社会联系还是孤独?我们如何界定这个问题可能会对公共政策产生重大影响。

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Julianne Holt-Lunstad
{"title":"社会联系还是孤独?我们如何界定这个问题可能会对公共政策产生重大影响。","authors":"Julianne Holt-Lunstad","doi":"10.1037/hea0001433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasing public concerns about loneliness have led to a surge in scientific research, advocacy, and governmental attention. National strategies are being considered, legislation is introduced, and some countries have even appointed political positions dedicated to addressing loneliness. The evidence points to several markers of degree of social connection, all independently predicting health. Loneliness is among these predictors of health outcomes but not the strongest. Thus, the evidence does not support prioritizing an overly narrow approach to public health policy, national measurement, clinical assessments, or solutions. Taking a more holistic multifactorial approach to framing this public health issue by prioritizing social connection may increase the likelihood of success of public health approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55066,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology","volume":"44 5","pages":"560-562"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social connection or loneliness? How we frame the issue may significantly impact public policy.\",\"authors\":\"Julianne Holt-Lunstad\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/hea0001433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Increasing public concerns about loneliness have led to a surge in scientific research, advocacy, and governmental attention. National strategies are being considered, legislation is introduced, and some countries have even appointed political positions dedicated to addressing loneliness. The evidence points to several markers of degree of social connection, all independently predicting health. Loneliness is among these predictors of health outcomes but not the strongest. Thus, the evidence does not support prioritizing an overly narrow approach to public health policy, national measurement, clinical assessments, or solutions. Taking a more holistic multifactorial approach to framing this public health issue by prioritizing social connection may increase the likelihood of success of public health approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\"44 5\",\"pages\":\"560-562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001433\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001433","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公众对孤独的日益关注导致了科学研究、倡导和政府关注的激增。正在考虑国家战略,引入立法,一些国家甚至任命了专门解决孤独问题的政治职位。证据指向了社会联系程度的几个标志,它们都独立地预测着健康。孤独是这些健康结果的预测因素之一,但不是最强的。因此,证据不支持在公共卫生政策、国家测量、临床评估或解决方案中优先采用过于狭隘的方法。通过优先考虑社会联系,采取更全面的多因素方法来构建这一公共卫生问题,可能会增加公共卫生方法成功的可能性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social connection or loneliness? How we frame the issue may significantly impact public policy.

Increasing public concerns about loneliness have led to a surge in scientific research, advocacy, and governmental attention. National strategies are being considered, legislation is introduced, and some countries have even appointed political positions dedicated to addressing loneliness. The evidence points to several markers of degree of social connection, all independently predicting health. Loneliness is among these predictors of health outcomes but not the strongest. Thus, the evidence does not support prioritizing an overly narrow approach to public health policy, national measurement, clinical assessments, or solutions. Taking a more holistic multifactorial approach to framing this public health issue by prioritizing social connection may increase the likelihood of success of public health approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology
Health Psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology publishes articles on psychological, biobehavioral, social, and environmental factors in physical health and medical illness, and other issues in health psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信