Seyoum Gonfa , Jonse Bane Boka , Getnet Alemu Zewdu","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The literature is unclear whether social capital can insure effectively against shocks. We provide evidence from rural Ethiopia, a setting characterized by prevalent shocks, lack of formal insurance markets, and functioning informal traditional institutions, using four waves of household panel surveys with over 6000 observations. We measure social capital as the social network-based resources available to rural households via local informal institutions, alternatively measured as network size, network diversity, and simple membership in institutions. Fixed effect estimation results show that the buffering role of social capital extends beyond insurance against idiosyncratic shocks, with variation across welfare and social capital measures. Social capital helps protect against multiple and simultaneous shocks, buffering shortfalls in not only total consumption but also food and consumables consumption. Rural households thus benefit from informal insurance in local institutions in the absence of formal insurance markets. Rural insurance policies and efforts to address food insecurity and rural development challenges should consider resources embedded in these institutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 102880"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insurance without formal insurance: the buffering role of social capital in rural Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Abraham Seyoum Gonfa , Jonse Bane Boka , Getnet Alemu Zewdu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The literature is unclear whether social capital can insure effectively against shocks. We provide evidence from rural Ethiopia, a setting characterized by prevalent shocks, lack of formal insurance markets, and functioning informal traditional institutions, using four waves of household panel surveys with over 6000 observations. We measure social capital as the social network-based resources available to rural households via local informal institutions, alternatively measured as network size, network diversity, and simple membership in institutions. Fixed effect estimation results show that the buffering role of social capital extends beyond insurance against idiosyncratic shocks, with variation across welfare and social capital measures. Social capital helps protect against multiple and simultaneous shocks, buffering shortfalls in not only total consumption but also food and consumables consumption. Rural households thus benefit from informal insurance in local institutions in the absence of formal insurance markets. Rural insurance policies and efforts to address food insecurity and rural development challenges should consider resources embedded in these institutions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Policy\",\"volume\":\"134 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102880\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225000843\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225000843","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Insurance without formal insurance: the buffering role of social capital in rural Ethiopia
The literature is unclear whether social capital can insure effectively against shocks. We provide evidence from rural Ethiopia, a setting characterized by prevalent shocks, lack of formal insurance markets, and functioning informal traditional institutions, using four waves of household panel surveys with over 6000 observations. We measure social capital as the social network-based resources available to rural households via local informal institutions, alternatively measured as network size, network diversity, and simple membership in institutions. Fixed effect estimation results show that the buffering role of social capital extends beyond insurance against idiosyncratic shocks, with variation across welfare and social capital measures. Social capital helps protect against multiple and simultaneous shocks, buffering shortfalls in not only total consumption but also food and consumables consumption. Rural households thus benefit from informal insurance in local institutions in the absence of formal insurance markets. Rural insurance policies and efforts to address food insecurity and rural development challenges should consider resources embedded in these institutions.
期刊介绍:
Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies.
Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.