Hannah Crepeault, Nicole Cowan, M. Eugenia Socias, Niloofar Riazi, Alison Knill, Avneet Khela, Evan Wood, Lianping Ti
{"title":"在加拿大社区戒断管理环境中应用改进版本的酒精戒断严重程度量表预测","authors":"Hannah Crepeault, Nicole Cowan, M. Eugenia Socias, Niloofar Riazi, Alison Knill, Avneet Khela, Evan Wood, Lianping Ti","doi":"10.1111/dar.14075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome (SAWS) can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. The Prediction of Alcohol Withdrawal Severity Scale (PAWSS) has been validated in general acute care environments, but its efficacy in withdrawal management settings remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess the utility of a modified PAWSS and identify appropriate cutoff scores in a community withdrawal management setting in Vancouver, Canada.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>From October 2019 to September 2022, we reviewed charts at Vancouver Detox Centre. Modified PAWSS versions replaced question 9 on the original PAWSS with: (i) breath analysis readings; (ii) alcohol consumption in the previous 24 h; and (iii) clinical assessments. We performed receiver operating characteristic analysis and used Youden's index to determine modified PAWSS' diagnostic accuracy against SAWS presentation, defined by a score of 15 or greater on the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment Alcohol, Revised, seizures or delirium tremens and/or benzodiazepine administration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 228 individuals (165 male, 63 female), 175 (75%) met SAWS criteria during admission. For breath analysis readings, an optimal PAWSS cutoff score had 55% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 46%–63%) and 74% specificity (95% CI 54%–87%). For alcohol consumption in the last 24 h, a cutoff score of 7 had 44% sensitivity (95% CI 36%–51%) and 85% specificity (95% CI 70%–93%). For clinical assessment, a cutoff score of 6 had 53% sensitivity (95% CI 45%–61%) and 71% specificity (95% CI 58%–85%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Within a community withdrawal setting, the prevalence of SAWS was high, rendering the modified PAWSS less valuable. Although higher cutoff scores improved specificity, poor sensitivity hindered identification of low-risk SAWS individuals.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"44 5","pages":"1365-1373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.14075","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying a Modified Version of the Prediction of Alcohol Withdrawal Severity Scale in a Canadian Community Withdrawal Management Setting\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Crepeault, Nicole Cowan, M. Eugenia Socias, Niloofar Riazi, Alison Knill, Avneet Khela, Evan Wood, Lianping Ti\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dar.14075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome (SAWS) can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. The Prediction of Alcohol Withdrawal Severity Scale (PAWSS) has been validated in general acute care environments, but its efficacy in withdrawal management settings remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess the utility of a modified PAWSS and identify appropriate cutoff scores in a community withdrawal management setting in Vancouver, Canada.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>From October 2019 to September 2022, we reviewed charts at Vancouver Detox Centre. Modified PAWSS versions replaced question 9 on the original PAWSS with: (i) breath analysis readings; (ii) alcohol consumption in the previous 24 h; and (iii) clinical assessments. We performed receiver operating characteristic analysis and used Youden's index to determine modified PAWSS' diagnostic accuracy against SAWS presentation, defined by a score of 15 or greater on the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment Alcohol, Revised, seizures or delirium tremens and/or benzodiazepine administration.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among 228 individuals (165 male, 63 female), 175 (75%) met SAWS criteria during admission. For breath analysis readings, an optimal PAWSS cutoff score had 55% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 46%–63%) and 74% specificity (95% CI 54%–87%). For alcohol consumption in the last 24 h, a cutoff score of 7 had 44% sensitivity (95% CI 36%–51%) and 85% specificity (95% CI 70%–93%). For clinical assessment, a cutoff score of 6 had 53% sensitivity (95% CI 45%–61%) and 71% specificity (95% CI 58%–85%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Within a community withdrawal setting, the prevalence of SAWS was high, rendering the modified PAWSS less valuable. Although higher cutoff scores improved specificity, poor sensitivity hindered identification of low-risk SAWS individuals.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"volume\":\"44 5\",\"pages\":\"1365-1373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.14075\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.14075\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.14075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
重度酒精戒断综合征(SAWS)可导致显著的发病率和死亡率。酒精戒断严重程度预测量表(PAWSS)已在一般急性护理环境中得到验证,但其在戒断管理环境中的有效性仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在评估改进后的PAWSS的效用,并在加拿大温哥华的社区取款管理设置中确定适当的截止分数。方法:回顾2019年10月至2022年9月温哥华排毒中心的病历。修改后的PAWSS版本将原PAWSS上的问题9替换为:(i)呼吸分析读数;(ii)过去24小时内的饮酒量;(三)临床评估。我们进行了受试者操作特征分析,并使用约登指数来确定改良PAWSS对SAWS表现的诊断准确性,SAWS的定义是临床研究所戒断评估酒精、修订、癫痫发作或震颤谵妄和/或苯二氮卓类药物的评分为15分或更高。结果:228例患者(男165例,女63例)中,175例(75%)在入院时符合SAWS标准。对于呼吸分析读数,最佳PAWSS截止评分具有55%的敏感性(95%置信区间[CI] 46%-63%)和74%的特异性(95% CI 54%-87%)。对于过去24小时内的酒精摄入,7分的临界值有44%的敏感性(95% CI 36%-51%)和85%的特异性(95% CI 70%-93%)。对于临床评估,6分的临界值有53%的敏感性(95% CI 45%-61%)和71%的特异性(95% CI 58%-85%)。讨论和结论:在社区戒断环境中,SAWS的患病率很高,使得改进的PAWSS的价值降低。虽然较高的临界值提高了特异性,但较差的敏感性阻碍了对低风险SAWS个体的识别。
Applying a Modified Version of the Prediction of Alcohol Withdrawal Severity Scale in a Canadian Community Withdrawal Management Setting
Introduction
Severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome (SAWS) can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. The Prediction of Alcohol Withdrawal Severity Scale (PAWSS) has been validated in general acute care environments, but its efficacy in withdrawal management settings remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess the utility of a modified PAWSS and identify appropriate cutoff scores in a community withdrawal management setting in Vancouver, Canada.
Methods
From October 2019 to September 2022, we reviewed charts at Vancouver Detox Centre. Modified PAWSS versions replaced question 9 on the original PAWSS with: (i) breath analysis readings; (ii) alcohol consumption in the previous 24 h; and (iii) clinical assessments. We performed receiver operating characteristic analysis and used Youden's index to determine modified PAWSS' diagnostic accuracy against SAWS presentation, defined by a score of 15 or greater on the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment Alcohol, Revised, seizures or delirium tremens and/or benzodiazepine administration.
Results
Among 228 individuals (165 male, 63 female), 175 (75%) met SAWS criteria during admission. For breath analysis readings, an optimal PAWSS cutoff score had 55% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 46%–63%) and 74% specificity (95% CI 54%–87%). For alcohol consumption in the last 24 h, a cutoff score of 7 had 44% sensitivity (95% CI 36%–51%) and 85% specificity (95% CI 70%–93%). For clinical assessment, a cutoff score of 6 had 53% sensitivity (95% CI 45%–61%) and 71% specificity (95% CI 58%–85%).
Discussion and Conclusions
Within a community withdrawal setting, the prevalence of SAWS was high, rendering the modified PAWSS less valuable. Although higher cutoff scores improved specificity, poor sensitivity hindered identification of low-risk SAWS individuals.
期刊介绍:
Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.