{"title":"脱细胞真皮基质同时植入的疗效:临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Malik Alkabazi, Nawel Ouakouak, Ebtesam Aldieb","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The vertical soft tissue thickness over the implant is essential for long-term procedure success and for biological integration of the suprabony soft tissue component, consequently, development of alternatives to autogenous soft tissue grafts such as allogeneic and xenogeneic grafts were needed. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is utilized to provide structural support for angiogenesis, revascularization and tissue remodeling in soft tissue augmentation, recession, and increasing the keratinized tissue width. At this point, the aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the amount of soft tissue height (STH) gained after augmenting the ADM in combination with the dental implants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed in five databases. The primary outcome measure was STH change. Secondary outcomes included marginal bone loss (MBL) and pocket probing depth (PPD) at implant sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies, with 200 participants, and reported pre- and post-operative mean of vertical tissue thickness, MBL, and PPD around implants were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled mean difference (MD) of STH was 0.84 (95 % CI:0.28 to 1.39) with a p-value < 0.0001. A total of three studies, reported MBL. The pooled MD of MBL around implants, comparing the mean change from baseline to 12 months. The random effect model revealed a MD of 0.07mm (95 % CI: -0.21 to 0.35 mm, p= 0.6325). Calculation of pooled MD of PPD at implant sites, comparing ADM groups to the control groups in three studies; the random effect model revealed a MD of -0.13mm (95 % CI: -0.47 to 0.22 mm, p= 0.4742).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While Acellular dermal matrix significantly improves vertical soft tissue thickness, it does not significantly impact marginal bone loss or pocket probing depth.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Acellular dermal matrix simultaneous with implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Malik Alkabazi, Nawel Ouakouak, Ebtesam Aldieb\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The vertical soft tissue thickness over the implant is essential for long-term procedure success and for biological integration of the suprabony soft tissue component, consequently, development of alternatives to autogenous soft tissue grafts such as allogeneic and xenogeneic grafts were needed. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is utilized to provide structural support for angiogenesis, revascularization and tissue remodeling in soft tissue augmentation, recession, and increasing the keratinized tissue width. At this point, the aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the amount of soft tissue height (STH) gained after augmenting the ADM in combination with the dental implants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed in five databases. The primary outcome measure was STH change. Secondary outcomes included marginal bone loss (MBL) and pocket probing depth (PPD) at implant sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies, with 200 participants, and reported pre- and post-operative mean of vertical tissue thickness, MBL, and PPD around implants were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled mean difference (MD) of STH was 0.84 (95 % CI:0.28 to 1.39) with a p-value < 0.0001. A total of three studies, reported MBL. The pooled MD of MBL around implants, comparing the mean change from baseline to 12 months. The random effect model revealed a MD of 0.07mm (95 % CI: -0.21 to 0.35 mm, p= 0.6325). Calculation of pooled MD of PPD at implant sites, comparing ADM groups to the control groups in three studies; the random effect model revealed a MD of -0.13mm (95 % CI: -0.47 to 0.22 mm, p= 0.4742).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While Acellular dermal matrix significantly improves vertical soft tissue thickness, it does not significantly impact marginal bone loss or pocket probing depth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102371\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102371","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of Acellular dermal matrix simultaneous with implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.
Purpose: The vertical soft tissue thickness over the implant is essential for long-term procedure success and for biological integration of the suprabony soft tissue component, consequently, development of alternatives to autogenous soft tissue grafts such as allogeneic and xenogeneic grafts were needed. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is utilized to provide structural support for angiogenesis, revascularization and tissue remodeling in soft tissue augmentation, recession, and increasing the keratinized tissue width. At this point, the aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the amount of soft tissue height (STH) gained after augmenting the ADM in combination with the dental implants.
Methods: A systematic search was performed in five databases. The primary outcome measure was STH change. Secondary outcomes included marginal bone loss (MBL) and pocket probing depth (PPD) at implant sites.
Results: Six studies, with 200 participants, and reported pre- and post-operative mean of vertical tissue thickness, MBL, and PPD around implants were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled mean difference (MD) of STH was 0.84 (95 % CI:0.28 to 1.39) with a p-value < 0.0001. A total of three studies, reported MBL. The pooled MD of MBL around implants, comparing the mean change from baseline to 12 months. The random effect model revealed a MD of 0.07mm (95 % CI: -0.21 to 0.35 mm, p= 0.6325). Calculation of pooled MD of PPD at implant sites, comparing ADM groups to the control groups in three studies; the random effect model revealed a MD of -0.13mm (95 % CI: -0.47 to 0.22 mm, p= 0.4742).
Conclusion: While Acellular dermal matrix significantly improves vertical soft tissue thickness, it does not significantly impact marginal bone loss or pocket probing depth.
期刊介绍:
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics.
Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must:
Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise;
Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research;
Be solely the work of the author(s) stated;
Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal;
Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.