Chiara Cerami, Marina Boccardi, Claudia Meli, Andrea Panzavolta, Giulia Funghi, Cristina Festari, Stefano F Cappa, Thanos Chatzikostopoulos, Christian Chicherio, Florencia Clarens, Fabricio Ferreira de Oliveira, Francesco Di Lorenzo, Marco Filardi, Agustin Ibanez, Nicola Girtler, Thibaud Lebouvier, Giancarlo Logroscino, Antonella Luca, Sarah E MacPherson, Jordi A Matias-Guiu, Tommaso Piccoli, Olivier Piguet, Simone Pomati, Mirella Russo, Leonardo Sacco, Ann-Katrin Schild, Stefano L Sensi, Steven D Shirk, Marc Sollberger, Miguel Tábuas-Pereira, Magda Tsolaki, Esther van den Berg, Maxime Bertoux, Fiona Kumfor, Jan Van den Stock, Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer, Alessandra Dodich
{"title":"了解障碍和优化社会认知评估在神经认知障碍的诊断。","authors":"Chiara Cerami, Marina Boccardi, Claudia Meli, Andrea Panzavolta, Giulia Funghi, Cristina Festari, Stefano F Cappa, Thanos Chatzikostopoulos, Christian Chicherio, Florencia Clarens, Fabricio Ferreira de Oliveira, Francesco Di Lorenzo, Marco Filardi, Agustin Ibanez, Nicola Girtler, Thibaud Lebouvier, Giancarlo Logroscino, Antonella Luca, Sarah E MacPherson, Jordi A Matias-Guiu, Tommaso Piccoli, Olivier Piguet, Simone Pomati, Mirella Russo, Leonardo Sacco, Ann-Katrin Schild, Stefano L Sensi, Steven D Shirk, Marc Sollberger, Miguel Tábuas-Pereira, Magda Tsolaki, Esther van den Berg, Maxime Bertoux, Fiona Kumfor, Jan Van den Stock, Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer, Alessandra Dodich","doi":"10.1111/jnp.12431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Harmonized neuropsychological assessment for neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) is an urgent priority in clinics. Neuropsychology assessments in NCDs seldom include tests exploring social cognitive skills. In 2022, we launched the SIGNATURE initiative to optimize socio-cognitive assessment in NCDs. Here, we report findings from the first initiative phase, including consortium creation and evaluation of the state of the art in socio-cognitive assessment in memory clinics. We developed an ad hoc online survey to explore practices and measures, relevance, and obstacles preventing the use of socio-cognitive testing in clinics. The survey was distributed within the SIGNATURE network. National coordinators were identified to disseminate the survey to local collaborators and scientific societies active in the field of dementia and/or neuropsychology. Data were analysed in aggregate form and stratified by geographical area and variables of interest. Four hundred and thirteen (413) responses from 10 European and Latin American geographical regions were recorded. Responders were balanced between physicians and psychologists. Seventy-eight (78) % of respondents reported no/limited experience with socio-cognitive measures; more than 85% agreed on their relevance in clinics. Ekman-60 faces was the most well-known and/or used task, followed by the Faux-Pas and Reading-the-Mind-in-the-Eyes tests. Lack of clinical measures, assessment time, guidelines, and education/training were reported as main obstacles. Real-life barriers prevent the adoption of socio-cognitive testing in clinics. Bidirectional collaboration between clinicians and researchers is required to address clinical needs and constraints and facilitate consistent socio-cognitive assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding barriers and optimizing socio-cognitive assessment in the diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Chiara Cerami, Marina Boccardi, Claudia Meli, Andrea Panzavolta, Giulia Funghi, Cristina Festari, Stefano F Cappa, Thanos Chatzikostopoulos, Christian Chicherio, Florencia Clarens, Fabricio Ferreira de Oliveira, Francesco Di Lorenzo, Marco Filardi, Agustin Ibanez, Nicola Girtler, Thibaud Lebouvier, Giancarlo Logroscino, Antonella Luca, Sarah E MacPherson, Jordi A Matias-Guiu, Tommaso Piccoli, Olivier Piguet, Simone Pomati, Mirella Russo, Leonardo Sacco, Ann-Katrin Schild, Stefano L Sensi, Steven D Shirk, Marc Sollberger, Miguel Tábuas-Pereira, Magda Tsolaki, Esther van den Berg, Maxime Bertoux, Fiona Kumfor, Jan Van den Stock, Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer, Alessandra Dodich\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jnp.12431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Harmonized neuropsychological assessment for neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) is an urgent priority in clinics. Neuropsychology assessments in NCDs seldom include tests exploring social cognitive skills. In 2022, we launched the SIGNATURE initiative to optimize socio-cognitive assessment in NCDs. Here, we report findings