Fan Yang, Yang-Guang Jin, Shao-Zu Hu, He-Ying Yang, Xiao-Qing Zhu, Ming-Hui Duan, Ze-En Li, Yan Dai, Yue Liu, Shuai-Peng Li, Fang Yang
{"title":"不同干燥期荷斯坦奶牛灌喂伊维菌素后乳残留浓度的变化。","authors":"Fan Yang, Yang-Guang Jin, Shao-Zu Hu, He-Ying Yang, Xiao-Qing Zhu, Ming-Hui Duan, Ze-En Li, Yan Dai, Yue Liu, Shuai-Peng Li, Fang Yang","doi":"10.3168/jds.2025-26384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare ivermectin residue concentrations in milk following pour-on administration to Holstein cows at different stages of the dry period and to determine the necessary milk withdrawal period. Thirty dry cows were evenly divided into 3 groups based on estimated calving dates and received a single pour-on treatment of ivermectin at 0.5 mg/kg BW either 10, 20, or 30 d before these dates. Milk samples were collected 2 times daily for 7 consecutive days beginning on the second day after calving. The marker residue, 22,23-dihydroavermectin B1a, was measured using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem-MS/MS analysis, with the method showing strong correlation coefficients between 2.5 and 20 ng/mL. The limits of detection and quantification were 2 ng/mL and 2.5 ng/mL, respectively. The concentration-time data were analyzed using a noncompartmental model, and the milk withdrawal period was calculated with WTM 1.4 software. Results showed that when cows received ivermectin more than 10 d before calving, residue concentrations in milk were undetectable or present only in trace amounts, well below China's maximum residue limit (MRL) for ivermectin (10 ng/mL). In contrast, cows treated within 10 d before calving had a milk elimination half-life of 3.8 d for 22,23-dihydroavermectin B1a, with a peak concentration in milk of 13.75 ± 8.12 ng/mL at 1.70 ± 1.68 d postcalving. Based on China's MRL and the observed results, no milk withdrawal period is required if the interval between pour-on administration and calving exceeds 10 d. However, a 4-d withdrawal period after calving is recommended when the interval is shorter. In contrast, in countries without an established MRL, the presence of any detectable ivermectin residue (even below 10 ng/mL) would be a violation.</p>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Milk residue concentrations of ivermectin following pour-on administration to pregnant Holstein cows during different dry periods.\",\"authors\":\"Fan Yang, Yang-Guang Jin, Shao-Zu Hu, He-Ying Yang, Xiao-Qing Zhu, Ming-Hui Duan, Ze-En Li, Yan Dai, Yue Liu, Shuai-Peng Li, Fang Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.3168/jds.2025-26384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to compare ivermectin residue concentrations in milk following pour-on administration to Holstein cows at different stages of the dry period and to determine the necessary milk withdrawal period. Thirty dry cows were evenly divided into 3 groups based on estimated calving dates and received a single pour-on treatment of ivermectin at 0.5 mg/kg BW either 10, 20, or 30 d before these dates. Milk samples were collected 2 times daily for 7 consecutive days beginning on the second day after calving. The marker residue, 22,23-dihydroavermectin B1a, was measured using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem-MS/MS analysis, with the method showing strong correlation coefficients between 2.5 and 20 ng/mL. The limits of detection and quantification were 2 ng/mL and 2.5 ng/mL, respectively. The concentration-time data were analyzed using a noncompartmental model, and the milk withdrawal period was calculated with WTM 1.4 software. Results showed that when cows received ivermectin more than 10 d before calving, residue concentrations in milk were undetectable or present only in trace amounts, well below China's maximum residue limit (MRL) for ivermectin (10 ng/mL). In contrast, cows treated within 10 d before calving had a milk elimination half-life of 3.8 d for 22,23-dihydroavermectin B1a, with a peak concentration in milk of 13.75 ± 8.12 ng/mL at 1.70 ± 1.68 d postcalving. Based on China's MRL and the observed results, no milk withdrawal period is required if the interval between pour-on administration and calving exceeds 10 d. However, a 4-d withdrawal period after calving is recommended when the interval is shorter. In contrast, in countries without an established MRL, the presence of any detectable ivermectin residue (even below 10 ng/mL) would be a violation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dairy Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dairy Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-26384\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-26384","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Milk residue concentrations of ivermectin following pour-on administration to pregnant Holstein cows during different dry periods.
This study aimed to compare ivermectin residue concentrations in milk following pour-on administration to Holstein cows at different stages of the dry period and to determine the necessary milk withdrawal period. Thirty dry cows were evenly divided into 3 groups based on estimated calving dates and received a single pour-on treatment of ivermectin at 0.5 mg/kg BW either 10, 20, or 30 d before these dates. Milk samples were collected 2 times daily for 7 consecutive days beginning on the second day after calving. The marker residue, 22,23-dihydroavermectin B1a, was measured using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem-MS/MS analysis, with the method showing strong correlation coefficients between 2.5 and 20 ng/mL. The limits of detection and quantification were 2 ng/mL and 2.5 ng/mL, respectively. The concentration-time data were analyzed using a noncompartmental model, and the milk withdrawal period was calculated with WTM 1.4 software. Results showed that when cows received ivermectin more than 10 d before calving, residue concentrations in milk were undetectable or present only in trace amounts, well below China's maximum residue limit (MRL) for ivermectin (10 ng/mL). In contrast, cows treated within 10 d before calving had a milk elimination half-life of 3.8 d for 22,23-dihydroavermectin B1a, with a peak concentration in milk of 13.75 ± 8.12 ng/mL at 1.70 ± 1.68 d postcalving. Based on China's MRL and the observed results, no milk withdrawal period is required if the interval between pour-on administration and calving exceeds 10 d. However, a 4-d withdrawal period after calving is recommended when the interval is shorter. In contrast, in countries without an established MRL, the presence of any detectable ivermectin residue (even below 10 ng/mL) would be a violation.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.