加拿大职业治疗师对人工智能的看法与展望。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Parmeet Matharu, Elizabeth Pertsev, Patricia Chai, Denise Cheung, Miini Teng, Julia Schmidt, Tal Jarus
{"title":"加拿大职业治疗师对人工智能的看法与展望。","authors":"Parmeet Matharu, Elizabeth Pertsev, Patricia Chai, Denise Cheung, Miini Teng, Julia Schmidt, Tal Jarus","doi":"10.1177/00084174251327301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Technology is rapidly being developed to improve healthcare outcomes. However, the attitudes and perceptions of occupational therapists (OTs) on artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare are not yet known. <b>Purpose:</b> This study aims to: explore Canadian OTs' (a) understanding and knowledge on AI, (b) opinions and perspectives on AI, and (c) perceptions of potential benefits and risks AI might bring to occupational therapy practice in Canada. <b>Method:</b> A sequential explanatory mixed method approach was used to gather perspectives of Canadian registered OTs. Two hundred and eighty-two survey respondents and 15 focus group participants took part in the study. <b>Findings:</b> Three main themes emerged: \"AI Knowledge and Implementation,\" \"Use of AI in Occupational Therapy,\" and \"Human vs. Machine.\" OTs have various levels of understanding of AI, and its capabilities within practice and are open to AI use in practice. Although ethical concerns must be addressed, OTs do not perceive AI to pose a threat to employment. <b>Conclusion:</b> OTs have the ability to implement and guide policy changes for technology adoption, and understanding their current perspectives creates opportunities to advocate for change in the field. Further education is needed to better prepare professionals for clinical usage of AI.</p>","PeriodicalId":49097,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie","volume":" ","pages":"84174251327301"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opinions and Perspectives of Canadian Occupational Therapists on Artificial Intelligence.\",\"authors\":\"Parmeet Matharu, Elizabeth Pertsev, Patricia Chai, Denise Cheung, Miini Teng, Julia Schmidt, Tal Jarus\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00084174251327301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Technology is rapidly being developed to improve healthcare outcomes. However, the attitudes and perceptions of occupational therapists (OTs) on artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare are not yet known. <b>Purpose:</b> This study aims to: explore Canadian OTs' (a) understanding and knowledge on AI, (b) opinions and perspectives on AI, and (c) perceptions of potential benefits and risks AI might bring to occupational therapy practice in Canada. <b>Method:</b> A sequential explanatory mixed method approach was used to gather perspectives of Canadian registered OTs. Two hundred and eighty-two survey respondents and 15 focus group participants took part in the study. <b>Findings:</b> Three main themes emerged: \\\"AI Knowledge and Implementation,\\\" \\\"Use of AI in Occupational Therapy,\\\" and \\\"Human vs. Machine.\\\" OTs have various levels of understanding of AI, and its capabilities within practice and are open to AI use in practice. Although ethical concerns must be addressed, OTs do not perceive AI to pose a threat to employment. <b>Conclusion:</b> OTs have the ability to implement and guide policy changes for technology adoption, and understanding their current perspectives creates opportunities to advocate for change in the field. Further education is needed to better prepare professionals for clinical usage of AI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"84174251327301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174251327301\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174251327301","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:改善医疗保健结果的技术正在迅速发展。然而,职业治疗师(OTs)对医疗保健中人工智能(AI)的态度和看法尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在:探讨加拿大职业医生(a)对人工智能的理解和认识,(b)对人工智能的看法和观点,以及(c)对人工智能可能给加拿大职业治疗实践带来的潜在利益和风险的看法。方法:采用序贯解释混合方法收集加拿大注册境外组织的观点。282名调查对象和15名焦点小组参与者参与了这项研究。研究结果:出现了三个主要主题:“人工智能知识和实施”、“人工智能在职业治疗中的应用”和“人类与机器”。ot对人工智能及其在实践中的能力有不同程度的理解,并对人工智能在实践中的应用持开放态度。尽管道德问题必须得到解决,但非政府组织并不认为人工智能会对就业构成威胁。结论:ot有能力实施和指导技术采用的政策变化,并且了解他们当前的观点可以为倡导该领域的变化创造机会。为了更好地为临床应用人工智能做好准备,需要进一步的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opinions and Perspectives of Canadian Occupational Therapists on Artificial Intelligence.

Background: Technology is rapidly being developed to improve healthcare outcomes. However, the attitudes and perceptions of occupational therapists (OTs) on artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare are not yet known. Purpose: This study aims to: explore Canadian OTs' (a) understanding and knowledge on AI, (b) opinions and perspectives on AI, and (c) perceptions of potential benefits and risks AI might bring to occupational therapy practice in Canada. Method: A sequential explanatory mixed method approach was used to gather perspectives of Canadian registered OTs. Two hundred and eighty-two survey respondents and 15 focus group participants took part in the study. Findings: Three main themes emerged: "AI Knowledge and Implementation," "Use of AI in Occupational Therapy," and "Human vs. Machine." OTs have various levels of understanding of AI, and its capabilities within practice and are open to AI use in practice. Although ethical concerns must be addressed, OTs do not perceive AI to pose a threat to employment. Conclusion: OTs have the ability to implement and guide policy changes for technology adoption, and understanding their current perspectives creates opportunities to advocate for change in the field. Further education is needed to better prepare professionals for clinical usage of AI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy was first published in September 1933. Since that time, it has fostered advancement and growth in occupational therapy scholarship. The mission of the journal is to provide a forum for leading-edge occupational therapy scholarship that advances theory, practice, research, and policy. The vision is to be a high-quality scholarly journal that is at the forefront of the science of occupational therapy and a destination journal for the top scholars in the field, globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信