单克隆抗体B72.3在恶性肿瘤浆液积液诊断中的作用——诊断效果的系统评价和荟萃分析

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY
Cytopathology Pub Date : 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1111/cyt.13493
Alex H. Lin, Matthew Hsu, Joanna K. M. Ng, Sahar J. Farahani, Joshua J. X. Li, Jana Nano, Hamidreza Raeisi-Dehkordi, Wilson Tang, Philippe Vielh, Taulant Muka
{"title":"单克隆抗体B72.3在恶性肿瘤浆液积液诊断中的作用——诊断效果的系统评价和荟萃分析","authors":"Alex H. Lin,&nbsp;Matthew Hsu,&nbsp;Joanna K. M. Ng,&nbsp;Sahar J. Farahani,&nbsp;Joshua J. X. Li,&nbsp;Jana Nano,&nbsp;Hamidreza Raeisi-Dehkordi,&nbsp;Wilson Tang,&nbsp;Philippe Vielh,&nbsp;Taulant Muka","doi":"10.1111/cyt.13493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Immunocytochemistry is often required in the cytologic assessment of malignant serous effusion, particularly for differentiating metastatic carcinoma from mesothelioma. To summarise the diagnostic performance of the monoclonal antibody B72.3, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Five databases were searched for relevant studies and reviewed for data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under curve of summary receiver operating characteristics (AUC-SROC) were calculated for the diagnostic performance of B72.3. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed by the <i>I</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> index and Deeks' funnel plot.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 19 studies (1159 cases) were included. Overall pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (0.72–0.79) and 0.90 (0.74–1.00), respectively. The NLR, PLR and DOR were 0.27 (0.21–0.34), 7.66 (&lt; 0.001–20.46) and 28.26 (0–75.96), respectively. The AUC-SROC was 0.98, indicating a good overall diagnostic accuracy for B72.3. Subgroup analysis for adenocarcinoma (0.75, 0.71–0.79), mesothelioma (0.92, 0.85–0.98) and benign/reactive mesothelial cells (0.96, 0.93–1.00) showed similar sensitivity and specificity, while the sensitivity for adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal/hepatobiliary tract (0.56, 0.41–0.71) and breast (0.55, 0.38–0.71) was significantly lower. High heterogeneity was observed in the majority of our analyses, while no evidence of publication bias was identified.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>B72.3 has an acceptable performance with low sensitivity. With a good specificity, B72.3 may find use in an immunocytochemical panel for excluding benign mesothelial processes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55187,"journal":{"name":"Cytopathology","volume":"36 4","pages":"399-407"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cyt.13493","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of the Monoclonal Antibody B72.3 in Diagnosis of Malignant Carcinomatous Serous Effusions—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance\",\"authors\":\"Alex H. Lin,&nbsp;Matthew Hsu,&nbsp;Joanna K. M. Ng,&nbsp;Sahar J. Farahani,&nbsp;Joshua J. X. Li,&nbsp;Jana Nano,&nbsp;Hamidreza Raeisi-Dehkordi,&nbsp;Wilson Tang,&nbsp;Philippe Vielh,&nbsp;Taulant Muka\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cyt.13493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Immunocytochemistry is often required in the cytologic assessment of malignant serous effusion, particularly for differentiating metastatic carcinoma from mesothelioma. To summarise the diagnostic performance of the monoclonal antibody B72.3, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Five databases were searched for relevant studies and reviewed for data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under curve of summary receiver operating characteristics (AUC-SROC) were calculated for the diagnostic performance of B72.3. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed by the <i>I</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> index and Deeks' funnel plot.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 19 studies (1159 cases) were included. Overall pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (0.72–0.79) and 0.90 (0.74–1.00), respectively. The NLR, PLR and DOR were 0.27 (0.21–0.34), 7.66 (&lt; 0.001–20.46) and 28.26 (0–75.96), respectively. The AUC-SROC was 0.98, indicating a good overall diagnostic accuracy for B72.3. Subgroup analysis for adenocarcinoma (0.75, 0.71–0.79), mesothelioma (0.92, 0.85–0.98) and benign/reactive mesothelial cells (0.96, 0.93–1.00) showed similar sensitivity and specificity, while the sensitivity for adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal/hepatobiliary tract (0.56, 0.41–0.71) and breast (0.55, 0.38–0.71) was significantly lower. High heterogeneity was observed in the majority of our analyses, while no evidence of publication bias was identified.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>B72.3 has an acceptable performance with low sensitivity. With a good specificity, B72.3 may find use in an immunocytochemical panel for excluding benign mesothelial processes.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cytopathology\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"399-407\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cyt.13493\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cyt.13493\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cyt.13493","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在恶性浆液积液的细胞学评估中经常需要免疫细胞化学,特别是在鉴别转移癌和间皮瘤时。为了总结单克隆抗体B72.3的诊断性能,我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。方法:检索5个数据库的相关研究,进行资料提取和偏倚风险评估。计算B72.3诊断效能的综合敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)、诊断优势比(DOR)和综合受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC-SROC)。采用I2指数和Deeks漏斗图评估异质性和发表偏倚。结果:共纳入19项研究(1159例)。总体合并敏感性和特异性分别为0.76(0.72-0.79)和0.90(0.74-1.00)。NLR、PLR和DOR分别为0.27(0.21-0.34)、7.66(结论:B72.3在低灵敏度下性能尚可。B72.3具有良好的特异性,可用于免疫细胞化学检查,以排除良性间皮过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Performance of the Monoclonal Antibody B72.3 in Diagnosis of Malignant Carcinomatous Serous Effusions—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance

