美国印第安人社区的COVID-19疫苗接种,可接受性和大流行恢复。

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES
Anna E Epperson, Nanibaa' A Garrison, Thomas Kim, Mark LeBeau, Luke C Nez, Arleen F Brown, Savanna L Carson
{"title":"美国印第安人社区的COVID-19疫苗接种,可接受性和大流行恢复。","authors":"Anna E Epperson, Nanibaa' A Garrison, Thomas Kim, Mark LeBeau, Luke C Nez, Arleen F Brown, Savanna L Carson","doi":"10.1037/cdp0000749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study explored perspectives on COVID-19 vaccine acceptability, access, and strategies for pandemic recovery among rural and urban/suburban American Indian (AI) community leaders and members in California.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The qualitative study was initiated by a community-academic partnership with a large AI health organization and two universities and included virtual focus groups focused on COVID-19 vaccine acceptability (concerns, risks, benefits), initial vaccine rollout accessibility (vaccination site preferences, accessibility, strategies for improving vaccination), and recommendations for pandemic recovery. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to generate themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Fall 2021, three urban/suburban (<i>n</i> = 9) and three rural (<i>n</i> = 9) AI focus groups in California were held virtually. A majority of participants were Tribal or community leaders (<i>n</i> = 12). Participants in both urban/suburban and rural settings reported preferences for Tribal or Indian Health Service clinics for vaccination and recommended culturally tailored COVID-19 educational materials, health services, and community events to promote pandemic recovery. Participants in rural groups provided examples of tailored community-led pandemic care but illustrated how health care access limited vaccination, how basic needs affected vaccine prioritization, and how gaps in data on AI communities limited local informed decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings demonstrate differences in the COVID-19 experience among AI adults living in urban/suburban and rural regions, including vaccine access and basic needs concerns. Findings also highlight local preferences in the pandemic community response and recommendations for culturally tailored health information, health services, and gatherings. Public health campaigns may require additional resources for AI communities to improve equitable distribution and uptake. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48151,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 vaccination access, acceptability, and pandemic recovery in American Indian communities.\",\"authors\":\"Anna E Epperson, Nanibaa' A Garrison, Thomas Kim, Mark LeBeau, Luke C Nez, Arleen F Brown, Savanna L Carson\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/cdp0000749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study explored perspectives on COVID-19 vaccine acceptability, access, and strategies for pandemic recovery among rural and urban/suburban American Indian (AI) community leaders and members in California.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The qualitative study was initiated by a community-academic partnership with a large AI health organization and two universities and included virtual focus groups focused on COVID-19 vaccine acceptability (concerns, risks, benefits), initial vaccine rollout accessibility (vaccination site preferences, accessibility, strategies for improving vaccination), and recommendations for pandemic recovery. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to generate themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Fall 2021, three urban/suburban (<i>n</i> = 9) and three rural (<i>n</i> = 9) AI focus groups in California were held virtually. A majority of participants were Tribal or community leaders (<i>n</i> = 12). Participants in both urban/suburban and rural settings reported preferences for Tribal or Indian Health Service clinics for vaccination and recommended culturally tailored COVID-19 educational materials, health services, and community events to promote pandemic recovery. Participants in rural groups provided examples of tailored community-led pandemic care but illustrated how health care access limited vaccination, how basic needs affected vaccine prioritization, and how gaps in data on AI communities limited local informed decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings demonstrate differences in the COVID-19 experience among AI adults living in urban/suburban and rural regions, including vaccine access and basic needs concerns. Findings also highlight local preferences in the pandemic community response and recommendations for culturally tailored health information, health services, and gatherings. Public health campaigns may require additional resources for AI communities to improve equitable distribution and uptake. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000749\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000749","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨了加利福尼亚州农村和城市/郊区美国印第安人(AI)社区领导人和成员对COVID-19疫苗的可接受性、可获得性和大流行恢复策略的看法。方法:定性研究由一家大型人工智能卫生组织和两所大学的社区学术伙伴关系发起,包括虚拟焦点小组,重点关注COVID-19疫苗的可接受性(关注、风险、益处)、最初疫苗推广的可及性(疫苗接种地点偏好、可及性、改进疫苗接种的策略)以及大流行恢复的建议。反身性主位分析用于生成主位。结果:在2021年秋季,加利福尼亚州的三个城市/郊区(n = 9)和三个农村(n = 9)人工智能焦点小组进行了虚拟会议。大多数参与者是部落或社区领袖(n = 12)。城市/郊区和农村地区的参与者都报告了对部落或印第安人卫生服务诊所接种疫苗的偏好,并推荐了根据文化量身定制的COVID-19教育材料、卫生服务和社区活动,以促进大流行的恢复。农村小组的与会者提供了社区主导的量身定制大流行病护理的例子,但说明了卫生保健服务如何限制疫苗接种,基本需求如何影响疫苗的优先次序,以及人工智能社区数据的差距如何限制了当地的知情决策。结论:研究结果表明,生活在城市/郊区和农村地区的AI成年人在COVID-19经历方面存在差异,包括疫苗获取和基本需求问题。调查结果还强调了大流行社区应对中的当地偏好,以及针对不同文化定制的卫生信息、卫生服务和聚会的建议。公共卫生运动可能需要为人工智能社区提供额外资源,以改善公平分配和吸收。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 vaccination access, acceptability, and pandemic recovery in American Indian communities.

Objective: The present study explored perspectives on COVID-19 vaccine acceptability, access, and strategies for pandemic recovery among rural and urban/suburban American Indian (AI) community leaders and members in California.

Method: The qualitative study was initiated by a community-academic partnership with a large AI health organization and two universities and included virtual focus groups focused on COVID-19 vaccine acceptability (concerns, risks, benefits), initial vaccine rollout accessibility (vaccination site preferences, accessibility, strategies for improving vaccination), and recommendations for pandemic recovery. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to generate themes.

Results: In Fall 2021, three urban/suburban (n = 9) and three rural (n = 9) AI focus groups in California were held virtually. A majority of participants were Tribal or community leaders (n = 12). Participants in both urban/suburban and rural settings reported preferences for Tribal or Indian Health Service clinics for vaccination and recommended culturally tailored COVID-19 educational materials, health services, and community events to promote pandemic recovery. Participants in rural groups provided examples of tailored community-led pandemic care but illustrated how health care access limited vaccination, how basic needs affected vaccine prioritization, and how gaps in data on AI communities limited local informed decision-making.

Conclusion: Findings demonstrate differences in the COVID-19 experience among AI adults living in urban/suburban and rural regions, including vaccine access and basic needs concerns. Findings also highlight local preferences in the pandemic community response and recommendations for culturally tailored health information, health services, and gatherings. Public health campaigns may require additional resources for AI communities to improve equitable distribution and uptake. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology seeks to publish theoretical, conceptual, research, and case study articles that promote the development of knowledge and understanding, application of psychological principles, and scholarly analysis of social–political forces affecting racial and ethnic minorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信