智障人士与非智障人士自决权量表葡萄牙语翻译的因素结构:验证性分析。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Clarissa Moreira, Celeste Simões, André Oliveira, Armanda Pereira, Pedro Rosário, Mayumi Hagiwara, Karrie A Shogren, Sofia Santos
{"title":"智障人士与非智障人士自决权量表葡萄牙语翻译的因素结构:验证性分析。","authors":"Clarissa Moreira, Celeste Simões, André Oliveira, Armanda Pereira, Pedro Rosário, Mayumi Hagiwara, Karrie A Shogren, Sofia Santos","doi":"10.1111/jir.13249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-determination has seen increasing interest in literature worldwide, in terms of its contextualisation, operationalisation and assessment. Developing sound and robust instruments will enable valid assessment both within individual countries and in cross-cultural comparisons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The new Self-Determination Inventory (SDI) was translated and adapted into Portuguese, for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and our goal was to analyse the SDI Portuguese Translation's factorial structure. The inventory was administered to 408 participants, between 13 and 73 years old (27 ± 13.6), 246 females and 162 males, with (n = 146) and without IDD (n = 262). Factor structure, measurement invariance and latent difference between persons with and without IDD were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The confirmatory factor analysis supported the SDI Portuguese Translations' psychometric properties. The data fit a unidimensional model, indicating that the 21 items represent the construct better than a three-factor model. The measurement invariance across groups confirms that the latent construct can be measured and the assessment used with both groups. However, participants with IDD experience greater variability in scores and tend to report lower levels of self-determination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings provide support for the use of SDI Portuguese Translation for persons with and without IDD. Implications for research and practice are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Factor Structure of the Self-Determination Inventory Portuguese Translation for Persons With and Without Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Confirmatory Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Clarissa Moreira, Celeste Simões, André Oliveira, Armanda Pereira, Pedro Rosário, Mayumi Hagiwara, Karrie A Shogren, Sofia Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jir.13249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-determination has seen increasing interest in literature worldwide, in terms of its contextualisation, operationalisation and assessment. Developing sound and robust instruments will enable valid assessment both within individual countries and in cross-cultural comparisons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The new Self-Determination Inventory (SDI) was translated and adapted into Portuguese, for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and our goal was to analyse the SDI Portuguese Translation's factorial structure. The inventory was administered to 408 participants, between 13 and 73 years old (27 ± 13.6), 246 females and 162 males, with (n = 146) and without IDD (n = 262). Factor structure, measurement invariance and latent difference between persons with and without IDD were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The confirmatory factor analysis supported the SDI Portuguese Translations' psychometric properties. The data fit a unidimensional model, indicating that the 21 items represent the construct better than a three-factor model. The measurement invariance across groups confirms that the latent construct can be measured and the assessment used with both groups. However, participants with IDD experience greater variability in scores and tend to report lower levels of self-determination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings provide support for the use of SDI Portuguese Translation for persons with and without IDD. Implications for research and practice are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.13249\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.13249","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自决在世界范围内的文学中越来越受到关注,包括语境化、操作化和评估。发展健全和有力的工具将使在个别国家内部和跨文化比较中进行有效评估成为可能。方法:将新的自我决定量表(SDI)翻译成葡萄牙语,用于智力和发育障碍(IDD)的人群,我们的目标是分析SDI葡萄牙语译本的析因结构。调查对象408人,年龄13 ~ 73岁(27±13.6),女性246人,男性162人,有IDD (n = 146)和无IDD (n = 262)。分析了缺乏症患者和非缺乏症患者的因素结构、测量不变性和潜在差异。结果:验证性因子分析支持SDI葡萄牙语翻译的心理测量特征。数据拟合一维模型,表明21个项目比三因素模型更能代表结构。各组间的测量不变性证实了潜在构念可以被测量,并且两组都可以使用评估。然而,患有缺乏症的参与者在得分上的差异更大,并且倾向于报告较低的自我决定水平。结论:研究结果为患有和不患有IDD的人使用SDI葡萄牙语翻译提供了支持。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Factor Structure of the Self-Determination Inventory Portuguese Translation for Persons With and Without Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Confirmatory Analysis.

Background: Self-determination has seen increasing interest in literature worldwide, in terms of its contextualisation, operationalisation and assessment. Developing sound and robust instruments will enable valid assessment both within individual countries and in cross-cultural comparisons.

Methods: The new Self-Determination Inventory (SDI) was translated and adapted into Portuguese, for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and our goal was to analyse the SDI Portuguese Translation's factorial structure. The inventory was administered to 408 participants, between 13 and 73 years old (27 ± 13.6), 246 females and 162 males, with (n = 146) and without IDD (n = 262). Factor structure, measurement invariance and latent difference between persons with and without IDD were analysed.

Results: The confirmatory factor analysis supported the SDI Portuguese Translations' psychometric properties. The data fit a unidimensional model, indicating that the 21 items represent the construct better than a three-factor model. The measurement invariance across groups confirms that the latent construct can be measured and the assessment used with both groups. However, participants with IDD experience greater variability in scores and tend to report lower levels of self-determination.

Conclusions: Findings provide support for the use of SDI Portuguese Translation for persons with and without IDD. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信