from the first initiative phase, including consortium creation and evaluation of the state of the art in socio-cognitive assessment in memory clinics. We developed an ad hoc online survey to explore practices and measures, relevance, and obstacles preventing the use of socio-cognitive testing in clinics. The survey was distributed within the SIGNATURE network. National coordinators were identified to disseminate the survey to local collaborators and scientific societies active in the field of dementia and/or neuropsychology. Data were analysed in aggregate form and stratified by geographical area and variables of interest. Four hundred and thirteen (413) responses from 10 European and Latin American geographical regions were recorded. Responders were balanced between physicians and psychologists. Seventy-eight (78) % of respondents reported no/limited experience with socio-cognitive measures; more than 85% agreed on their relevance in clinics. Ekman-60 faces was the most well-known and/or used task, followed by the Faux-Pas and Reading-the-Mind-in-the-Eyes tests. Lack of clinical measures, assessment time, guidelines, and education/training were reported as main obstacles. Real-life barriers prevent the adoption of socio-cognitive testing in clinics. Bidirectional collaboration between clinicians and researchers is required to address clinical needs and constraints and facilitate consistent socio-cognitive assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12431\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12431","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding barriers and optimizing socio-cognitive assessment in the diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders.
Harmonized neuropsychological assessment for neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) is an urgent priority in clinics. Neuropsychology assessments in NCDs seldom include tests exploring social cognitive skills. In 2022, we launched the SIGNATURE initiative to optimize socio-cognitive assessment in NCDs. Here, we report findings from the first initiative phase, including consortium creation and evaluation of the state of the art in socio-cognitive assessment in memory clinics. We developed an ad hoc online survey to explore practices and measures, relevance, and obstacles preventing the use of socio-cognitive testing in clinics. The survey was distributed within the SIGNATURE network. National coordinators were identified to disseminate the survey to local collaborators and scientific societies active in the field of dementia and/or neuropsychology. Data were analysed in aggregate form and stratified by geographical area and variables of interest. Four hundred and thirteen (413) responses from 10 European and Latin American geographical regions were recorded. Responders were balanced between physicians and psychologists. Seventy-eight (78) % of respondents reported no/limited experience with socio-cognitive measures; more than 85% agreed on their relevance in clinics. Ekman-60 faces was the most well-known and/or used task, followed by the Faux-Pas and Reading-the-Mind-in-the-Eyes tests. Lack of clinical measures, assessment time, guidelines, and education/training were reported as main obstacles. Real-life barriers prevent the adoption of socio-cognitive testing in clinics. Bidirectional collaboration between clinicians and researchers is required to address clinical needs and constraints and facilitate consistent socio-cognitive assessment.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuropsychology publishes original contributions to scientific knowledge in neuropsychology including:
• clinical and research studies with neurological, psychiatric and psychological patient populations in all age groups
• behavioural or pharmacological treatment regimes
• cognitive experimentation and neuroimaging
• multidisciplinary approach embracing areas such as developmental psychology, neurology, psychiatry, physiology, endocrinology, pharmacology and imaging science
The following types of paper are invited:
• papers reporting original empirical investigations
• theoretical papers; provided that these are sufficiently related to empirical data
• review articles, which need not be exhaustive, but which should give an interpretation of the state of research in a given field and, where appropriate, identify its clinical implications
• brief reports and comments
• case reports
• fast-track papers (included in the issue following acceptation) reaction and rebuttals (short reactions to publications in JNP followed by an invited rebuttal of the original authors)
• special issues.