不同蒸煮方式对镉胁迫下白菜Cd含量的影响及健康风险评价

Nannan Jing, Ke Liu, Li Long, Lili Zhang
{"title":"不同蒸煮方式对镉胁迫下白菜Cd含量的影响及健康风险评价","authors":"Nannan Jing, Ke Liu, Li Long, Lili Zhang","doi":"10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different cooking and processing methods to some extent influence the content of food elements. Karst plateau mountainous region has a significant geochemical high background of Cd.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to explore the differences in health risks associated with different cooking methods for cabbage and provide a theoretical basis for safe production of cabbage in karst area and the reduction of consumption-related risks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Select three varieties of cabbage [Chi bai er hao (CB), Chun xin huo guo wang (CX), Qing cui chi bai cai (QC)] and use three different cooking methods to cook cabbage according to the cooking habits of local residents (raw, boiled, and fried) on the Cd content of cabbage were studied. The cabbages were grown in soil dosed with known amounts of Cd.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cd content in cabbage significantly increased (P < 0.05) with the increase of exogenous Cd levels. The Cd content of cooked cabbage was significantly lower than that of raw cabbage (P < 0.05). The general rule was raw > stir-fried > boiled. The target hazard quotient (THQ) of cabbage consumption by local residents was found to be QC > CX > CB, and the THQ of different cooking methods was raw > stir-fried > boiled.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Residents of the Karst region should choose vegetables that have Cd content below the limit standard and adopt reasonable cooking methods to reduce health risks. Compared to raw, the cooking method of boiling is the most effective, followed by stir-fried.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Commonly planted cabbage varieties in karst area; effects of different cooking methods on cadmium content in cabbage; health risk assessment of cabbage cooking methods on different consumer groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":94064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AOAC International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Different Cooking Methods on Cd Content and Health Risk Assessment of Cabbage Under Cd Stress.\",\"authors\":\"Nannan Jing, Ke Liu, Li Long, Lili Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different cooking and processing methods to some extent influence the content of food elements. Karst plateau mountainous region has a significant geochemical high background of Cd.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to explore the differences in health risks associated with different cooking methods for cabbage and provide a theoretical basis for safe production of cabbage in karst area and the reduction of consumption-related risks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Select three varieties of cabbage [Chi bai er hao (CB), Chun xin huo guo wang (CX), Qing cui chi bai cai (QC)] and use three different cooking methods to cook cabbage according to the cooking habits of local residents (raw, boiled, and fried) on the Cd content of cabbage were studied. The cabbages were grown in soil dosed with known amounts of Cd.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cd content in cabbage significantly increased (P < 0.05) with the increase of exogenous Cd levels. The Cd content of cooked cabbage was significantly lower than that of raw cabbage (P < 0.05). The general rule was raw > stir-fried > boiled. The target hazard quotient (THQ) of cabbage consumption by local residents was found to be QC > CX > CB, and the THQ of different cooking methods was raw > stir-fried > boiled.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Residents of the Karst region should choose vegetables that have Cd content below the limit standard and adopt reasonable cooking methods to reduce health risks. Compared to raw, the cooking method of boiling is the most effective, followed by stir-fried.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Commonly planted cabbage varieties in karst area; effects of different cooking methods on cadmium content in cabbage; health risk assessment of cabbage cooking methods on different consumer groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of AOAC International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of AOAC International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AOAC International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不同的烹调和加工方法会在一定程度上影响食物中元素的含量。喀斯特高原山区具有显著的cd地球化学高背景。目的:探讨不同烹饪方法对大白菜健康风险的影响差异,为喀斯特地区大白菜安全生产和降低食用相关风险提供理论依据。方法:选取3个品种的白菜[赤白二好(CB)、春心火锅旺(CX)、青翠赤白菜(QC)],根据当地居民的烹饪习惯,采用3种不同的烹饪方法(生、煮、炒)对白菜中的镉含量进行研究。结果:白菜中Cd的含量显著提高(P炒比0煮)。当地居民食用白菜的目标危害商(THQ)为QC > CX > CB,不同烹饪方法的THQ为生>爆炒>水煮。结论:喀斯特地区居民应选择Cd含量低于限量标准的蔬菜,并采用合理的烹调方法,以降低健康风险。与生食相比,煮的方法最有效,其次是爆炒。亮点:喀斯特地区常用白菜品种;不同烹调方法对白菜中镉含量的影响白菜烹调方法对不同消费群体的健康风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Different Cooking Methods on Cd Content and Health Risk Assessment of Cabbage Under Cd Stress.

Background: Different cooking and processing methods to some extent influence the content of food elements. Karst plateau mountainous region has a significant geochemical high background of Cd.

Objective: The study aims to explore the differences in health risks associated with different cooking methods for cabbage and provide a theoretical basis for safe production of cabbage in karst area and the reduction of consumption-related risks.

Methods: Select three varieties of cabbage [Chi bai er hao (CB), Chun xin huo guo wang (CX), Qing cui chi bai cai (QC)] and use three different cooking methods to cook cabbage according to the cooking habits of local residents (raw, boiled, and fried) on the Cd content of cabbage were studied. The cabbages were grown in soil dosed with known amounts of Cd.

Results: Cd content in cabbage significantly increased (P < 0.05) with the increase of exogenous Cd levels. The Cd content of cooked cabbage was significantly lower than that of raw cabbage (P < 0.05). The general rule was raw > stir-fried > boiled. The target hazard quotient (THQ) of cabbage consumption by local residents was found to be QC > CX > CB, and the THQ of different cooking methods was raw > stir-fried > boiled.

Conclusion: Residents of the Karst region should choose vegetables that have Cd content below the limit standard and adopt reasonable cooking methods to reduce health risks. Compared to raw, the cooking method of boiling is the most effective, followed by stir-fried.

Highlights: Commonly planted cabbage varieties in karst area; effects of different cooking methods on cadmium content in cabbage; health risk assessment of cabbage cooking methods on different consumer groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信