基于国际科学与实证教育评估的新教育议程。

IF 3.6 1区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nandini Chatterjee Singh, Tal Gilead, Anya Chakraborty, Jo Van Herwegen, Nienke van Atteveldt, Gregoire Borst, Stephanie Bugden, Kaja Jasinska, Jonathan Kay, Kenneth Pugh, Anantha Duraiappah
{"title":"基于国际科学与实证教育评估的新教育议程。","authors":"Nandini Chatterjee Singh, Tal Gilead, Anya Chakraborty, Jo Van Herwegen, Nienke van Atteveldt, Gregoire Borst, Stephanie Bugden, Kaja Jasinska, Jonathan Kay, Kenneth Pugh, Anantha Duraiappah","doi":"10.1038/s41539-024-00288-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The International Science and Evidence Based Education Assessment examined whether current education systems develop each person's full potential (aligned with the UN Declaration of Human Rights) and contribute to Sustainable Development Goal 4. Embracing a multidisciplinary approach, nearly 300 scientists from 45 countries conducted the assessment, calling for a shift in education's focus from economic growth to fostering human flourishing. Key findings included (a) the need for an integrative approach to learning, (b) moving beyond meritocracy and exploring potentiality as a better measure of student learning potential, and (c) using technology judiciously for scalable, equitable, and personalised learning. This paper seeks to highlight themes that were foundational to the assessment but not fully discussed within it. It advocates a global, transdisciplinary research agenda to close evidence gaps and inform policy to consider the complexity of the educational system and the need to think beyond existing conventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48503,"journal":{"name":"npj Science of Learning","volume":"10 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new education agenda based on The International Science and Evidence Based Education Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Nandini Chatterjee Singh, Tal Gilead, Anya Chakraborty, Jo Van Herwegen, Nienke van Atteveldt, Gregoire Borst, Stephanie Bugden, Kaja Jasinska, Jonathan Kay, Kenneth Pugh, Anantha Duraiappah\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41539-024-00288-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The International Science and Evidence Based Education Assessment examined whether current education systems develop each person's full potential (aligned with the UN Declaration of Human Rights) and contribute to Sustainable Development Goal 4. Embracing a multidisciplinary approach, nearly 300 scientists from 45 countries conducted the assessment, calling for a shift in education's focus from economic growth to fostering human flourishing. Key findings included (a) the need for an integrative approach to learning, (b) moving beyond meritocracy and exploring potentiality as a better measure of student learning potential, and (c) using technology judiciously for scalable, equitable, and personalised learning. This paper seeks to highlight themes that were foundational to the assessment but not fully discussed within it. It advocates a global, transdisciplinary research agenda to close evidence gaps and inform policy to consider the complexity of the educational system and the need to think beyond existing conventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"npj Science of Learning\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065901/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"npj Science of Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00288-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Science of Learning","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00288-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际科学和循证教育评估审查了当前的教育系统是否开发了每个人的全部潜力(符合《联合国人权宣言》)并有助于实现可持续发展目标4。采用多学科方法,来自45个国家的近300名科学家进行了评估,呼吁将教育的重点从经济增长转向促进人类繁荣。主要发现包括:(a)需要一种综合的学习方法,(b)超越精英主义,探索潜力,作为更好地衡量学生学习潜力的方法,以及(c)明智地使用技术进行可扩展、公平和个性化的学习。本文旨在突出评估的基础主题,但在评估中没有充分讨论。它倡导一个全球性的跨学科研究议程,以弥合证据差距,并为政策提供信息,以考虑教育系统的复杂性和超越现有惯例的思考需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A new education agenda based on The International Science and Evidence Based Education Assessment.

The International Science and Evidence Based Education Assessment examined whether current education systems develop each person's full potential (aligned with the UN Declaration of Human Rights) and contribute to Sustainable Development Goal 4. Embracing a multidisciplinary approach, nearly 300 scientists from 45 countries conducted the assessment, calling for a shift in education's focus from economic growth to fostering human flourishing. Key findings included (a) the need for an integrative approach to learning, (b) moving beyond meritocracy and exploring potentiality as a better measure of student learning potential, and (c) using technology judiciously for scalable, equitable, and personalised learning. This paper seeks to highlight themes that were foundational to the assessment but not fully discussed within it. It advocates a global, transdisciplinary research agenda to close evidence gaps and inform policy to consider the complexity of the educational system and the need to think beyond existing conventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信