生物计量参数和测量技术对眼放大倍率的评估:一项前瞻性研究。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Serhat Ermis, Ece Özal, Emrullah Simsek, Özlem Tastan, Murat Karapapak
{"title":"生物计量参数和测量技术对眼放大倍率的评估:一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"Serhat Ermis, Ece Özal, Emrullah Simsek, Özlem Tastan, Murat Karapapak","doi":"10.1167/iovs.66.4.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of factors such as axial length (AL), spherical equivalent (SE), and keratometry (K) on longitudinal and lateral magnification and their impact on Bruch's membrane opening (BMO)-fovea distance and central foveal thickness (CFT) measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cross-sectional study included 437 eyes of 437 healthy participants aged 18 to 50 years with best corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Participants were divided into three groups according to their refractive status: myopia (< -0.50 diopters [D]), emmetropia (-0.50 to +0.50 D), and hypermetropia (>+0.50 D). BMO-fovea distance and CFT were measured using a Topcon swept-source optical coherence tomography SS-OCT device, first without taking into account the magnification of the eye and then by incorporating individual AL, SE, and K into the system. Measurement errors greater than 5% were considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Longitudinal and lateral magnification affected BMO-fovea distance and CFT differently. Image size correction was required in 60% of BMO-fovea and 41% of CFT measurements. BMO-fovea distance was significantly influenced by lateral magnification, whereas CFT remained largely unchanged, indicating its primary association with longitudinal magnification. The highest correction need was observed in hypermetropic (87.7%) and short AL eyes (66.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It has been demonstrated that BMO-fovea distance is sensitive to lateral magnification, whereas CFT is mainly affected by longitudinal magnification. Neglecting these effects, particularly in hypermetropic and short AL eyes, may lead to significant measurement errors. These findings highlight the necessity of considering both longitudinal and lateral magnification corrections in retinal imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":14620,"journal":{"name":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","volume":"66 4","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Ocular Magnification in Relation to Biometric Parameters and Measurement Techniques: A Prospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Serhat Ermis, Ece Özal, Emrullah Simsek, Özlem Tastan, Murat Karapapak\",\"doi\":\"10.1167/iovs.66.4.57\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of factors such as axial length (AL), spherical equivalent (SE), and keratometry (K) on longitudinal and lateral magnification and their impact on Bruch's membrane opening (BMO)-fovea distance and central foveal thickness (CFT) measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cross-sectional study included 437 eyes of 437 healthy participants aged 18 to 50 years with best corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Participants were divided into three groups according to their refractive status: myopia (< -0.50 diopters [D]), emmetropia (-0.50 to +0.50 D), and hypermetropia (>+0.50 D). BMO-fovea distance and CFT were measured using a Topcon swept-source optical coherence tomography SS-OCT device, first without taking into account the magnification of the eye and then by incorporating individual AL, SE, and K into the system. Measurement errors greater than 5% were considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Longitudinal and lateral magnification affected BMO-fovea distance and CFT differently. Image size correction was required in 60% of BMO-fovea and 41% of CFT measurements. BMO-fovea distance was significantly influenced by lateral magnification, whereas CFT remained largely unchanged, indicating its primary association with longitudinal magnification. The highest correction need was observed in hypermetropic (87.7%) and short AL eyes (66.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It has been demonstrated that BMO-fovea distance is sensitive to lateral magnification, whereas CFT is mainly affected by longitudinal magnification. Neglecting these effects, particularly in hypermetropic and short AL eyes, may lead to significant measurement errors. These findings highlight the necessity of considering both longitudinal and lateral magnification corrections in retinal imaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science\",\"volume\":\"66 4\",\"pages\":\"57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020948/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.66.4.57\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.66.4.57","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估轴长(AL)、球面等效(SE)和角膜度数(K)等因素对纵向和横向放大的影响,以及它们对Bruch膜开口(BMO)-中央凹距离和中央凹厚度(CFT)测量的影响。方法:本前瞻性横断面研究纳入437名18 - 50岁最佳矫正视力为20/20或更高的健康参与者的437只眼睛。参与者根据屈光状态分为三组:近视(< -0.50屈光[D])、远视(-0.50至+0.50 D)和远视(>+0.50 D)。bmo -中央凹距离和CFT使用Topcon扫描源光学相干断层扫描SS-OCT设备测量,首先不考虑眼睛的放大倍率,然后将单独的AL, SE和K纳入系统。测量误差大于5%被认为显著。结果:纵向和横向放大对bmo -中央凹距离和CFT的影响不同。60%的bmo -中央凹和41%的CFT测量需要图像尺寸校正。bmo -中央凹距离受横向放大倍数的显著影响,而CFT基本保持不变,表明其主要与纵向放大倍数有关。远视(87.7%)和短AL眼(66.1%)的矫正需求最高。结论:bmo -中央凹距离受横向放大的影响较大,而CFT主要受纵向放大的影响。忽略这些影响,特别是远视和短眼,可能会导致显著的测量误差。这些发现强调了在视网膜成像中考虑纵向和横向放大校正的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Ocular Magnification in Relation to Biometric Parameters and Measurement Techniques: A Prospective Study.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of factors such as axial length (AL), spherical equivalent (SE), and keratometry (K) on longitudinal and lateral magnification and their impact on Bruch's membrane opening (BMO)-fovea distance and central foveal thickness (CFT) measurements.

Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study included 437 eyes of 437 healthy participants aged 18 to 50 years with best corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Participants were divided into three groups according to their refractive status: myopia (< -0.50 diopters [D]), emmetropia (-0.50 to +0.50 D), and hypermetropia (>+0.50 D). BMO-fovea distance and CFT were measured using a Topcon swept-source optical coherence tomography SS-OCT device, first without taking into account the magnification of the eye and then by incorporating individual AL, SE, and K into the system. Measurement errors greater than 5% were considered significant.

Results: Longitudinal and lateral magnification affected BMO-fovea distance and CFT differently. Image size correction was required in 60% of BMO-fovea and 41% of CFT measurements. BMO-fovea distance was significantly influenced by lateral magnification, whereas CFT remained largely unchanged, indicating its primary association with longitudinal magnification. The highest correction need was observed in hypermetropic (87.7%) and short AL eyes (66.1%).

Conclusions: It has been demonstrated that BMO-fovea distance is sensitive to lateral magnification, whereas CFT is mainly affected by longitudinal magnification. Neglecting these effects, particularly in hypermetropic and short AL eyes, may lead to significant measurement errors. These findings highlight the necessity of considering both longitudinal and lateral magnification corrections in retinal imaging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
339
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IOVS), published as ready online, is a peer-reviewed academic journal of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). IOVS features original research, mostly pertaining to clinical and laboratory ophthalmology and vision research in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信