Performance of the Monoclonal Antibody B72.3 in Diagnosis of Malignant Carcinomatous Serous Effusions—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance

Objectives

Immunocytochemistry is often required in the cytologic assessment of malignant serous effusion, particularly for differentiating metastatic carcinoma from mesothelioma. To summarise the diagnostic performance of the monoclonal antibody B72.3, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted.

Methods

Five databases were searched for relevant studies and reviewed for data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under curve of summary receiver operating characteristics (AUC-SROC) were calculated for the diagnostic performance of B72.3. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed by the I2 index and Deeks' funnel plot.

Results

In total, 19 studies (1159 cases) were included. Overall pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (0.72–0.79) and 0.90 (0.74–1.00), respectively. The NLR, PLR and DOR were 0.27 (0.21–0.34), 7.66 (< 0.001–20.46) and 28.26 (0–75.96), respectively. The AUC-SROC was 0.98, indicating a good overall diagnostic accuracy for B72.3. Subgroup analysis for adenocarcinoma (0.75, 0.71–0.79), mesothelioma (0.92, 0.85–0.98) and benign/reactive mesothelial cells (0.96, 0.93–1.00) showed similar sensitivity and specificity, while the sensitivity for adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal/hepatobiliary tract (0.56, 0.41–0.71) and breast (0.55, 0.38–0.71) was significantly lower. High heterogeneity was observed in the majority of our analyses, while no evidence of publication bias was identified.

Conclusions

B72.3 has an acceptable performance with low sensitivity. With a good specificity, B72.3 may find use in an immunocytochemical panel for excluding benign mesothelial processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cytopathology
Cytopathology 生物-病理学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Cytopathology is to publish articles relating to those aspects of cytology which will increase our knowledge and understanding of the aetiology, diagnosis and management of human disease. It contains original articles and critical reviews on all aspects of clinical cytology in its broadest sense, including: gynaecological and non-gynaecological cytology; fine needle aspiration and screening strategy. Cytopathology welcomes papers and articles on: ultrastructural, histochemical and immunocytochemical studies of the cell; quantitative cytology and DNA hybridization as applied to cytological material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信