小农农业、化肥使用和多重危机时期:撒哈拉以南非洲纵向调查的跨国证据

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Akuffo Amankwah , Alemayehu Ambel , Sydney Gourlay , Talip Kilic , Yannick Markhof , Philip Wollburg
{"title":"小农农业、化肥使用和多重危机时期:撒哈拉以南非洲纵向调查的跨国证据","authors":"Akuffo Amankwah ,&nbsp;Alemayehu Ambel ,&nbsp;Sydney Gourlay ,&nbsp;Talip Kilic ,&nbsp;Yannick Markhof ,&nbsp;Philip Wollburg","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Smallholder agriculture continues to be the main source of livelihood for a large portion of Sub-Saharan Africa’s population. In recent years, compounding crises and shocks have threatened this livelihood basis. How did smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa fare throughout this period? What measures did they take to cope with the repeated disruption to their farming activities? We address this knowledge gap using nationally representative, cross-country comparable longitudinal microdata collected from over 16,000 agricultural households in six Sub-Saharan African countries between 2018 and 2024. While overall fertilizer adoption remained relatively stable, we find considerable cross-country heterogeneity and poorer households to be more likely to have discontinued fertilizer use. At the intensive margin, 47% of farmers could not access their desired quantity of fertilizer. On average, these farmers used less than half as much inorganic fertilizer as they desired with affordability being the main constraint. Households adopted a range of coping strategies, some of which may compromise productivity and heighten future vulnerability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 102885"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smallholder farming, fertilizer use, and the polycrisis period: Cross-country evidence from longitudinal surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa\",\"authors\":\"Akuffo Amankwah ,&nbsp;Alemayehu Ambel ,&nbsp;Sydney Gourlay ,&nbsp;Talip Kilic ,&nbsp;Yannick Markhof ,&nbsp;Philip Wollburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Smallholder agriculture continues to be the main source of livelihood for a large portion of Sub-Saharan Africa’s population. In recent years, compounding crises and shocks have threatened this livelihood basis. How did smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa fare throughout this period? What measures did they take to cope with the repeated disruption to their farming activities? We address this knowledge gap using nationally representative, cross-country comparable longitudinal microdata collected from over 16,000 agricultural households in six Sub-Saharan African countries between 2018 and 2024. While overall fertilizer adoption remained relatively stable, we find considerable cross-country heterogeneity and poorer households to be more likely to have discontinued fertilizer use. At the intensive margin, 47% of farmers could not access their desired quantity of fertilizer. On average, these farmers used less than half as much inorganic fertilizer as they desired with affordability being the main constraint. Households adopted a range of coping strategies, some of which may compromise productivity and heighten future vulnerability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Policy\",\"volume\":\"133 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102885\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225000892\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225000892","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小农农业仍然是撒哈拉以南非洲大部分人口的主要生计来源。近年来,不断加剧的危机和冲击威胁着这一生计基础。撒哈拉以南非洲地区的小农在这段时间里过得怎么样?他们采取了什么措施来应对农业活动的反复中断?我们利用2018年至2024年间从六个撒哈拉以南非洲国家的16,000多个农户收集的具有全国代表性的跨国可比纵向微观数据来解决这一知识差距。虽然肥料的总体采用率保持相对稳定,但我们发现相当大的跨国异质性,较贫穷的家庭更有可能停止使用肥料。在集约化边际,47%的农民无法获得所需数量的肥料。平均而言,这些农民使用的无机肥料不到他们所需量的一半,主要制约因素是负担能力。家庭采取了一系列应对策略,其中一些策略可能会损害生产力并增加未来的脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Smallholder farming, fertilizer use, and the polycrisis period: Cross-country evidence from longitudinal surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa
Smallholder agriculture continues to be the main source of livelihood for a large portion of Sub-Saharan Africa’s population. In recent years, compounding crises and shocks have threatened this livelihood basis. How did smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa fare throughout this period? What measures did they take to cope with the repeated disruption to their farming activities? We address this knowledge gap using nationally representative, cross-country comparable longitudinal microdata collected from over 16,000 agricultural households in six Sub-Saharan African countries between 2018 and 2024. While overall fertilizer adoption remained relatively stable, we find considerable cross-country heterogeneity and poorer households to be more likely to have discontinued fertilizer use. At the intensive margin, 47% of farmers could not access their desired quantity of fertilizer. On average, these farmers used less than half as much inorganic fertilizer as they desired with affordability being the main constraint. Households adopted a range of coping strategies, some of which may compromise productivity and heighten future vulnerability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信