{"title":"为竞争而注意或为竞争而注意:在视觉工作记忆中,注意在处理竞争刺激中的可能作用。","authors":"Greer Gillies, Jonathan S Cant, Keisuke Fukuda","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some stimuli (e.g., objects, scenes, faces) are consistently remembered better than others across individuals, due to variations in memorability (the stimulus-intrinsic property that determines ease-of-encoding into visual long-term memory). Within visual working memory (VWM), memorable stimuli enjoy a dual benefit: they are stored more efficiently (observers can store more memorable than forgettable stimuli) and are more competitive (when memorable and forgettable stimuli need to \"compete\" for limited VWM resources, the memorable stimuli are more likely to \"win\" access to those resources). Given the link between attention and VWM, we examined attention as a candidate for the source of the competitive benefit. In experiment 1, we investigated if observers selectively attend to memorable stimuli when encoded along with forgettable during a VWM task. Using a letter report probe task that enabled us to index where attention was allocated during encoding, we found that attention was drawn to memorable faces, but not via automatic attentional capture. In experiment 2, we determined the time course of attention allocation in relation to the emergence of the competitive benefit by manipulating the encoding duration of memorable and forgettable stimuli. The competitive benefit did not emerge until <i>after</i> there were differences in attention allocation, ruling out the possibility that the difference in attention allocation was caused by the competitive benefit within VWM. We speculate that the competitive benefit is a result of attentional differences between memorable and forgettable stimuli. Importantly, we find that attention can interact with stimulus memorability. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attend to compete or compete to attend: The possible role of attention in processing competing stimuli within visual working memory.\",\"authors\":\"Greer Gillies, Jonathan S Cant, Keisuke Fukuda\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xlm0001490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Some stimuli (e.g., objects, scenes, faces) are consistently remembered better than others across individuals, due to variations in memorability (the stimulus-intrinsic property that determines ease-of-encoding into visual long-term memory). Within visual working memory (VWM), memorable stimuli enjoy a dual benefit: they are stored more efficiently (observers can store more memorable than forgettable stimuli) and are more competitive (when memorable and forgettable stimuli need to \\\"compete\\\" for limited VWM resources, the memorable stimuli are more likely to \\\"win\\\" access to those resources). Given the link between attention and VWM, we examined attention as a candidate for the source of the competitive benefit. In experiment 1, we investigated if observers selectively attend to memorable stimuli when encoded along with forgettable during a VWM task. Using a letter report probe task that enabled us to index where attention was allocated during encoding, we found that attention was drawn to memorable faces, but not via automatic attentional capture. In experiment 2, we determined the time course of attention allocation in relation to the emergence of the competitive benefit by manipulating the encoding duration of memorable and forgettable stimuli. The competitive benefit did not emerge until <i>after</i> there were differences in attention allocation, ruling out the possibility that the difference in attention allocation was caused by the competitive benefit within VWM. We speculate that the competitive benefit is a result of attentional differences between memorable and forgettable stimuli. Importantly, we find that attention can interact with stimulus memorability. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001490\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001490","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
某些刺激物(如物体、场景、面孔)在个体中总是比其他刺激物记忆得更好,这是由于可记忆性的差异(刺激物的内在属性决定了编码成视觉长期记忆的难易程度)。在视觉工作记忆(VWM)中,可记忆的刺激具有双重好处:它们的存储效率更高(观察者可以存储比可遗忘刺激更多的可记忆刺激),并且更具竞争性(当可记忆刺激和可遗忘刺激需要“竞争”有限的VWM资源时,可记忆刺激更有可能“赢得”对这些资源的访问)。考虑到注意力和VWM之间的联系,我们将注意力作为竞争利益来源的候选对象进行了研究。在实验1中,我们研究了在VWM任务中,观察者是否选择性地注意到可记忆的刺激和可遗忘的刺激。使用字母报告探测任务,使我们能够在编码过程中索引注意力分配的位置,我们发现注意力被吸引到令人难忘的面孔上,但不是通过自动注意力捕获。在实验2中,我们通过操纵可记忆刺激和可遗忘刺激的编码持续时间来确定与竞争利益出现相关的注意分配的时间过程。竞争利益是在注意分配存在差异之后才出现的,排除了注意分配差异是由VWM内部竞争利益引起的可能性。我们推测,竞争利益是由可记忆刺激和可遗忘刺激之间的注意差异造成的。重要的是,我们发现注意力可以与刺激记忆相互作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Attend to compete or compete to attend: The possible role of attention in processing competing stimuli within visual working memory.
Some stimuli (e.g., objects, scenes, faces) are consistently remembered better than others across individuals, due to variations in memorability (the stimulus-intrinsic property that determines ease-of-encoding into visual long-term memory). Within visual working memory (VWM), memorable stimuli enjoy a dual benefit: they are stored more efficiently (observers can store more memorable than forgettable stimuli) and are more competitive (when memorable and forgettable stimuli need to "compete" for limited VWM resources, the memorable stimuli are more likely to "win" access to those resources). Given the link between attention and VWM, we examined attention as a candidate for the source of the competitive benefit. In experiment 1, we investigated if observers selectively attend to memorable stimuli when encoded along with forgettable during a VWM task. Using a letter report probe task that enabled us to index where attention was allocated during encoding, we found that attention was drawn to memorable faces, but not via automatic attentional capture. In experiment 2, we determined the time course of attention allocation in relation to the emergence of the competitive benefit by manipulating the encoding duration of memorable and forgettable stimuli. The competitive benefit did not emerge until after there were differences in attention allocation, ruling out the possibility that the difference in attention allocation was caused by the competitive benefit within VWM. We speculate that the competitive benefit is a result of attentional differences between memorable and forgettable stimuli. Importantly, we find that attention can interact with stimulus memorability. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.