通过皮质和外周体感刺激调节运动皮质的可塑性。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-07 DOI:10.1152/jn.00600.2024
Shancheng Bao, Yuming Lei
{"title":"通过皮质和外周体感刺激调节运动皮质的可塑性。","authors":"Shancheng Bao, Yuming Lei","doi":"10.1152/jn.00600.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The interaction between the motor and somatosensory systems is essential for effective motor control, with evidence indicating that somatosensory stimulation influences the excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1). However, the mechanisms by which repetitive stimulation of both cortical and peripheral somatosensory systems affects M1 plasticity are not well understood. To investigate this, we examined the effects of continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) applied to the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of the median nerve on various measures of corticospinal excitability and M1 intracortical circuits. Specifically, we assessed motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), short-latency intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), and short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) before and after administering cTBS and TENS. Our results demonstrated that cTBS increased MEPs for at least 50 min, whereas TENS increased MEPs for 10 min. Neither cTBS nor TENS had an impact on SICI and ICF. However, cTBS decreased SAI, whereas TENS did not affect SAI. The sham procedures for both cTBS and TENS did not produce significant changes in MEPs, SICI, ICF, or SAI. These findings suggest that both cortical and peripheral somatosensory stimulation modulate corticospinal excitability, with the effects of cortical stimulation being more prolonged. Neither type of stimulation influences inhibitory and excitatory intracortical neural circuitry within M1. Notably, cortical somatosensory stimulation modulates the interaction between M1 and S1, whereas peripheral somatosensory stimulation does not. This study elucidates distinct mechanisms through which cortical and peripheral somatosensory stimulation influence M1 plasticity.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study identifies distinct mechanisms through which cortical and peripheral somatosensory stimulation influence motor cortex (M1) plasticity. Both continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of the median nerve enhance corticospinal excitability, with cTBS exhibiting longer-lasting effects. Importantly, cTBS, but not TENS, modulates the interaction between M1 and S1. These findings form the basis for developing targeted somatosensory interventions aimed at modulating motor function.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1955-1966"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modulating motor cortex plasticity via cortical and peripheral somatosensory stimulation.\",\"authors\":\"Shancheng Bao, Yuming Lei\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/jn.00600.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The interaction between the motor and somatosensory systems is essential for effective motor control, with evidence indicating that somatosensory stimulation influences the excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1). However, the mechanisms by which repetitive stimulation of both cortical and peripheral somatosensory systems affects M1 plasticity are not well understood. To investigate this, we examined the effects of continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) applied to the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of the median nerve on various measures of corticospinal excitability and M1 intracortical circuits. Specifically, we assessed motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), short-latency intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), and short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) before and after administering cTBS and TENS. Our results demonstrated that cTBS increased MEPs for at least 50 min, whereas TENS increased MEPs for 10 min. Neither cTBS nor TENS had an impact on SICI and ICF. However, cTBS decreased SAI, whereas TENS did not affect SAI. The sham procedures for both cTBS and TENS did not produce significant changes in MEPs, SICI, ICF, or SAI. These findings suggest that both cortical and peripheral somatosensory stimulation modulate corticospinal excitability, with the effects of cortical stimulation being more prolonged. Neither type of stimulation influences inhibitory and excitatory intracortical neural circuitry within M1. Notably, cortical somatosensory stimulation modulates the interaction between M1 and S1, whereas peripheral somatosensory stimulation does not. This study elucidates distinct mechanisms through which cortical and peripheral somatosensory stimulation influence M1 plasticity.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study identifies distinct mechanisms through which cortical and peripheral somatosensory stimulation influence motor cortex (M1) plasticity. Both continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of the median nerve enhance corticospinal excitability, with cTBS exhibiting longer-lasting effects. Importantly, cTBS, but not TENS, modulates the interaction between M1 and S1. These findings form the basis for developing targeted somatosensory interventions aimed at modulating motor function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1955-1966\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00600.2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00600.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运动和体感觉系统之间的相互作用对于有效的运动控制是必不可少的,有证据表明,体感觉刺激影响初级运动皮层(M1)的兴奋性。然而,反复刺激皮质和外周体感系统影响M1可塑性的机制尚不清楚。为了研究这一点,我们研究了应用于初级体感皮层(S1)的连续θ -burst刺激(cTBS)和经皮正中神经电刺激(TENS)对皮质脊髓兴奋性和M1皮质内回路的各种测量的影响。具体来说,我们评估了运动诱发电位(MEPs)、短潜伏期皮质内抑制(SICI)、皮质内促进(ICF)和短潜伏期传入抑制(SAI)在给予cTBS和TENS前后的作用。我们的研究结果表明,cTBS增加MEPs至少50分钟,而TENS增加MEPs 10分钟。cTBS和TENS对SICI和ICF均无影响。cTBS降低了SAI,而TENS对SAI没有影响。cTBS和TENS假手术均未对MEPs、SICI、ICF或SAI产生显著变化。这些发现表明,皮质和外周体感刺激均可调节皮质脊髓兴奋性,且皮质刺激的作用时间更长。这两种刺激都不影响M1内的抑制性和兴奋性皮质内神经回路。值得注意的是,皮质体感刺激调节M1和S1之间的相互作用,而外周体感刺激则没有。本研究阐明了皮层和外周体感刺激影响M1可塑性的不同机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modulating motor cortex plasticity via cortical and peripheral somatosensory stimulation.

The interaction between the motor and somatosensory systems is essential for effective motor control, with evidence indicating that somatosensory stimulation influences the excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1). However, the mechanisms by which repetitive stimulation of both cortical and peripheral somatosensory systems affects M1 plasticity are not well understood. To investigate this, we examined the effects of continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) applied to the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of the median nerve on various measures of corticospinal excitability and M1 intracortical circuits. Specifically, we assessed motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), short-latency intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), and short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) before and after administering cTBS and TENS. Our results demonstrated that cTBS increased MEPs for at least 50 min, whereas TENS increased MEPs for 10 min. Neither cTBS nor TENS had an impact on SICI and ICF. However, cTBS decreased SAI, whereas TENS did not affect SAI. The sham procedures for both cTBS and TENS did not produce significant changes in MEPs, SICI, ICF, or SAI. These findings suggest that both cortical and peripheral somatosensory stimulation modulate corticospinal excitability, with the effects of cortical stimulation being more prolonged. Neither type of stimulation influences inhibitory and excitatory intracortical neural circuitry within M1. Notably, cortical somatosensory stimulation modulates the interaction between M1 and S1, whereas peripheral somatosensory stimulation does not. This study elucidates distinct mechanisms through which cortical and peripheral somatosensory stimulation influence M1 plasticity.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study identifies distinct mechanisms through which cortical and peripheral somatosensory stimulation influence motor cortex (M1) plasticity. Both continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of the median nerve enhance corticospinal excitability, with cTBS exhibiting longer-lasting effects. Importantly, cTBS, but not TENS, modulates the interaction between M1 and S1. These findings form the basis for developing targeted somatosensory interventions aimed at modulating motor function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信