比较有和没有自闭症谱系障碍的智力残疾者的情感发展。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Hauke Hermann, Annemieke M Witte, Anna Pöhlmann, Paula S Sterkenburg, Tanja Sappok
{"title":"比较有和没有自闭症谱系障碍的智力残疾者的情感发展。","authors":"Hauke Hermann, Annemieke M Witte, Anna Pöhlmann, Paula S Sterkenburg, Tanja Sappok","doi":"10.1111/jir.13251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intellectual disability (ID) often co-occurs with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). To better understand the needs of persons with ID/ASD, level of emotional development (ED) can be determined with the Scale of Emotional Development-Short (SED-S). This preregistered study examined differences in ED by comparing total, domain, and item scores between people with ID/ASD and people with ID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred seventy-four participants with ID/ASD were matched to 174 participants with ID only. Informants reported on the SED-S, which includes 200 yes-no items grouped into eight domains, with each domain including five stages of ED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ID/ASD group showed lower total scores (M = 2.19, SD = 0.97) compared with the ID group (M = 2.86, SD = 1.11). They also showed lower scores in all eight domains. When groups were compared based on total scores, people with ID/ASD in SED-S 2 scored lower in the domain Affect, while those in SED-S 3 scored lower in the domains Affect, Communication, and Peers compared with people with ID in the same stage. People with ID/ASD in SED-S 4 scored higher in the domain Peers compared with people with ID in the same stage. There was an uneven distribution of 'yes' responses, significant differences in 'yes' responses to 27 items, and a lower mean frequency of 'yes' responses from people with ID/ASD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although this study was largely exploratory and warrants replication, results provide an important next step towards a better understanding of the emotional needs and behaviours of people with ID/ASD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Emotional Development in Persons With Intellectual Disability With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Hauke Hermann, Annemieke M Witte, Anna Pöhlmann, Paula S Sterkenburg, Tanja Sappok\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jir.13251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intellectual disability (ID) often co-occurs with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). To better understand the needs of persons with ID/ASD, level of emotional development (ED) can be determined with the Scale of Emotional Development-Short (SED-S). This preregistered study examined differences in ED by comparing total, domain, and item scores between people with ID/ASD and people with ID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred seventy-four participants with ID/ASD were matched to 174 participants with ID only. Informants reported on the SED-S, which includes 200 yes-no items grouped into eight domains, with each domain including five stages of ED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ID/ASD group showed lower total scores (M = 2.19, SD = 0.97) compared with the ID group (M = 2.86, SD = 1.11). They also showed lower scores in all eight domains. When groups were compared based on total scores, people with ID/ASD in SED-S 2 scored lower in the domain Affect, while those in SED-S 3 scored lower in the domains Affect, Communication, and Peers compared with people with ID in the same stage. People with ID/ASD in SED-S 4 scored higher in the domain Peers compared with people with ID in the same stage. There was an uneven distribution of 'yes' responses, significant differences in 'yes' responses to 27 items, and a lower mean frequency of 'yes' responses from people with ID/ASD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although this study was largely exploratory and warrants replication, results provide an important next step towards a better understanding of the emotional needs and behaviours of people with ID/ASD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.13251\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.13251","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:智力障碍(ID)常与自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)共存。为了更好地了解ID/ASD患者的需求,情感发展水平(ED)可以用情感发展量表(SED-S)来确定。这项预先注册的研究通过比较ID/ASD患者和ID患者的总分、领域和项目得分来检查ED的差异。方法:174名ID/ASD参与者与174名ID/ASD参与者进行配对。结果:ID/ASD组的总分(M = 2.19, SD = 0.97)低于ID组(M = 2.86, SD = 1.11)。他们在所有八个领域的得分也较低。当根据总分对各组进行比较时,SED-S - 2中ID/ASD患者在情感领域得分较低,而SED-S - 3中ID/ASD患者在情感、沟通和同伴领域得分较低。在SED-S - 4中,ID/ASD患者在同侪领域的得分高于ID患者。回答“是”的分布不均匀,对27个问题的回答存在显著差异,ID/ASD患者回答“是”的平均频率较低。结论:尽管这项研究在很大程度上是探索性的,值得重复,但结果为更好地理解ID/ASD患者的情感需求和行为提供了重要的下一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Emotional Development in Persons With Intellectual Disability With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Background: Intellectual disability (ID) often co-occurs with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). To better understand the needs of persons with ID/ASD, level of emotional development (ED) can be determined with the Scale of Emotional Development-Short (SED-S). This preregistered study examined differences in ED by comparing total, domain, and item scores between people with ID/ASD and people with ID.

Methods: One hundred seventy-four participants with ID/ASD were matched to 174 participants with ID only. Informants reported on the SED-S, which includes 200 yes-no items grouped into eight domains, with each domain including five stages of ED.

Results: The ID/ASD group showed lower total scores (M = 2.19, SD = 0.97) compared with the ID group (M = 2.86, SD = 1.11). They also showed lower scores in all eight domains. When groups were compared based on total scores, people with ID/ASD in SED-S 2 scored lower in the domain Affect, while those in SED-S 3 scored lower in the domains Affect, Communication, and Peers compared with people with ID in the same stage. People with ID/ASD in SED-S 4 scored higher in the domain Peers compared with people with ID in the same stage. There was an uneven distribution of 'yes' responses, significant differences in 'yes' responses to 27 items, and a lower mean frequency of 'yes' responses from people with ID/ASD.

Conclusions: Although this study was largely exploratory and warrants replication, results provide an important next step towards a better understanding of the emotional needs and behaviours of people with ID/ASD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信