Danielle Dawson, Gary Chan, Daniel Stjepanović, Valentina Lorenzetti, Wayne D. Hall, Janni Leung
{"title":"澳大利亚自我报告的药用、双重和娱乐目的大麻使用的流行程度及其相关因素:来自2022/2023年国家药物战略家庭调查的结果。","authors":"Danielle Dawson, Gary Chan, Daniel Stjepanović, Valentina Lorenzetti, Wayne D. Hall, Janni Leung","doi":"10.1111/dar.14062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Cannabis has been prescribed as a medicine in Australia since 2016. The current study aimed to conduct a descriptive, epidemiological investigation on the prevalence and correlates of cannabis use for different motives (recreational-only, medical-only or dual-use) in Australia. It also aimed to examine the correlates of different cannabis use motives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2022/2023 was used to estimate the prevalence and correlates of cannabis use motives among Australians. Prevalence estimates were weighted to the population and multinomial logistic regressions were used to examine the impact of age, gender, frequency of use and some of the most common conditions for which cannabis is prescribed in Australia (i.e., chronic pain, cancer and anxiety) on cannabis use motives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The prevalence of medical-only cannabis use was 1.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6, 1.4%), recreational-only use was 8.6% (CI 7.5, 9.7%) and dual-use was 1.9% (CI 1.3, 2.5%). Respondents who reported chronic pain had a stronger association with medical-only (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 8.10, <i>p</i> < 0.001) or dual-use motives (RRR = 5.17, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to recreational-only. Respondents who usually obtained cannabis via prescription had a stronger association with medical-only motives compared to dual-use (RRR = 10.55, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Greater frequency of use was more strongly associated with dual-use motives compared to recreational-only.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The emergence of dual-use cannabis consumers is a conundrum for the current medicinal cannabis policy framework in Australia. Research on the potential harms associated with the dual-use and medical-only use of cannabis should be prioritised as prescriptions for medicinal cannabis increase and barriers to access are lessened.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"44 5","pages":"1351-1364"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.14062","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prevalence and correlates of self-reported cannabis use for medicinal, dual and recreational motives in Australia: Findings from the National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2022/2023\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Dawson, Gary Chan, Daniel Stjepanović, Valentina Lorenzetti, Wayne D. Hall, Janni Leung\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dar.14062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cannabis has been prescribed as a medicine in Australia since 2016. The current study aimed to conduct a descriptive, epidemiological investigation on the prevalence and correlates of cannabis use for different motives (recreational-only, medical-only or dual-use) in Australia. It also aimed to examine the correlates of different cannabis use motives.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2022/2023 was used to estimate the prevalence and correlates of cannabis use motives among Australians. Prevalence estimates were weighted to the population and multinomial logistic regressions were used to examine the impact of age, gender, frequency of use and some of the most common conditions for which cannabis is prescribed in Australia (i.e., chronic pain, cancer and anxiety) on cannabis use motives.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The prevalence of medical-only cannabis use was 1.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6, 1.4%), recreational-only use was 8.6% (CI 7.5, 9.7%) and dual-use was 1.9% (CI 1.3, 2.5%). Respondents who reported chronic pain had a stronger association with medical-only (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 8.10, <i>p</i> < 0.001) or dual-use motives (RRR = 5.17, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to recreational-only. Respondents who usually obtained cannabis via prescription had a stronger association with medical-only motives compared to dual-use (RRR = 10.55, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Greater frequency of use was more strongly associated with dual-use motives compared to recreational-only.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The emergence of dual-use cannabis consumers is a conundrum for the current medicinal cannabis policy framework in Australia. Research on the potential harms associated with the dual-use and medical-only use of cannabis should be prioritised as prescriptions for medicinal cannabis increase and barriers to access are lessened.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"volume\":\"44 5\",\"pages\":\"1351-1364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.14062\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.14062\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.14062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The prevalence and correlates of self-reported cannabis use for medicinal, dual and recreational motives in Australia: Findings from the National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2022/2023
Introduction
Cannabis has been prescribed as a medicine in Australia since 2016. The current study aimed to conduct a descriptive, epidemiological investigation on the prevalence and correlates of cannabis use for different motives (recreational-only, medical-only or dual-use) in Australia. It also aimed to examine the correlates of different cannabis use motives.
Methods
The National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2022/2023 was used to estimate the prevalence and correlates of cannabis use motives among Australians. Prevalence estimates were weighted to the population and multinomial logistic regressions were used to examine the impact of age, gender, frequency of use and some of the most common conditions for which cannabis is prescribed in Australia (i.e., chronic pain, cancer and anxiety) on cannabis use motives.
Results
The prevalence of medical-only cannabis use was 1.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6, 1.4%), recreational-only use was 8.6% (CI 7.5, 9.7%) and dual-use was 1.9% (CI 1.3, 2.5%). Respondents who reported chronic pain had a stronger association with medical-only (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 8.10, p < 0.001) or dual-use motives (RRR = 5.17, p < 0.001) compared to recreational-only. Respondents who usually obtained cannabis via prescription had a stronger association with medical-only motives compared to dual-use (RRR = 10.55, p < 0.001). Greater frequency of use was more strongly associated with dual-use motives compared to recreational-only.
Discussion and Conclusions
The emergence of dual-use cannabis consumers is a conundrum for the current medicinal cannabis policy framework in Australia. Research on the potential harms associated with the dual-use and medical-only use of cannabis should be prioritised as prescriptions for medicinal cannabis increase and barriers to access are lessened.
期刊介绍:
Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.