多任务知觉学习中的顺行干扰。

IF 3 1区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jia Yang, Fang-Fang Yan, Tingting Wang, Zile Wang, Qingshang Ma, Jinmei Xiao, Xianyuan Yang, Zhong-Lin Lu, Chang-Bing Huang
{"title":"多任务知觉学习中的顺行干扰。","authors":"Jia Yang, Fang-Fang Yan, Tingting Wang, Zile Wang, Qingshang Ma, Jinmei Xiao, Xianyuan Yang, Zhong-Lin Lu, Chang-Bing Huang","doi":"10.1038/s41539-025-00312-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Learning to perform multiple tasks robustly is a crucial facet of human intelligence, yet its mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we formulated four hypotheses concerning task interactions and investigated them by analyzing training sequence effects through a continual learning framework. Forty-nine subjects learned seven tasks sequentially, each of the seven groups following a distinct sequence. Results showed that subjects learning a task later in a sequence exhibited poorer performance in six tasks (Contrast, Vernier, Face, Motion, Auditory, and N-back tasks, except for the Shape task) compared to those who learned this task earlier. Interestingly, sequence position had minimal impact on forgetting. A complementary dual-task experiment corroborated these findings. Through detailed analyses of session and block learning curves, we revealed task-specific anterograde interference, but no retrograde interference. These findings support the integrated reweighting theory and shed light on the meta-plasticity mechanism governing how human brain balances plasticity and stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48503,"journal":{"name":"npj Science of Learning","volume":"10 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anterograde interference in multitask perceptual learning.\",\"authors\":\"Jia Yang, Fang-Fang Yan, Tingting Wang, Zile Wang, Qingshang Ma, Jinmei Xiao, Xianyuan Yang, Zhong-Lin Lu, Chang-Bing Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41539-025-00312-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Learning to perform multiple tasks robustly is a crucial facet of human intelligence, yet its mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we formulated four hypotheses concerning task interactions and investigated them by analyzing training sequence effects through a continual learning framework. Forty-nine subjects learned seven tasks sequentially, each of the seven groups following a distinct sequence. Results showed that subjects learning a task later in a sequence exhibited poorer performance in six tasks (Contrast, Vernier, Face, Motion, Auditory, and N-back tasks, except for the Shape task) compared to those who learned this task earlier. Interestingly, sequence position had minimal impact on forgetting. A complementary dual-task experiment corroborated these findings. Through detailed analyses of session and block learning curves, we revealed task-specific anterograde interference, but no retrograde interference. These findings support the integrated reweighting theory and shed light on the meta-plasticity mechanism governing how human brain balances plasticity and stability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"npj Science of Learning\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064804/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"npj Science of Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00312-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Science of Learning","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00312-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学习稳健地执行多项任务是人类智能的一个重要方面,但其机制仍然难以捉摸。在此,我们提出了关于任务交互的四个假设,并通过持续学习框架分析了训练序列效应。49名受试者按顺序学习了7项任务,每一组都遵循不同的顺序。结果显示,与较早学习任务的受试者相比,较晚学习任务的受试者在六个任务(对比、游标、面部、运动、听觉和N-back任务,形状任务除外)中的表现较差。有趣的是,序列位置对遗忘的影响最小。一项补充性的双任务实验证实了这些发现。通过详细分析会话和块学习曲线,我们发现了特定任务的顺行干扰,但没有逆行干扰。这些发现支持了综合再加权理论,并揭示了控制人脑如何平衡可塑性和稳定性的元可塑性机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Anterograde interference in multitask perceptual learning.

Anterograde interference in multitask perceptual learning.

Anterograde interference in multitask perceptual learning.

Anterograde interference in multitask perceptual learning.

Learning to perform multiple tasks robustly is a crucial facet of human intelligence, yet its mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we formulated four hypotheses concerning task interactions and investigated them by analyzing training sequence effects through a continual learning framework. Forty-nine subjects learned seven tasks sequentially, each of the seven groups following a distinct sequence. Results showed that subjects learning a task later in a sequence exhibited poorer performance in six tasks (Contrast, Vernier, Face, Motion, Auditory, and N-back tasks, except for the Shape task) compared to those who learned this task earlier. Interestingly, sequence position had minimal impact on forgetting. A complementary dual-task experiment corroborated these findings. Through detailed analyses of session and block learning curves, we revealed task-specific anterograde interference, but no retrograde interference. These findings support the integrated reweighting theory and shed light on the meta-plasticity mechanism governing how human brain balances plasticity and stability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信