相对脂肪量在胆结石风险评估中的作用:来自NHANES 2017-2020调查的结果。

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Frontiers in Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnut.2025.1575524
Li Wang, Shan Cao, Guodong Song
{"title":"相对脂肪量在胆结石风险评估中的作用:来自NHANES 2017-2020调查的结果。","authors":"Li Wang, Shan Cao, Guodong Song","doi":"10.3389/fnut.2025.1575524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gallstones are a prevalent condition that can lead to significant morbidity and healthcare costs. Relative fat mass (RFM), as a potential marker of body fat distribution, may offer insights beyond traditional metrics like body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference. This study aims to investigate the association between RFM and gallstone prevalence in the U.S. population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study cohort comprised 6,881 participants obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted between 2017 and 2020. Participants were stratified into quartiles (Q1-Q4) based on their RFM. To evaluate the associations, multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to assess odds ratios (OR) for gallstone risk across different quartiles of RFM. Additionally, restricted cubic spline analysis was conducted to ascertain the relationship trend while subgroup analyses examined interactions based on age, sex, race, education level, and lifestyle factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed significant associations for participants within the higher RFM quartiles (Q3 and Q4), with ORs of 2.58 (95% CI: 1.65, 4.04) and 6.30 (95% CI: 3.63, 10.93), respectively, compared to Q1. The findings consistently indicated that RFM, particularly in Q4, is a strong predictor of gallstone risk, demonstrating superior predictive performance relative to waist circumference and BMI, as evidenced by an AUC of 0.702.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated RFM is a noteworthy predictor of gallstone risk in the studied population, suggesting its potential utility in clinical risk assessment frameworks. Future research should focus on elucidating the underlying mechanisms driving this association and exploring RFM's applicability as a pragmatic tool in clinical practice for gallstone risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":12473,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nutrition","volume":"12 ","pages":"1575524"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075137/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of relative fat mass in gallstone risk assessment: findings from the NHANES 2017-2020 survey.\",\"authors\":\"Li Wang, Shan Cao, Guodong Song\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnut.2025.1575524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gallstones are a prevalent condition that can lead to significant morbidity and healthcare costs. Relative fat mass (RFM), as a potential marker of body fat distribution, may offer insights beyond traditional metrics like body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference. This study aims to investigate the association between RFM and gallstone prevalence in the U.S. population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study cohort comprised 6,881 participants obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted between 2017 and 2020. Participants were stratified into quartiles (Q1-Q4) based on their RFM. To evaluate the associations, multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to assess odds ratios (OR) for gallstone risk across different quartiles of RFM. Additionally, restricted cubic spline analysis was conducted to ascertain the relationship trend while subgroup analyses examined interactions based on age, sex, race, education level, and lifestyle factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed significant associations for participants within the higher RFM quartiles (Q3 and Q4), with ORs of 2.58 (95% CI: 1.65, 4.04) and 6.30 (95% CI: 3.63, 10.93), respectively, compared to Q1. The findings consistently indicated that RFM, particularly in Q4, is a strong predictor of gallstone risk, demonstrating superior predictive performance relative to waist circumference and BMI, as evidenced by an AUC of 0.702.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated RFM is a noteworthy predictor of gallstone risk in the studied population, suggesting its potential utility in clinical risk assessment frameworks. Future research should focus on elucidating the underlying mechanisms driving this association and exploring RFM's applicability as a pragmatic tool in clinical practice for gallstone risk stratification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1575524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12075137/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1575524\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1575524","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胆结石是一种常见的疾病,可导致显著的发病率和医疗费用。相对脂肪量(RFM)作为身体脂肪分布的潜在标志,可能提供比身体质量指数(BMI)和腰围等传统指标更深刻的见解。本研究旨在调查美国人群中RFM与胆结石患病率之间的关系。方法:研究队列包括6881名来自2017年至2020年进行的国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的参与者。参与者根据他们的RFM被分成四分位数(Q1-Q4)。为了评估相关性,采用多变量logistic回归分析来评估RFM不同四分位数中胆结石风险的比值比(OR)。此外,进行了限制性三次样条分析以确定关系趋势,而亚组分析则检查了基于年龄、性别、种族、教育水平和生活方式因素的相互作用。结果:分析显示,与Q1相比,较高RFM四分位数(Q3和Q4)内的参与者存在显著关联,or分别为2.58 (95% CI: 1.65, 4.04)和6.30 (95% CI: 3.63, 10.93)。研究结果一致表明,RFM,特别是在第四季度,是胆结石风险的一个强有力的预测指标,相对于腰围和BMI,显示出更好的预测性能,如AUC为0.702所证明的那样。结论:RFM升高是研究人群中胆结石风险的重要预测因子,提示其在临床风险评估框架中的潜在效用。未来的研究应侧重于阐明驱动这种关联的潜在机制,并探索RFM作为胆结石风险分层临床实践中的实用工具的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of relative fat mass in gallstone risk assessment: findings from the NHANES 2017-2020 survey.

Background: Gallstones are a prevalent condition that can lead to significant morbidity and healthcare costs. Relative fat mass (RFM), as a potential marker of body fat distribution, may offer insights beyond traditional metrics like body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference. This study aims to investigate the association between RFM and gallstone prevalence in the U.S. population.

Methods: The study cohort comprised 6,881 participants obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted between 2017 and 2020. Participants were stratified into quartiles (Q1-Q4) based on their RFM. To evaluate the associations, multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to assess odds ratios (OR) for gallstone risk across different quartiles of RFM. Additionally, restricted cubic spline analysis was conducted to ascertain the relationship trend while subgroup analyses examined interactions based on age, sex, race, education level, and lifestyle factors.

Results: The analysis revealed significant associations for participants within the higher RFM quartiles (Q3 and Q4), with ORs of 2.58 (95% CI: 1.65, 4.04) and 6.30 (95% CI: 3.63, 10.93), respectively, compared to Q1. The findings consistently indicated that RFM, particularly in Q4, is a strong predictor of gallstone risk, demonstrating superior predictive performance relative to waist circumference and BMI, as evidenced by an AUC of 0.702.

Conclusion: Elevated RFM is a noteworthy predictor of gallstone risk in the studied population, suggesting its potential utility in clinical risk assessment frameworks. Future research should focus on elucidating the underlying mechanisms driving this association and exploring RFM's applicability as a pragmatic tool in clinical practice for gallstone risk stratification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Nutrition
Frontiers in Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
2891
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: No subject pertains more to human life than nutrition. The aim of Frontiers in Nutrition is to integrate major scientific disciplines in this vast field in order to address the most relevant and pertinent questions and developments. Our ambition is to create an integrated podium based on original research, clinical trials, and contemporary reviews to build a reputable knowledge forum in the domains of human health, dietary behaviors, agronomy & 21st century food science. Through the recognized open-access Frontiers platform we welcome manuscripts to our dedicated sections relating to different areas in the field of nutrition with a focus on human health. Specialty sections in Frontiers in Nutrition include, for example, Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition & Sustainable Diets, Nutrition and Food Science Technology, Nutrition Methodology, Sport & Exercise Nutrition, Food Chemistry, and Nutritional Immunology. Based on the publication of rigorous scientific research, we thrive to achieve a visible impact on the global nutrition agenda addressing the grand challenges of our time, including obesity, malnutrition, hunger, food waste, sustainability and consumer health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信