荷兰背景下积极支持的定性过程评价:对实施和背景因素的调查。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Aniek van Herwaarden, Nienke C Peters-Scheffer, Vaso Totsika, Robert Didden
{"title":"荷兰背景下积极支持的定性过程评价:对实施和背景因素的调查。","authors":"Aniek van Herwaarden, Nienke C Peters-Scheffer, Vaso Totsika, Robert Didden","doi":"10.3109/13668250.2025.2503101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A qualitative process evaluation was carried out to investigate implementation of Active Support in services for people with mild and moderate intellectual disability in the Netherlands, and to identify contextual factors that may contribute to variation in implementation, perceived effectiveness, and pathways to successful outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders who were involved with the Active Support implementation. Interviews with practice leaders (<i>n</i> = 6), Active Support trainers (<i>n</i> = 4), direct support staff (<i>n</i> = 8), and residents with mild intellectual disabilities (<i>n</i> = 7) were analysed through a thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Organisational and managerial preparation appeared to lead to positive Active Support training experiences, in turn leading to behavioural changes in staff, resulting in resident wellbeing. Practice leaders' coaching, staff collaboration, and additional staffing resources through volunteers and students facilitated implementation of Active Support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identification of these factors enhances our understanding of the dynamic process of Active Support implementation in a Dutch context.</p>","PeriodicalId":51466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A qualitative process evaluation of Active Support in the Dutch context: An investigation of implementation and contextual factors.\",\"authors\":\"Aniek van Herwaarden, Nienke C Peters-Scheffer, Vaso Totsika, Robert Didden\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/13668250.2025.2503101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A qualitative process evaluation was carried out to investigate implementation of Active Support in services for people with mild and moderate intellectual disability in the Netherlands, and to identify contextual factors that may contribute to variation in implementation, perceived effectiveness, and pathways to successful outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders who were involved with the Active Support implementation. Interviews with practice leaders (<i>n</i> = 6), Active Support trainers (<i>n</i> = 4), direct support staff (<i>n</i> = 8), and residents with mild intellectual disabilities (<i>n</i> = 7) were analysed through a thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Organisational and managerial preparation appeared to lead to positive Active Support training experiences, in turn leading to behavioural changes in staff, resulting in resident wellbeing. Practice leaders' coaching, staff collaboration, and additional staffing resources through volunteers and students facilitated implementation of Active Support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identification of these factors enhances our understanding of the dynamic process of Active Support implementation in a Dutch context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2025.2503101\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2025.2503101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究进行了定性过程评估,以调查荷兰对轻度和中度智力残疾人士服务中积极支持的实施情况,并确定可能导致实施、感知有效性和成功结果途径变化的背景因素。方法:对参与积极支持实施的利益相关者进行定性半结构化访谈。通过专题分析对实践领导(n = 6)、积极支持培训师(n = 4)、直接支持人员(n = 8)和轻度智障住院医师(n = 7)的访谈进行分析。结果:组织和管理准备似乎导致积极的积极支持培训经验,反过来导致员工的行为改变,导致居民的福祉。实践领导者的指导、员工协作以及通过志愿者和学生提供的额外人员资源促进了积极支持的实施。结论:这些因素的识别增强了我们对荷兰背景下积极支持实施的动态过程的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A qualitative process evaluation of Active Support in the Dutch context: An investigation of implementation and contextual factors.

Background: A qualitative process evaluation was carried out to investigate implementation of Active Support in services for people with mild and moderate intellectual disability in the Netherlands, and to identify contextual factors that may contribute to variation in implementation, perceived effectiveness, and pathways to successful outcomes.

Method: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders who were involved with the Active Support implementation. Interviews with practice leaders (n = 6), Active Support trainers (n = 4), direct support staff (n = 8), and residents with mild intellectual disabilities (n = 7) were analysed through a thematic analysis.

Results: Organisational and managerial preparation appeared to lead to positive Active Support training experiences, in turn leading to behavioural changes in staff, resulting in resident wellbeing. Practice leaders' coaching, staff collaboration, and additional staffing resources through volunteers and students facilitated implementation of Active Support.

Conclusions: Identification of these factors enhances our understanding of the dynamic process of Active Support implementation in a Dutch context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability (formerly the Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities) is the official journal of the Australasian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability (ASSID). JIDD is an international, multidisciplinary journal in the field of intellectual and developmental disability. The journal publishes original qualitative and quantitative research papers, literature reviews, conceptual articles, brief reports, case reports, data briefs, and opinions and perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信