当一致性满足比喻性:一致性促进还是比喻干扰在二语搭配加工中持续存在?

IF 3.5 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jinfang Shi, Yin Zhong
{"title":"当一致性满足比喻性:一致性促进还是比喻干扰在二语搭配加工中持续存在?","authors":"Jinfang Shi, Yin Zhong","doi":"10.1111/lang.12720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study investigates whether congruency facilitation and figurative interference—two counteractive effects—persist in L2 collocational processing when both congruency and figurativeness are present. A primed lexical decision task was administered to 44 L1‐Chinese L2‐English learners and 40 L1‐English speakers to assess response times for figurative congruent collocations, along with their matched literal congruent and figurative incongruent collocations. Results showed that while collocational priming was absent, both congruency facilitation and figurative interference emerged, with their effects modulated by L2 proficiency. Specifically, in low‐proficiency learners, congruency facilitation appeared to outweigh figurative interference, whereas in high‐proficiency learners, figurative interference became more pronounced as L1‐based facilitation was suppressed. These findings suggest that L2 learners initially rely on their activated L1 semantic network but gradually shift toward developing L2 collocational representations as proficiency increases, though these representations may remain weak and insufficient to facilitate collocate access.","PeriodicalId":51371,"journal":{"name":"Language Learning","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Congruency Meets Figurativeness: Does Congruency Facilitation or Figurative Interference Persist in Second Language Collocational Processing?\",\"authors\":\"Jinfang Shi, Yin Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/lang.12720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study investigates whether congruency facilitation and figurative interference—two counteractive effects—persist in L2 collocational processing when both congruency and figurativeness are present. A primed lexical decision task was administered to 44 L1‐Chinese L2‐English learners and 40 L1‐English speakers to assess response times for figurative congruent collocations, along with their matched literal congruent and figurative incongruent collocations. Results showed that while collocational priming was absent, both congruency facilitation and figurative interference emerged, with their effects modulated by L2 proficiency. Specifically, in low‐proficiency learners, congruency facilitation appeared to outweigh figurative interference, whereas in high‐proficiency learners, figurative interference became more pronounced as L1‐based facilitation was suppressed. These findings suggest that L2 learners initially rely on their activated L1 semantic network but gradually shift toward developing L2 collocational representations as proficiency increases, though these representations may remain weak and insufficient to facilitate collocate access.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Learning\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12720\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Learning","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12720","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了在二语搭配加工中,当一致性和比喻性同时存在时,一致性促进和比喻干扰这两种反向效应是否持续存在。对44名母语-汉语二语-英语学习者和40名母语-英语使用者进行了启动词汇决策任务,以评估他们对比喻一致搭配及其匹配的字面一致搭配和比喻不一致搭配的反应时间。结果表明,在不存在搭配启动的情况下,一致性促进和比喻干扰都存在,其作用受二语熟练程度的调节。具体来说,在低水平学习者中,一致性促进作用大于比喻干扰,而在高水平学习者中,比喻干扰作用变得更加明显,因为基于L1的促进作用被抑制。这些发现表明,二语学习者最初依赖于激活的母语语义网络,但随着熟练程度的提高,逐渐转向发展二语搭配表征,尽管这些表征可能仍然很弱,不足以促进搭配访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When Congruency Meets Figurativeness: Does Congruency Facilitation or Figurative Interference Persist in Second Language Collocational Processing?
The present study investigates whether congruency facilitation and figurative interference—two counteractive effects—persist in L2 collocational processing when both congruency and figurativeness are present. A primed lexical decision task was administered to 44 L1‐Chinese L2‐English learners and 40 L1‐English speakers to assess response times for figurative congruent collocations, along with their matched literal congruent and figurative incongruent collocations. Results showed that while collocational priming was absent, both congruency facilitation and figurative interference emerged, with their effects modulated by L2 proficiency. Specifically, in low‐proficiency learners, congruency facilitation appeared to outweigh figurative interference, whereas in high‐proficiency learners, figurative interference became more pronounced as L1‐based facilitation was suppressed. These findings suggest that L2 learners initially rely on their activated L1 semantic network but gradually shift toward developing L2 collocational representations as proficiency increases, though these representations may remain weak and insufficient to facilitate collocate access.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Language Learning
Language Learning Multiple-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
15.90%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Language Learning is a scientific journal dedicated to the understanding of language learning broadly defined. It publishes research articles that systematically apply methods of inquiry from disciplines including psychology, linguistics, cognitive science, educational inquiry, neuroscience, ethnography, sociolinguistics, sociology, and anthropology. It is concerned with fundamental theoretical issues in language learning such as child, second, and foreign language acquisition, language education, bilingualism, literacy, language representation in mind and brain, culture, cognition, pragmatics, and intergroup relations. A subscription includes one or two annual supplements, alternating among a volume from the Language Learning Cognitive Neuroscience Series, the Currents in Language Learning Series or the Language Learning Special Issue Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信