{"title":"基于胚胎起源和骨化模式的颅面骨密度的比较分析。","authors":"Seok Woo Hong, Kyung Jae Yoon, Jeong-Hyun Kang","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Bones develop from various embryonic origins and are formed through either endochondral or intramembranous ossification. This study aimed to explore how bone density varies across bones with different embryonic origins and ossification processes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 43 participants (12 males; mean age 68.3 ± 9.9 years) with a history of falls and suspected facial and wrist fractures were included. Participants were subsequently divided into three groups based on levels of osteoporosis based on the T-score of the areal bone density (aBMD) at the femoral neck. aBMD was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) of the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine. Bone densities of the distal radius, hyoid, and craniofacial bones, including mandible, maxilla, frontal, parietal, zygomatic, and temporal bones were assessed using 3D reconstructed computed tomography images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average Hounsfield Unit of the reconstructed distal radius model varies significantly across osteoporosis levels. However, no significant differences were found in the craniofacial bones or hyoid bone models. Significant correlations were identified between bone densities of the axial and appendicular skeletons. In contrast, the craniofacial bones exhibited strong internal correlations but minimal associations with those of axial or appendicular bones, revealing distinct bone density patterns influenced by embryonic origin and ossification processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different embryonic origins and ossification processes give rise to distinct bone density patterns. These results underscore the importance of careful considerations beyond DEXA outcomes when predicting fracture risk or planning the procedures involving bone preparation, particularly in craniofacial regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of craniofacial bone density based on embryonic origin and ossification patterns.\",\"authors\":\"Seok Woo Hong, Kyung Jae Yoon, Jeong-Hyun Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Bones develop from various embryonic origins and are formed through either endochondral or intramembranous ossification. This study aimed to explore how bone density varies across bones with different embryonic origins and ossification processes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 43 participants (12 males; mean age 68.3 ± 9.9 years) with a history of falls and suspected facial and wrist fractures were included. Participants were subsequently divided into three groups based on levels of osteoporosis based on the T-score of the areal bone density (aBMD) at the femoral neck. aBMD was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) of the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine. Bone densities of the distal radius, hyoid, and craniofacial bones, including mandible, maxilla, frontal, parietal, zygomatic, and temporal bones were assessed using 3D reconstructed computed tomography images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average Hounsfield Unit of the reconstructed distal radius model varies significantly across osteoporosis levels. However, no significant differences were found in the craniofacial bones or hyoid bone models. Significant correlations were identified between bone densities of the axial and appendicular skeletons. In contrast, the craniofacial bones exhibited strong internal correlations but minimal associations with those of axial or appendicular bones, revealing distinct bone density patterns influenced by embryonic origin and ossification processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different embryonic origins and ossification processes give rise to distinct bone density patterns. These results underscore the importance of careful considerations beyond DEXA outcomes when predicting fracture risk or planning the procedures involving bone preparation, particularly in craniofacial regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102388\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102388\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative analysis of craniofacial bone density based on embryonic origin and ossification patterns.
Objective: Bones develop from various embryonic origins and are formed through either endochondral or intramembranous ossification. This study aimed to explore how bone density varies across bones with different embryonic origins and ossification processes.
Materials and methods: A total of 43 participants (12 males; mean age 68.3 ± 9.9 years) with a history of falls and suspected facial and wrist fractures were included. Participants were subsequently divided into three groups based on levels of osteoporosis based on the T-score of the areal bone density (aBMD) at the femoral neck. aBMD was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) of the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine. Bone densities of the distal radius, hyoid, and craniofacial bones, including mandible, maxilla, frontal, parietal, zygomatic, and temporal bones were assessed using 3D reconstructed computed tomography images.
Results: The average Hounsfield Unit of the reconstructed distal radius model varies significantly across osteoporosis levels. However, no significant differences were found in the craniofacial bones or hyoid bone models. Significant correlations were identified between bone densities of the axial and appendicular skeletons. In contrast, the craniofacial bones exhibited strong internal correlations but minimal associations with those of axial or appendicular bones, revealing distinct bone density patterns influenced by embryonic origin and ossification processes.
Conclusion: Different embryonic origins and ossification processes give rise to distinct bone density patterns. These results underscore the importance of careful considerations beyond DEXA outcomes when predicting fracture risk or planning the procedures involving bone preparation, particularly in craniofacial regions.
期刊介绍:
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics.
Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must:
Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise;
Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research;
Be solely the work of the author(s) stated;
Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal;
Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.