基于胚胎起源和骨化模式的颅面骨密度的比较分析。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Seok Woo Hong, Kyung Jae Yoon, Jeong-Hyun Kang
{"title":"基于胚胎起源和骨化模式的颅面骨密度的比较分析。","authors":"Seok Woo Hong, Kyung Jae Yoon, Jeong-Hyun Kang","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Bones develop from various embryonic origins and are formed through either endochondral or intramembranous ossification. This study aimed to explore how bone density varies across bones with different embryonic origins and ossification processes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 43 participants (12 males; mean age 68.3 ± 9.9 years) with a history of falls and suspected facial and wrist fractures were included. Participants were subsequently divided into three groups based on levels of osteoporosis based on the T-score of the areal bone density (aBMD) at the femoral neck. aBMD was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) of the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine. Bone densities of the distal radius, hyoid, and craniofacial bones, including mandible, maxilla, frontal, parietal, zygomatic, and temporal bones were assessed using 3D reconstructed computed tomography images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average Hounsfield Unit of the reconstructed distal radius model varies significantly across osteoporosis levels. However, no significant differences were found in the craniofacial bones or hyoid bone models. Significant correlations were identified between bone densities of the axial and appendicular skeletons. In contrast, the craniofacial bones exhibited strong internal correlations but minimal associations with those of axial or appendicular bones, revealing distinct bone density patterns influenced by embryonic origin and ossification processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different embryonic origins and ossification processes give rise to distinct bone density patterns. These results underscore the importance of careful considerations beyond DEXA outcomes when predicting fracture risk or planning the procedures involving bone preparation, particularly in craniofacial regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of craniofacial bone density based on embryonic origin and ossification patterns.\",\"authors\":\"Seok Woo Hong, Kyung Jae Yoon, Jeong-Hyun Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Bones develop from various embryonic origins and are formed through either endochondral or intramembranous ossification. This study aimed to explore how bone density varies across bones with different embryonic origins and ossification processes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 43 participants (12 males; mean age 68.3 ± 9.9 years) with a history of falls and suspected facial and wrist fractures were included. Participants were subsequently divided into three groups based on levels of osteoporosis based on the T-score of the areal bone density (aBMD) at the femoral neck. aBMD was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) of the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine. Bone densities of the distal radius, hyoid, and craniofacial bones, including mandible, maxilla, frontal, parietal, zygomatic, and temporal bones were assessed using 3D reconstructed computed tomography images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average Hounsfield Unit of the reconstructed distal radius model varies significantly across osteoporosis levels. However, no significant differences were found in the craniofacial bones or hyoid bone models. Significant correlations were identified between bone densities of the axial and appendicular skeletons. In contrast, the craniofacial bones exhibited strong internal correlations but minimal associations with those of axial or appendicular bones, revealing distinct bone density patterns influenced by embryonic origin and ossification processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different embryonic origins and ossification processes give rise to distinct bone density patterns. These results underscore the importance of careful considerations beyond DEXA outcomes when predicting fracture risk or planning the procedures involving bone preparation, particularly in craniofacial regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102388\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102388\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:骨从不同的胚胎起源发育,并通过软骨内或膜内骨化形成。本研究旨在探讨不同胚胎起源和骨化过程的骨密度是如何变化的。材料与方法:共43例受试者(男性12例;平均年龄68.3±9.9岁,有跌倒史,疑似面部和腕部骨折。参与者随后根据骨质疏松程度根据股骨颈面骨密度(aBMD)的t评分分为三组。aBMD采用全髋关节、股骨颈和腰椎的双能x线吸收仪(DEXA)测量。桡骨远端、舌骨和颅面骨(包括下颌骨、上颌骨、额骨、顶骨、颧骨和颞骨)的骨密度采用三维重建计算机断层扫描图像进行评估。结果:重建桡骨远端模型的平均Hounsfield单位在不同的骨质疏松程度有显著差异。然而,在颅面骨和舌骨模型中没有发现显著差异。轴骨和尾骨的骨密度之间存在显著的相关性。相比之下,颅面骨表现出强烈的内部相关性,但与轴骨或阑尾骨的相关性很小,揭示了受胚胎起源和骨化过程影响的不同骨密度模式。结论:不同的胚胎来源和骨化过程导致不同的骨密度模式。这些结果强调了在预测骨折风险或计划涉及骨准备的手术时,特别是在颅面区域,仔细考虑DEXA结果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative analysis of craniofacial bone density based on embryonic origin and ossification patterns.

Objective: Bones develop from various embryonic origins and are formed through either endochondral or intramembranous ossification. This study aimed to explore how bone density varies across bones with different embryonic origins and ossification processes.

Materials and methods: A total of 43 participants (12 males; mean age 68.3 ± 9.9 years) with a history of falls and suspected facial and wrist fractures were included. Participants were subsequently divided into three groups based on levels of osteoporosis based on the T-score of the areal bone density (aBMD) at the femoral neck. aBMD was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) of the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine. Bone densities of the distal radius, hyoid, and craniofacial bones, including mandible, maxilla, frontal, parietal, zygomatic, and temporal bones were assessed using 3D reconstructed computed tomography images.

Results: The average Hounsfield Unit of the reconstructed distal radius model varies significantly across osteoporosis levels. However, no significant differences were found in the craniofacial bones or hyoid bone models. Significant correlations were identified between bone densities of the axial and appendicular skeletons. In contrast, the craniofacial bones exhibited strong internal correlations but minimal associations with those of axial or appendicular bones, revealing distinct bone density patterns influenced by embryonic origin and ossification processes.

Conclusion: Different embryonic origins and ossification processes give rise to distinct bone density patterns. These results underscore the importance of careful considerations beyond DEXA outcomes when predicting fracture risk or planning the procedures involving bone preparation, particularly in craniofacial regions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
305
期刊介绍: J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics. Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must: Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise; Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research; Be solely the work of the author(s) stated; Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal; Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed. Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision. The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信