Nina Pocuca, Brodie C. Dakin, Cheneal Puljević, Cameron Francis, Daniel Stjepanović, Anthony Barnett, Leanne Hides
{"title":"了解药物和酒精工作人员对药物检查障碍和促进因素的看法:一项定性研究。","authors":"Nina Pocuca, Brodie C. Dakin, Cheneal Puljević, Cameron Francis, Daniel Stjepanović, Anthony Barnett, Leanne Hides","doi":"10.1111/dar.14073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Drug checking (i.e., whereby members of the public submit a drug sample for pharmacological analysis of the drug content) is an evidence-based harm reduction tool. Despite this, the uptake of drug checking services by people who use drugs (PWUD) is often limited across different jurisdictions and types of services, highlighting the need for research examining barriers to drug checking uptake from the perspective of key stakeholders. This qualitative pre-implementation study explored the perspectives of staff employed by alcohol and other drug (AOD) organisations on drug checking, including barriers and facilitators to uptake.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Interviews were conducted with 23 AOD harm reduction and AOD treatment staff (14 female; mean age = 38.8 years, SD = 8.2). Qualitative data were analysed using iterative categorisation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Five themes were extracted from the data: (i) PWUD infrequently are most likely to access drug checking; (ii) Confidentiality and anonymity concerns are barriers to drug checking; (iii) Ease of use is integral to drug checking uptake; (iv) Safe, non-judgemental environments that include peer workers are critical; and (v) People who sell drugs will likely use drug checking.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The following factors were identified as paramount to the uptake of drug checking services among PWUD: (i) confidentiality; (ii) agreements or memoranda of understanding that protect service clients from over-policing and criminalisation; (iii) mobile and fixed-site services that are accessible to PWUD; and (iv) a non-judgemental and safe environment that includes both health professionals and peer workers with lived experience.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"44 5","pages":"1330-1338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.14073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Drug and Alcohol Staff Perspectives on the Barriers and Facilitators to Drug Checking: A Qualitative Study\",\"authors\":\"Nina Pocuca, Brodie C. Dakin, Cheneal Puljević, Cameron Francis, Daniel Stjepanović, Anthony Barnett, Leanne Hides\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dar.14073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Drug checking (i.e., whereby members of the public submit a drug sample for pharmacological analysis of the drug content) is an evidence-based harm reduction tool. Despite this, the uptake of drug checking services by people who use drugs (PWUD) is often limited across different jurisdictions and types of services, highlighting the need for research examining barriers to drug checking uptake from the perspective of key stakeholders. This qualitative pre-implementation study explored the perspectives of staff employed by alcohol and other drug (AOD) organisations on drug checking, including barriers and facilitators to uptake.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Interviews were conducted with 23 AOD harm reduction and AOD treatment staff (14 female; mean age = 38.8 years, SD = 8.2). Qualitative data were analysed using iterative categorisation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Five themes were extracted from the data: (i) PWUD infrequently are most likely to access drug checking; (ii) Confidentiality and anonymity concerns are barriers to drug checking; (iii) Ease of use is integral to drug checking uptake; (iv) Safe, non-judgemental environments that include peer workers are critical; and (v) People who sell drugs will likely use drug checking.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The following factors were identified as paramount to the uptake of drug checking services among PWUD: (i) confidentiality; (ii) agreements or memoranda of understanding that protect service clients from over-policing and criminalisation; (iii) mobile and fixed-site services that are accessible to PWUD; and (iv) a non-judgemental and safe environment that includes both health professionals and peer workers with lived experience.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"volume\":\"44 5\",\"pages\":\"1330-1338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.14073\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.14073\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.14073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding Drug and Alcohol Staff Perspectives on the Barriers and Facilitators to Drug Checking: A Qualitative Study
Introduction
Drug checking (i.e., whereby members of the public submit a drug sample for pharmacological analysis of the drug content) is an evidence-based harm reduction tool. Despite this, the uptake of drug checking services by people who use drugs (PWUD) is often limited across different jurisdictions and types of services, highlighting the need for research examining barriers to drug checking uptake from the perspective of key stakeholders. This qualitative pre-implementation study explored the perspectives of staff employed by alcohol and other drug (AOD) organisations on drug checking, including barriers and facilitators to uptake.
Methods
Interviews were conducted with 23 AOD harm reduction and AOD treatment staff (14 female; mean age = 38.8 years, SD = 8.2). Qualitative data were analysed using iterative categorisation.
Results
Five themes were extracted from the data: (i) PWUD infrequently are most likely to access drug checking; (ii) Confidentiality and anonymity concerns are barriers to drug checking; (iii) Ease of use is integral to drug checking uptake; (iv) Safe, non-judgemental environments that include peer workers are critical; and (v) People who sell drugs will likely use drug checking.
Discussion and Conclusions
The following factors were identified as paramount to the uptake of drug checking services among PWUD: (i) confidentiality; (ii) agreements or memoranda of understanding that protect service clients from over-policing and criminalisation; (iii) mobile and fixed-site services that are accessible to PWUD; and (iv) a non-judgemental and safe environment that includes both health professionals and peer workers with lived experience.
期刊介绍:
Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.