主流基因组学在英国国家卫生服务:调查了解儿科医生的准备和信心。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Rachel Griffiths, Celine Lewis
{"title":"主流基因组学在英国国家卫生服务:调查了解儿科医生的准备和信心。","authors":"Rachel Griffiths, Celine Lewis","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Health Service in the UK is the first national healthcare system to offer genomic sequencing for rare disease diagnosis as routine care. Non-genetic medical specialists, including paediatricians, can now request genomic testing for certain clinical indications. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the preparedness and confidence of paediatricians providing genomic sequencing in England. In addition, we assessed current practice, perceived utility of testing, barriers and enablers, prior genomics education and training preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 26-item electronic survey for completion by paediatric specialists. Participants were recruited through national associations and a conference. Quantitative items were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Open-ended question responses were analysed by qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>157 responses were included in the analysis. Only 49.0% reported feeling prepared for mainstreaming despite 75.0% reporting they had requested testing in the past 12 months, 47.7% indicating they had returned genomic sequencing results and 67.1% feeling genomic testing was useful. Mean confidence scores were lowest for tasks including using human phenotype ontology terminology on test request forms (3.9/10), interpreting genomic test results (4.8/10), discussing complex genomic results with patients and families (4.3/10) and integrating test results into patient care (4.7/10). Significantly higher average ranked genomic confidence was identified among those who had requested testing in the last 12 months compared with those who had not (Z=5.063, p<0.001, r=0.412). The most frequent barriers to mainstreaming were lack of training and knowledge (43.3%), determining patient eligibility (28.0%), lack of time (27.4%) and confidence (25.5%). Webinars (48.4%), followed by continued professional development meetings and/or conferences (38.9%), were the preferred mode of training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that preparedness and confidence among paediatricians in genomics is currently lacking. Support from clinical genetics services, simplified referral forms and webinar training sessions could improve current practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11987091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mainstreaming genomics in the National Health Service in England: a survey to understand preparedness and confidence among paediatricians.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Griffiths, Celine Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Health Service in the UK is the first national healthcare system to offer genomic sequencing for rare disease diagnosis as routine care. Non-genetic medical specialists, including paediatricians, can now request genomic testing for certain clinical indications. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the preparedness and confidence of paediatricians providing genomic sequencing in England. In addition, we assessed current practice, perceived utility of testing, barriers and enablers, prior genomics education and training preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 26-item electronic survey for completion by paediatric specialists. Participants were recruited through national associations and a conference. Quantitative items were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Open-ended question responses were analysed by qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>157 responses were included in the analysis. Only 49.0% reported feeling prepared for mainstreaming despite 75.0% reporting they had requested testing in the past 12 months, 47.7% indicating they had returned genomic sequencing results and 67.1% feeling genomic testing was useful. Mean confidence scores were lowest for tasks including using human phenotype ontology terminology on test request forms (3.9/10), interpreting genomic test results (4.8/10), discussing complex genomic results with patients and families (4.3/10) and integrating test results into patient care (4.7/10). Significantly higher average ranked genomic confidence was identified among those who had requested testing in the last 12 months compared with those who had not (Z=5.063, p<0.001, r=0.412). The most frequent barriers to mainstreaming were lack of training and knowledge (43.3%), determining patient eligibility (28.0%), lack of time (27.4%) and confidence (25.5%). Webinars (48.4%), followed by continued professional development meetings and/or conferences (38.9%), were the preferred mode of training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that preparedness and confidence among paediatricians in genomics is currently lacking. Support from clinical genetics services, simplified referral forms and webinar training sessions could improve current practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11987091/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003286\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003286","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:英国国家卫生服务是第一个将基因组测序作为罕见病诊断常规护理的国家卫生保健系统。包括儿科医生在内的非遗传医学专家现在可以要求对某些临床症状进行基因组检测。本研究的主要目的是评估在英国提供基因组测序的儿科医生的准备和信心。此外,我们还评估了当前的实践,测试的感知效用,障碍和使能因素,先前的基因组学教育和培训偏好。方法:一项由儿科专家完成的26项电子调查。参与者是通过国家协会和一次会议征聘的。定量项目采用描述性统计和推理统计进行分析。采用定性内容分析对开放性问题的回答进行分析。结果:157例应答被纳入分析。尽管75.0%的人表示在过去的12个月里要求进行测试,但只有49.0%的人表示他们已经为主流化做好了准备,47.7%的人表示他们已经返回了基因组测序结果,67.1%的人认为基因组测试是有用的。在测试申请表上使用人类表型本体术语(3.9/10)、解释基因组测试结果(4.8/10)、与患者和家属讨论复杂的基因组结果(4.3/10)以及将测试结果整合到患者护理中(4.7/10)等任务的平均置信度得分最低。在过去的12个月里,与那些没有要求检测的人相比,那些要求检测的人的平均基因组置信度要高得多(Z=5.063, p)。结论:我们的数据表明,目前儿科医生在基因组学方面缺乏准备和信心。来自临床遗传学服务、简化转诊表格和网络研讨会培训课程的支持可以改善目前的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mainstreaming genomics in the National Health Service in England: a survey to understand preparedness and confidence among paediatricians.

Background: The National Health Service in the UK is the first national healthcare system to offer genomic sequencing for rare disease diagnosis as routine care. Non-genetic medical specialists, including paediatricians, can now request genomic testing for certain clinical indications. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the preparedness and confidence of paediatricians providing genomic sequencing in England. In addition, we assessed current practice, perceived utility of testing, barriers and enablers, prior genomics education and training preferences.

Methods: A 26-item electronic survey for completion by paediatric specialists. Participants were recruited through national associations and a conference. Quantitative items were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Open-ended question responses were analysed by qualitative content analysis.

Results: 157 responses were included in the analysis. Only 49.0% reported feeling prepared for mainstreaming despite 75.0% reporting they had requested testing in the past 12 months, 47.7% indicating they had returned genomic sequencing results and 67.1% feeling genomic testing was useful. Mean confidence scores were lowest for tasks including using human phenotype ontology terminology on test request forms (3.9/10), interpreting genomic test results (4.8/10), discussing complex genomic results with patients and families (4.3/10) and integrating test results into patient care (4.7/10). Significantly higher average ranked genomic confidence was identified among those who had requested testing in the last 12 months compared with those who had not (Z=5.063, p<0.001, r=0.412). The most frequent barriers to mainstreaming were lack of training and knowledge (43.3%), determining patient eligibility (28.0%), lack of time (27.4%) and confidence (25.5%). Webinars (48.4%), followed by continued professional development meetings and/or conferences (38.9%), were the preferred mode of training.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that preparedness and confidence among paediatricians in genomics is currently lacking. Support from clinical genetics services, simplified referral forms and webinar training sessions could improve current practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信