人造肉:是不是素食主义者?探索年轻素食者和杂食者对这项新技术的看法。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Madeleine Lanz, Bianca Wassmann, Michael Siegrist
{"title":"人造肉:是不是素食主义者?探索年轻素食者和杂食者对这项新技术的看法。","authors":"Madeleine Lanz,&nbsp;Bianca Wassmann,&nbsp;Michael Siegrist","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since cultured meat is often framed as a more ethical alternative to conventional livestock farming, the question arises of whether it also appeals to vegetarians. To explore this, our study is among the first to examine cultured meat acceptance in a large vegetarian sample (<em>n</em> = 282) while using an equally sized omnivore group (<em>n</em> = 284) as a reference. This online study's participants were Germans aged 18 to 35. We compared both groups in terms of their associations with cultured meat, their perception of its benefits, and whether they classified it as \"vegetarian.\" Additionally, participants rated how disgusting, tasty, healthy, eco-friendly, and natural they perceive a cultured meat burger compared to conventional and plant-based burgers. The results indicated that cultured meat presents a conflict for vegetarians: While they recognized the environmental and animal welfare benefits of cultured meat more than omnivores, they were less willing to consume it. A key barrier was uncertainty over whether cultured meat aligns with vegetarianism. Instead, vegetarians showed a clear preference for the plant-based burger over the cultured option, suggesting that many prefer familiar, plant-based foods and see little incentive to adopt this novel alternative. Across both dietary groups, gender and food neophobia emerged as key predictors of cultured meat perceptions. Overall, our study challenges the assumption that vegetarians could widely accept cultured meat as a suitable meat alternative. However, cultured meat has the potential to offer a solution for consumers who want to reduce their meat consumption but who are dissatisfied with current alternatives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 108059"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultured meat: Vegetarian or not? Exploring young vegetarians' and omnivores’ perceptions of this new technology\",\"authors\":\"Madeleine Lanz,&nbsp;Bianca Wassmann,&nbsp;Michael Siegrist\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Since cultured meat is often framed as a more ethical alternative to conventional livestock farming, the question arises of whether it also appeals to vegetarians. To explore this, our study is among the first to examine cultured meat acceptance in a large vegetarian sample (<em>n</em> = 282) while using an equally sized omnivore group (<em>n</em> = 284) as a reference. This online study's participants were Germans aged 18 to 35. We compared both groups in terms of their associations with cultured meat, their perception of its benefits, and whether they classified it as \\\"vegetarian.\\\" Additionally, participants rated how disgusting, tasty, healthy, eco-friendly, and natural they perceive a cultured meat burger compared to conventional and plant-based burgers. The results indicated that cultured meat presents a conflict for vegetarians: While they recognized the environmental and animal welfare benefits of cultured meat more than omnivores, they were less willing to consume it. A key barrier was uncertainty over whether cultured meat aligns with vegetarianism. Instead, vegetarians showed a clear preference for the plant-based burger over the cultured option, suggesting that many prefer familiar, plant-based foods and see little incentive to adopt this novel alternative. Across both dietary groups, gender and food neophobia emerged as key predictors of cultured meat perceptions. Overall, our study challenges the assumption that vegetarians could widely accept cultured meat as a suitable meat alternative. However, cultured meat has the potential to offer a solution for consumers who want to reduce their meat consumption but who are dissatisfied with current alternatives.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":\"213 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108059\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325002120\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325002120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于人造肉通常被认为是传统畜牧业的一种更合乎道德的选择,问题就出现了,它是否也吸引素食者。为了探索这一点,我们的研究是第一个在大量素食样本(n = 282)中检查培养肉接受度的研究之一,同时使用同等规模的杂食组(n = 284)作为参考。这项在线研究的参与者是年龄在18到35岁之间的德国人。我们比较了两组人与人造肉的联系,他们对人造肉的好处的看法,以及他们是否将其归类为“素食者”。此外,参与者还评估了与传统汉堡和植物汉堡相比,他们对人造肉汉堡的恶心、美味、健康、环保和自然程度。研究结果表明,人造肉对素食者来说是一种矛盾:虽然他们比杂食动物更能意识到人造肉对环境和动物福利的好处,但他们不太愿意食用人造肉。一个关键的障碍是不确定人造肉是否与素食主义一致。相反,素食者对植物性汉堡的偏好明显高于养殖汉堡,这表明许多人更喜欢熟悉的植物性食物,并且没有动力采用这种新颖的替代品。在这两个饮食群体中,性别和对新食物的恐惧成为了对人造肉看法的关键预测因素。总的来说,我们的研究挑战了素食者可以广泛接受培养肉作为合适肉类替代品的假设。然而,对于那些想要减少肉类消费但又对现有替代品不满意的消费者来说,培养肉有可能提供一种解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cultured meat: Vegetarian or not? Exploring young vegetarians' and omnivores’ perceptions of this new technology
Since cultured meat is often framed as a more ethical alternative to conventional livestock farming, the question arises of whether it also appeals to vegetarians. To explore this, our study is among the first to examine cultured meat acceptance in a large vegetarian sample (n = 282) while using an equally sized omnivore group (n = 284) as a reference. This online study's participants were Germans aged 18 to 35. We compared both groups in terms of their associations with cultured meat, their perception of its benefits, and whether they classified it as "vegetarian." Additionally, participants rated how disgusting, tasty, healthy, eco-friendly, and natural they perceive a cultured meat burger compared to conventional and plant-based burgers. The results indicated that cultured meat presents a conflict for vegetarians: While they recognized the environmental and animal welfare benefits of cultured meat more than omnivores, they were less willing to consume it. A key barrier was uncertainty over whether cultured meat aligns with vegetarianism. Instead, vegetarians showed a clear preference for the plant-based burger over the cultured option, suggesting that many prefer familiar, plant-based foods and see little incentive to adopt this novel alternative. Across both dietary groups, gender and food neophobia emerged as key predictors of cultured meat perceptions. Overall, our study challenges the assumption that vegetarians could widely accept cultured meat as a suitable meat alternative. However, cultured meat has the potential to offer a solution for consumers who want to reduce their meat consumption but who are dissatisfied with current alternatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信