{"title":"前下颌牵张成骨:治疗特发性髁突吸收所致下颌后颌畸形时髁突稳定性的回顾性研究。","authors":"Mengdie Chen, Yangyang Lin, Jiangfei Chen, Qi Xu, Yuanfu Hou, Zhiling Zhang, Bailing Yuan, Min Hou","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The etiology of idiopathic condylar resorption (ICR) is not conclusively established, and its treatment is primarily focused on correcting secondary maxillofacial deformities. Condylar resorption is a common complication of the treatment of ICR. As one treatment for mandibular retrognathia secondary to idiopathic condylar resorption (MRSICR), distraction osteogenesis (DO) can improve the facial profile and the occlusion. However, it has not been accurately determined whether DO could cause damage to the condyle. In this experiment, one innovative therapeutic modality was used to treat MRSICR by changing the traction device from the traditional posterior position of the mandibular body to the premolar region to explore a treatment method with less impact on the temporomandibular joint area (TMJ).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 11 patients (22 condyles) were included. To simulate the direction of traction, preoperative digital design was performed. Patients' radiological data were collected preoperatively (T0), six months following surgery (T1), a year following surgery (T2), and three years following surgery (T3). The changes in the distance of the TMJ space and in the surface area, volume, condylar plane angle, and condylar height at different intervals were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surface area, volume, height and the distances of anterior and posterior joint spaces of the condyle did not alter significantly after surgery (P > 0.05). Significant differences were found in the postoperative changes in supra-joint space and the condylar displacement in cross-section (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study suggests that as a treatment for MRSICR, the DO of the anterior mandible has shown some advantages in avoiding postoperative complications as condylar resorption. Larger sample sizes are required for future research to validate the viability of this technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anterior mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a retrospective study of condylar stability in the treatment of mandibular retrognathia secondary to idiopathic condylar resorption.\",\"authors\":\"Mengdie Chen, Yangyang Lin, Jiangfei Chen, Qi Xu, Yuanfu Hou, Zhiling Zhang, Bailing Yuan, Min Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The etiology of idiopathic condylar resorption (ICR) is not conclusively established, and its treatment is primarily focused on correcting secondary maxillofacial deformities. Condylar resorption is a common complication of the treatment of ICR. As one treatment for mandibular retrognathia secondary to idiopathic condylar resorption (MRSICR), distraction osteogenesis (DO) can improve the facial profile and the occlusion. However, it has not been accurately determined whether DO could cause damage to the condyle. In this experiment, one innovative therapeutic modality was used to treat MRSICR by changing the traction device from the traditional posterior position of the mandibular body to the premolar region to explore a treatment method with less impact on the temporomandibular joint area (TMJ).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 11 patients (22 condyles) were included. To simulate the direction of traction, preoperative digital design was performed. Patients' radiological data were collected preoperatively (T0), six months following surgery (T1), a year following surgery (T2), and three years following surgery (T3). The changes in the distance of the TMJ space and in the surface area, volume, condylar plane angle, and condylar height at different intervals were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surface area, volume, height and the distances of anterior and posterior joint spaces of the condyle did not alter significantly after surgery (P > 0.05). Significant differences were found in the postoperative changes in supra-joint space and the condylar displacement in cross-section (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study suggests that as a treatment for MRSICR, the DO of the anterior mandible has shown some advantages in avoiding postoperative complications as condylar resorption. Larger sample sizes are required for future research to validate the viability of this technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102391\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anterior mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a retrospective study of condylar stability in the treatment of mandibular retrognathia secondary to idiopathic condylar resorption.
Introduction: The etiology of idiopathic condylar resorption (ICR) is not conclusively established, and its treatment is primarily focused on correcting secondary maxillofacial deformities. Condylar resorption is a common complication of the treatment of ICR. As one treatment for mandibular retrognathia secondary to idiopathic condylar resorption (MRSICR), distraction osteogenesis (DO) can improve the facial profile and the occlusion. However, it has not been accurately determined whether DO could cause damage to the condyle. In this experiment, one innovative therapeutic modality was used to treat MRSICR by changing the traction device from the traditional posterior position of the mandibular body to the premolar region to explore a treatment method with less impact on the temporomandibular joint area (TMJ).
Materials and methods: A total of 11 patients (22 condyles) were included. To simulate the direction of traction, preoperative digital design was performed. Patients' radiological data were collected preoperatively (T0), six months following surgery (T1), a year following surgery (T2), and three years following surgery (T3). The changes in the distance of the TMJ space and in the surface area, volume, condylar plane angle, and condylar height at different intervals were assessed.
Results: Surface area, volume, height and the distances of anterior and posterior joint spaces of the condyle did not alter significantly after surgery (P > 0.05). Significant differences were found in the postoperative changes in supra-joint space and the condylar displacement in cross-section (P < 0.05).
Discussion: Our study suggests that as a treatment for MRSICR, the DO of the anterior mandible has shown some advantages in avoiding postoperative complications as condylar resorption. Larger sample sizes are required for future research to validate the viability of this technique.
期刊介绍:
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics.
Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must:
Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise;
Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research;
Be solely the work of the author(s) stated;
Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal;
Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.