黄斑病变视网膜偏心优先位点的高分辨率成像与固定分析。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Olubayo U Kolawole, Ethan Bensinger, Jessica Wong, Nicholas Rinella, Katharina G Foote, Hao Zhou, Ruikang K Wang, Jacque L Duncan, Austin Roorda
{"title":"黄斑病变视网膜偏心优先位点的高分辨率成像与固定分析。","authors":"Olubayo U Kolawole, Ethan Bensinger, Jessica Wong, Nicholas Rinella, Katharina G Foote, Hao Zhou, Ruikang K Wang, Jacque L Duncan, Austin Roorda","doi":"10.1167/iovs.66.5.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to characterize the preferred retinal locus (PRL) structure and fixational eye movements in eyes with macular atrophy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four participants (1 each with macular atrophy due to congenital rubella, Best macular dystrophy, cuticular drusen with macular atrophy, and Stargardt disease) were studied using adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO), optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography (OCT-A), and microperimetry. Imaging sessions were repeated in three of the four participants. PRL and fixation stability were measured with AOSLO. Fixation stability was compared with healthy participants and participants with RHO- and USH2A-related retinitis pigmentosa (RP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PRL in participants with eccentric fixation was 0.44 to 1.92 degrees from the anatomic fovea and visual acuity was 20/40 or better. Cones at the PRL were not visible in confocal images, despite normal-appearing and more sensitive cones at greater eccentricities. OCT at the PRL showed intact external limiting membranes but hyporeflective and disrupted inner-segment outer-segment junctions. Fixation stability in participants with eccentric PRLs was no worse than participants with RP, all with foveal PRLs. The eccentric PRL group and the USH2A group with worse visual acuity (20/30 to 20/50) had fixation stabilities that were worse than the healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants adopt eccentric PRLs with hyporeflective cones and reduced sensitivity despite more sensitive and normal-appearing cones at greater eccentricities, suggesting that foveal proximity is prioritized over cone integrity in establishing a PRL. Fixation stability was similar among the four participants with eccentric fixation and those with RP, indicating that small shifts in the PRL from the anatomic fovea in our participants do not make fixation less stable.</p>","PeriodicalId":14620,"journal":{"name":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","volume":"66 5","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068526/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High Resolution Imaging and Fixation Analysis of Eccentric Preferred Retinal Loci in Macular Diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Olubayo U Kolawole, Ethan Bensinger, Jessica Wong, Nicholas Rinella, Katharina G Foote, Hao Zhou, Ruikang K Wang, Jacque L Duncan, Austin Roorda\",\"doi\":\"10.1167/iovs.66.5.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to characterize the preferred retinal locus (PRL) structure and fixational eye movements in eyes with macular atrophy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four participants (1 each with macular atrophy due to congenital rubella, Best macular dystrophy, cuticular drusen with macular atrophy, and Stargardt disease) were studied using adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO), optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography (OCT-A), and microperimetry. Imaging sessions were repeated in three of the four participants. PRL and fixation stability were measured with AOSLO. Fixation stability was compared with healthy participants and participants with RHO- and USH2A-related retinitis pigmentosa (RP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PRL in participants with eccentric fixation was 0.44 to 1.92 degrees from the anatomic fovea and visual acuity was 20/40 or better. Cones at the PRL were not visible in confocal images, despite normal-appearing and more sensitive cones at greater eccentricities. OCT at the PRL showed intact external limiting membranes but hyporeflective and disrupted inner-segment outer-segment junctions. Fixation stability in participants with eccentric PRLs was no worse than participants with RP, all with foveal PRLs. The eccentric PRL group and the USH2A group with worse visual acuity (20/30 to 20/50) had fixation stabilities that were worse than the healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants adopt eccentric PRLs with hyporeflective cones and reduced sensitivity despite more sensitive and normal-appearing cones at greater eccentricities, suggesting that foveal proximity is prioritized over cone integrity in establishing a PRL. Fixation stability was similar among the four participants with eccentric fixation and those with RP, indicating that small shifts in the PRL from the anatomic fovea in our participants do not make fixation less stable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science\",\"volume\":\"66 5\",\"pages\":\"18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068526/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.66.5.18\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.66.5.18","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究黄斑萎缩眼的首选视网膜轨迹(PRL)结构和眼球固定运动特征。方法:采用自适应光学扫描光检(AOSLO)、光学相干断层扫描(OCT)、OCT血管造影(OCT- a)和显微视野检查对4例(先天性风疹、Best黄斑营养不良、黄斑萎缩、Stargardt病所致黄斑萎缩各1例)进行研究。四名参与者中有三名重复了影像学检查。用AOSLO法测定PRL和固定稳定性。比较了健康受试者和RHO-和ush2a相关性色素性视网膜炎(RP)受试者的固定稳定性。结果:偏心固定者的PRL距解剖中央凹0.44 ~ 1.92度,视力在20/40以上。在共聚焦图像中,PRL的锥体是不可见的,尽管在较大的偏心率处有正常的和更敏感的锥体。PRL OCT显示外限制膜完整,但内节段外节段连接低反射和断裂。偏心prl患者的固定稳定性并不比RP患者差,均为中央凹prl。偏心PRL组和视力较差(20/30 ~ 20/50)的USH2A组固定稳定性较健康对照差。结论:参与者采用了偏心性PRL,其锥体反射较低,灵敏度较低,尽管锥体在较大的偏心性下更为敏感和正常,这表明在建立PRL时,中央凹的接近性优先于锥体的完整性。偏心固定的4名参与者与RP固定的4名参与者的固定稳定性相似,这表明在我们的参与者中,PRL从解剖性中央凹的微小移动并不会使固定不稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High Resolution Imaging and Fixation Analysis of Eccentric Preferred Retinal Loci in Macular Diseases.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to characterize the preferred retinal locus (PRL) structure and fixational eye movements in eyes with macular atrophy.

Methods: Four participants (1 each with macular atrophy due to congenital rubella, Best macular dystrophy, cuticular drusen with macular atrophy, and Stargardt disease) were studied using adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO), optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography (OCT-A), and microperimetry. Imaging sessions were repeated in three of the four participants. PRL and fixation stability were measured with AOSLO. Fixation stability was compared with healthy participants and participants with RHO- and USH2A-related retinitis pigmentosa (RP).

Results: The PRL in participants with eccentric fixation was 0.44 to 1.92 degrees from the anatomic fovea and visual acuity was 20/40 or better. Cones at the PRL were not visible in confocal images, despite normal-appearing and more sensitive cones at greater eccentricities. OCT at the PRL showed intact external limiting membranes but hyporeflective and disrupted inner-segment outer-segment junctions. Fixation stability in participants with eccentric PRLs was no worse than participants with RP, all with foveal PRLs. The eccentric PRL group and the USH2A group with worse visual acuity (20/30 to 20/50) had fixation stabilities that were worse than the healthy controls.

Conclusions: Participants adopt eccentric PRLs with hyporeflective cones and reduced sensitivity despite more sensitive and normal-appearing cones at greater eccentricities, suggesting that foveal proximity is prioritized over cone integrity in establishing a PRL. Fixation stability was similar among the four participants with eccentric fixation and those with RP, indicating that small shifts in the PRL from the anatomic fovea in our participants do not make fixation less stable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
339
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IOVS), published as ready online, is a peer-reviewed academic journal of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). IOVS features original research, mostly pertaining to clinical and laboratory ophthalmology and vision research in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信