沟通舒适中的情绪反应:过程沟通模型棱镜下的人格效应。

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Sixtine Lefebvre, Virginie Beaucousin
{"title":"沟通舒适中的情绪反应:过程沟通模型棱镜下的人格效应。","authors":"Sixtine Lefebvre, Virginie Beaucousin","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2487521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study investigated the link between personality and emotional response modulation during an interview. Ninety participants were filmed responding to different processes of communication: they were asked to respond to questions that required them to answer with either facts or opinions. Emotionally-tinged and complicit exchanges were proposed and directive ways of communicating were offered so as to get them into action or to appeal to their imagination. Their skin conductance responses were recorded at the same time. Personality traits were assessed through process communication model (PCM) questionnaire. The results suggested that everybody could receive each process<sup>1</sup>, nevertheless, emotional responses varied according to PCM Base Type. Although only Persister Base participants showed significant differences from all other Base Types, we observed that participants' emotional responses were modulated according to the different processes sent: offering a connection through opinions generated a high emotional response, as did create intimacy, while participants had a low emotional response when asked to visualise a situation by projecting themselves. These results reinforce the idea that adapting one's communication to one's interlocutor personality enables easier exchanges in dual communication situations. What's more, respecting inter-individual differences fosters greater tolerance, while increasing everyone's relational agility.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotional responses during communicational comfort: the effect of personality through the prism of process communication model.\",\"authors\":\"Sixtine Lefebvre, Virginie Beaucousin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02699931.2025.2487521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present study investigated the link between personality and emotional response modulation during an interview. Ninety participants were filmed responding to different processes of communication: they were asked to respond to questions that required them to answer with either facts or opinions. Emotionally-tinged and complicit exchanges were proposed and directive ways of communicating were offered so as to get them into action or to appeal to their imagination. Their skin conductance responses were recorded at the same time. Personality traits were assessed through process communication model (PCM) questionnaire. The results suggested that everybody could receive each process<sup>1</sup>, nevertheless, emotional responses varied according to PCM Base Type. Although only Persister Base participants showed significant differences from all other Base Types, we observed that participants' emotional responses were modulated according to the different processes sent: offering a connection through opinions generated a high emotional response, as did create intimacy, while participants had a low emotional response when asked to visualise a situation by projecting themselves. These results reinforce the idea that adapting one's communication to one's interlocutor personality enables easier exchanges in dual communication situations. What's more, respecting inter-individual differences fosters greater tolerance, while increasing everyone's relational agility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition & Emotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition & Emotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2487521\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition & Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2487521","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了访谈中人格与情绪反应调节之间的关系。90名参与者对不同交流过程的反应被拍摄下来:他们被要求回答要求他们用事实或观点回答的问题。他们提出了带有情感色彩和共谋的交流,并提供了指导性的沟通方式,以便让他们采取行动或吸引他们的想象力。同时记录他们的皮肤电导反应。采用过程沟通模型(PCM)问卷进行人格特征评估。结果表明,每个人都能接收到每一个过程,然而,情绪反应因PCM基础类型而异。尽管只有“持久性基础”的参与者表现出与所有其他基础类型的显著差异,但我们观察到,参与者的情绪反应是根据发送的不同过程而调整的:通过意见提供联系会产生高度的情绪反应,从而产生亲密关系,而当被要求通过投射自己来想象一个情境时,参与者的情绪反应则很低。这些结果强化了这样一种观点,即使一个人的沟通适应对话者的个性,可以使双重沟通情况下的交流更容易。更重要的是,尊重个体之间的差异可以培养更大的宽容,同时提高每个人的关系敏捷性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emotional responses during communicational comfort: the effect of personality through the prism of process communication model.

The present study investigated the link between personality and emotional response modulation during an interview. Ninety participants were filmed responding to different processes of communication: they were asked to respond to questions that required them to answer with either facts or opinions. Emotionally-tinged and complicit exchanges were proposed and directive ways of communicating were offered so as to get them into action or to appeal to their imagination. Their skin conductance responses were recorded at the same time. Personality traits were assessed through process communication model (PCM) questionnaire. The results suggested that everybody could receive each process1, nevertheless, emotional responses varied according to PCM Base Type. Although only Persister Base participants showed significant differences from all other Base Types, we observed that participants' emotional responses were modulated according to the different processes sent: offering a connection through opinions generated a high emotional response, as did create intimacy, while participants had a low emotional response when asked to visualise a situation by projecting themselves. These results reinforce the idea that adapting one's communication to one's interlocutor personality enables easier exchanges in dual communication situations. What's more, respecting inter-individual differences fosters greater tolerance, while increasing everyone's relational agility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition & Emotion
Cognition & Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Cognition & Emotion is devoted to the study of emotion, especially to those aspects of emotion related to cognitive processes. The journal aims to bring together work on emotion undertaken by researchers in cognitive, social, clinical, and developmental psychology, neuropsychology, and cognitive science. Examples of topics appropriate for the journal include the role of cognitive processes in emotion elicitation, regulation, and expression; the impact of emotion on attention, memory, learning, motivation, judgements, and decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信