自杀中的决策平衡:一个积极的推理解释。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Valery Krupnik
{"title":"自杀中的决策平衡:一个积极的推理解释。","authors":"Valery Krupnik","doi":"10.1080/13546805.2025.2504604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Suicide is a behaviour whose motivation is challenging to explain as it can neither be rewarded nor punished since the agent no longer exists. The conventional explanation is that suicide is motivated as an escape from unresolvable psychological pain. However, despite suicide's high availability, its rates are very low (about 0.014% in the US). This speaks to high ambivalence as an essential feature of the suicidal mind.<b>Method:</b> To explicate the ambivalence of the suicidal mind, suicide has recently been framed within the active inference framework (AIF). AIF appears to be appropriate for conceptualising suicide because it is a theory of choice behaviour under uncertainty that, in suicide, cannot be resolved or, validated by experience. Moreover, AIF is based on the free-energy principle, which is proposed as a principle underwriting the very existence of sentient systems.<b>Results:</b> In this paper, we frame suicidal decision-making as the balance between the expected free energy of survival vs. suicide action policies. Based on this frame, we develop intuitions about the dynamics of suicidal decision-making. These intuitions are then proposed as guides for future research into suicidal decisions as well as suicide prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":51277,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision-making balance in suicide: an active inference account.\",\"authors\":\"Valery Krupnik\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13546805.2025.2504604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Suicide is a behaviour whose motivation is challenging to explain as it can neither be rewarded nor punished since the agent no longer exists. The conventional explanation is that suicide is motivated as an escape from unresolvable psychological pain. However, despite suicide's high availability, its rates are very low (about 0.014% in the US). This speaks to high ambivalence as an essential feature of the suicidal mind.<b>Method:</b> To explicate the ambivalence of the suicidal mind, suicide has recently been framed within the active inference framework (AIF). AIF appears to be appropriate for conceptualising suicide because it is a theory of choice behaviour under uncertainty that, in suicide, cannot be resolved or, validated by experience. Moreover, AIF is based on the free-energy principle, which is proposed as a principle underwriting the very existence of sentient systems.<b>Results:</b> In this paper, we frame suicidal decision-making as the balance between the expected free energy of survival vs. suicide action policies. Based on this frame, we develop intuitions about the dynamics of suicidal decision-making. These intuitions are then proposed as guides for future research into suicidal decisions as well as suicide prevention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2025.2504604\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2025.2504604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:自杀是一种动机很难解释的行为,因为它既不能奖励也不能惩罚,因为代理人已经不存在了。传统的解释是,自杀的动机是为了逃避无法解决的心理痛苦。然而,尽管自杀的可能性很高,但其发生率非常低(在美国约为0.014%)。这说明高度矛盾心理是自杀心理的基本特征。方法:为了解释自杀心理的矛盾心理,自杀最近被纳入了主动推理框架(AIF)。AIF似乎适合于将自杀概念化,因为它是一种不确定性下的选择行为理论,在自杀中,无法解决或通过经验验证。此外,AIF是建立在自由能原理的基础上的,自由能原理被认为是支持有感知系统存在的原理。结果:在本文中,我们将自杀决策框架为生存预期自由能与自杀行动政策之间的平衡。基于这一框架,我们发展了关于自杀决策动力学的直觉。然后,这些直觉被提出作为未来研究自杀决定和自杀预防的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decision-making balance in suicide: an active inference account.

Introduction: Suicide is a behaviour whose motivation is challenging to explain as it can neither be rewarded nor punished since the agent no longer exists. The conventional explanation is that suicide is motivated as an escape from unresolvable psychological pain. However, despite suicide's high availability, its rates are very low (about 0.014% in the US). This speaks to high ambivalence as an essential feature of the suicidal mind.Method: To explicate the ambivalence of the suicidal mind, suicide has recently been framed within the active inference framework (AIF). AIF appears to be appropriate for conceptualising suicide because it is a theory of choice behaviour under uncertainty that, in suicide, cannot be resolved or, validated by experience. Moreover, AIF is based on the free-energy principle, which is proposed as a principle underwriting the very existence of sentient systems.Results: In this paper, we frame suicidal decision-making as the balance between the expected free energy of survival vs. suicide action policies. Based on this frame, we develop intuitions about the dynamics of suicidal decision-making. These intuitions are then proposed as guides for future research into suicidal decisions as well as suicide prevention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (CNP) publishes high quality empirical and theoretical papers in the multi-disciplinary field of cognitive neuropsychiatry. Specifically the journal promotes the study of cognitive processes underlying psychological and behavioural abnormalities, including psychotic symptoms, with and without organic brain disease. Since 1996, CNP has published original papers, short reports, case studies and theoretical and empirical reviews in fields of clinical and cognitive neuropsychiatry, which have a bearing on the understanding of normal cognitive processes. Relevant research from cognitive neuroscience, cognitive neuropsychology and clinical populations will also be considered. There are no page charges and we are able to offer free color printing where color is necessary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信