一线治疗晚期间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性非小细胞肺癌的阿勒替尼、布加替尼和罗瑞替尼:成本-效果分析

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Rahul Mudumba, Jorge J Nieva, William V Padula
{"title":"一线治疗晚期间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性非小细胞肺癌的阿勒替尼、布加替尼和罗瑞替尼:成本-效果分析","authors":"Rahul Mudumba, Jorge J Nieva, William V Padula","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.03.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib as first-line therapies for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer from a US healthcare sector perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a 4-state partitioned survival model using progression-free survival, intracranial progression-free survival, and overall survival data from the ALEX, ALTA-1L, and CROWN clinical trials and published network meta-analyses. This model simulated patient transitions through progression-free, central-nervous-system-related progressed disease, non- central nervous system progressed disease, and death states over a 5-year horizon. Costs (2024 USD) included drug acquisition based on median of Department of Veteran Affairs and wholesale acquisition cost prices, healthcare utilization, and adverse events, all sourced from published literature. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were derived using health utilities bootstrapped from these trials and adjusted for adverse events. We performed sensitivity and scenario analyses to evaluate uncertainty and explore various pricing and efficacy specifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 5-year horizon, alectinib cost $1 105 814 for 2.85 QALYs gained, brigatinib cost $1 059 283 for 2.66 QALYs gained, and lorlatinib cost $1 163 519 for 2.88 QALYs gained. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for alectinib and lorlatinib versus brigatinib were $245 536/QALY and $481 386/QALY, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000 per QALY, brigatinib had a 54% chance of being the cost-effective option, with alectinib at 36% and lorlatinib at 10%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although our model slightly favors brigatinib at a $150 000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, substantial uncertainty precludes definitive cost-effectiveness conclusions among the 3 first-line therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First-Line Alectinib, Brigatinib, and Lorlatinib for Advanced Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Mudumba, Jorge J Nieva, William V Padula\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jval.2025.03.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib as first-line therapies for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer from a US healthcare sector perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a 4-state partitioned survival model using progression-free survival, intracranial progression-free survival, and overall survival data from the ALEX, ALTA-1L, and CROWN clinical trials and published network meta-analyses. This model simulated patient transitions through progression-free, central-nervous-system-related progressed disease, non- central nervous system progressed disease, and death states over a 5-year horizon. Costs (2024 USD) included drug acquisition based on median of Department of Veteran Affairs and wholesale acquisition cost prices, healthcare utilization, and adverse events, all sourced from published literature. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were derived using health utilities bootstrapped from these trials and adjusted for adverse events. We performed sensitivity and scenario analyses to evaluate uncertainty and explore various pricing and efficacy specifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 5-year horizon, alectinib cost $1 105 814 for 2.85 QALYs gained, brigatinib cost $1 059 283 for 2.66 QALYs gained, and lorlatinib cost $1 163 519 for 2.88 QALYs gained. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for alectinib and lorlatinib versus brigatinib were $245 536/QALY and $481 386/QALY, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000 per QALY, brigatinib had a 54% chance of being the cost-effective option, with alectinib at 36% and lorlatinib at 10%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although our model slightly favors brigatinib at a $150 000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, substantial uncertainty precludes definitive cost-effectiveness conclusions among the 3 first-line therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.03.014\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.03.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:从美国医疗保健行业的角度评估阿勒替尼、布加替尼和洛拉替尼作为间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性晚期非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本效益。方法:我们利用ALEX、ALTA-1L和CROWN临床试验的无进展生存期、颅内无进展生存期和总生存期数据以及已发表的网络荟萃分析,建立了一个四状态分区生存模型。该模型模拟了患者在5年内无进展、中枢神经系统相关的进展性疾病、非中枢神经系统进展性疾病和死亡状态的转变。成本(2024美元)包括以退伍军人事务部和批发采购成本价格中位数为基础的药品采购、医疗保健利用率和不良事件,均来自已发表的文献。质量调整生命年(QALYs)是使用从这些试验中获得的健康工具得出的,并根据不良事件进行了调整。我们进行了敏感性和情景分析来评估不确定性,并探讨了不同的定价和疗效规范。结果:在5年的时间里,阿勒替尼获得2.85个QALYs的成本为1 105 814美元,布加替尼获得2.66个QALYs的成本为1 059 283美元,洛拉替尼获得2.88个QALYs的成本为1 163 519美元。阿勒替尼和洛拉替尼与布加替尼的增量成本-效果比分别为245 536美元/QALY和481 386美元/QALY。概率敏感性分析表明,在每个QALY的支付意愿阈值为15万美元时,布加替尼有54%的机会成为具有成本效益的选择,阿勒替尼为36%,氯拉替尼为10%。结论:尽管我们的模型略微倾向于布加替尼在150,000美元/QALY的支付意愿阈值,但实质性的不确定性排除了3种一线治疗的明确成本效益结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First-Line Alectinib, Brigatinib, and Lorlatinib for Advanced Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib as first-line therapies for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer from a US healthcare sector perspective.

Methods: We developed a 4-state partitioned survival model using progression-free survival, intracranial progression-free survival, and overall survival data from the ALEX, ALTA-1L, and CROWN clinical trials and published network meta-analyses. This model simulated patient transitions through progression-free, central-nervous-system-related progressed disease, non- central nervous system progressed disease, and death states over a 5-year horizon. Costs (2024 USD) included drug acquisition based on median of Department of Veteran Affairs and wholesale acquisition cost prices, healthcare utilization, and adverse events, all sourced from published literature. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were derived using health utilities bootstrapped from these trials and adjusted for adverse events. We performed sensitivity and scenario analyses to evaluate uncertainty and explore various pricing and efficacy specifications.

Results: Over a 5-year horizon, alectinib cost $1 105 814 for 2.85 QALYs gained, brigatinib cost $1 059 283 for 2.66 QALYs gained, and lorlatinib cost $1 163 519 for 2.88 QALYs gained. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for alectinib and lorlatinib versus brigatinib were $245 536/QALY and $481 386/QALY, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000 per QALY, brigatinib had a 54% chance of being the cost-effective option, with alectinib at 36% and lorlatinib at 10%.

Conclusions: Although our model slightly favors brigatinib at a $150 000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, substantial uncertainty precludes definitive cost-effectiveness conclusions among the 3 first-line therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信