Camila L.P. Oliveira , Sarah A. Elliott , Arya M. Sharma , Mario Siervo , Aloys Berg , Sunita Ghosh , Vicky Drapeau , Carla M. Prado
{"title":"低饱腹反应的健康、正常体重成人的代谢谱","authors":"Camila L.P. Oliveira , Sarah A. Elliott , Arya M. Sharma , Mario Siervo , Aloys Berg , Sunita Ghosh , Vicky Drapeau , Carla M. Prado","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this study was to characterize the metabolic profile of healthy, normal-weight adults presenting with low satiety responsiveness. Individuals were categorized with low or high satiety responsiveness (LSR and HSR, respectively) based on the satiety quotient (SQ), a marker of satiety responsiveness, which was calculated following two isocaloric breakfast test meals offered while participants were inside the whole-room indirect calorimeter (WRIC): 1) North American: 55 % carbohydrate, 15 % protein, and 30 % fat; 2) High-protein: 31 % carbohydrate, 43 % protein, and 26 % fat. Following the North American breakfast, participants continued receiving a diet resembling the North American dietary pattern while inside the WRIC for 32 consecutive hours where the following outcome measures were assessed: energy metabolism components, metabolic blood markers, and appetite sensations. Forty-three participants were included; 13 were classified as LSR (n = 3 females; n = 10 males), n = 16 as HSR (n = 10 females; n = 6 males), and n = 14 were uncategorized. Compared with HSR, individuals with LSR had higher body weight (5.4 ± 2.5 kg; <em>P</em> = 0.042) and waist circumference (LSR: 77.5 (7.6) cm; HSR: 70.7 (5.2) cm; <em>P</em> = 0.012). Participants with LSR presented with higher total energy expenditure (184 ± 85 kcal/day; <em>P</em> = 0.040) and carbohydrate oxidation rate (34 ± 13 g/day; <em>P</em> = 0.015). Moreover, individuals in the LSR category presented with weakened satiety response to the meals when compared to those with HSR. Our primary findings were that, compared to individuals with HSR, those in the LSR category exhibited differences in their metabolic profile. The long-term impact on body weight and overall health should be assessed in further studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 108031"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metabolic profile of healthy, normal-weight adults with low satiety responsiveness\",\"authors\":\"Camila L.P. Oliveira , Sarah A. Elliott , Arya M. Sharma , Mario Siervo , Aloys Berg , Sunita Ghosh , Vicky Drapeau , Carla M. Prado\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The aim of this study was to characterize the metabolic profile of healthy, normal-weight adults presenting with low satiety responsiveness. Individuals were categorized with low or high satiety responsiveness (LSR and HSR, respectively) based on the satiety quotient (SQ), a marker of satiety responsiveness, which was calculated following two isocaloric breakfast test meals offered while participants were inside the whole-room indirect calorimeter (WRIC): 1) North American: 55 % carbohydrate, 15 % protein, and 30 % fat; 2) High-protein: 31 % carbohydrate, 43 % protein, and 26 % fat. Following the North American breakfast, participants continued receiving a diet resembling the North American dietary pattern while inside the WRIC for 32 consecutive hours where the following outcome measures were assessed: energy metabolism components, metabolic blood markers, and appetite sensations. Forty-three participants were included; 13 were classified as LSR (n = 3 females; n = 10 males), n = 16 as HSR (n = 10 females; n = 6 males), and n = 14 were uncategorized. Compared with HSR, individuals with LSR had higher body weight (5.4 ± 2.5 kg; <em>P</em> = 0.042) and waist circumference (LSR: 77.5 (7.6) cm; HSR: 70.7 (5.2) cm; <em>P</em> = 0.012). Participants with LSR presented with higher total energy expenditure (184 ± 85 kcal/day; <em>P</em> = 0.040) and carbohydrate oxidation rate (34 ± 13 g/day; <em>P</em> = 0.015). Moreover, individuals in the LSR category presented with weakened satiety response to the meals when compared to those with HSR. Our primary findings were that, compared to individuals with HSR, those in the LSR category exhibited differences in their metabolic profile. The long-term impact on body weight and overall health should be assessed in further studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":\"214 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325001849\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325001849","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Metabolic profile of healthy, normal-weight adults with low satiety responsiveness
The aim of this study was to characterize the metabolic profile of healthy, normal-weight adults presenting with low satiety responsiveness. Individuals were categorized with low or high satiety responsiveness (LSR and HSR, respectively) based on the satiety quotient (SQ), a marker of satiety responsiveness, which was calculated following two isocaloric breakfast test meals offered while participants were inside the whole-room indirect calorimeter (WRIC): 1) North American: 55 % carbohydrate, 15 % protein, and 30 % fat; 2) High-protein: 31 % carbohydrate, 43 % protein, and 26 % fat. Following the North American breakfast, participants continued receiving a diet resembling the North American dietary pattern while inside the WRIC for 32 consecutive hours where the following outcome measures were assessed: energy metabolism components, metabolic blood markers, and appetite sensations. Forty-three participants were included; 13 were classified as LSR (n = 3 females; n = 10 males), n = 16 as HSR (n = 10 females; n = 6 males), and n = 14 were uncategorized. Compared with HSR, individuals with LSR had higher body weight (5.4 ± 2.5 kg; P = 0.042) and waist circumference (LSR: 77.5 (7.6) cm; HSR: 70.7 (5.2) cm; P = 0.012). Participants with LSR presented with higher total energy expenditure (184 ± 85 kcal/day; P = 0.040) and carbohydrate oxidation rate (34 ± 13 g/day; P = 0.015). Moreover, individuals in the LSR category presented with weakened satiety response to the meals when compared to those with HSR. Our primary findings were that, compared to individuals with HSR, those in the LSR category exhibited differences in their metabolic profile. The long-term impact on body weight and overall health should be assessed in further studies.
期刊介绍:
Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.