自我定位:十多年后

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Family Process Pub Date : 2025-05-14 DOI:10.1111/famp.70038
thandiwe D. Watts-Jones, Cheryl Ching, Marissa Moore, Dorimar Morales, Rebecca Ross
{"title":"自我定位:十多年后","authors":"thandiwe D. Watts-Jones,&nbsp;Cheryl Ching,&nbsp;Marissa Moore,&nbsp;Dorimar Morales,&nbsp;Rebecca Ross","doi":"10.1111/famp.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article explores the use of location of self (LOS) in the years since the initial publication in 2010 and represents a collaboration of five family therapists. The initial part of the paper underscores LOS as both a clinical dialogic tool and conceptual framework, reviews the relevant literature during the time interval, and reflects on the core tenets of LOS, as well as emergent ideas, practices, and questions. The second part of the article presents the clinical work of four co-authors, illustrating their unique and creative use of LOS. Specifically, it discusses dialogue about the interplay of social locations in therapy, a form of use of self, a social location-self of the therapist awareness, and a conceptual frame for recognizing supremacy as an <i>in-here</i> phenomenon. That is, one embedded in social locations, which all people occupy, thus directing our attention to supremacy systems inside of us. LOS also underscores supremacy as a <i>clinical</i> issue, heightens attunement to the ways it can appear among the privileged and the subjugated, and increases attention to expanded ways of addressing it in therapy. We suggest that LOS dialogue tends to be most generative and easeful among therapists and clients who share multiple or similar subjugated locations, but it can also occur in the multi-privileged therapy relationship, depending on the awareness and comfort with such material. The reviewed literature suggests that LOS is used more often with multi-subjugated clients than those who are multi-privileged. We pose the question as to whether the power of the latter is a driving factor in this, given the challenges of addressing supremacy. We present the multiple perspectives within a single paper based on the unitary process of internal reviews and discussions of all co-author sections.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":"64 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Location of Self: More Than A Decade Later\",\"authors\":\"thandiwe D. Watts-Jones,&nbsp;Cheryl Ching,&nbsp;Marissa Moore,&nbsp;Dorimar Morales,&nbsp;Rebecca Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/famp.70038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This article explores the use of location of self (LOS) in the years since the initial publication in 2010 and represents a collaboration of five family therapists. The initial part of the paper underscores LOS as both a clinical dialogic tool and conceptual framework, reviews the relevant literature during the time interval, and reflects on the core tenets of LOS, as well as emergent ideas, practices, and questions. The second part of the article presents the clinical work of four co-authors, illustrating their unique and creative use of LOS. Specifically, it discusses dialogue about the interplay of social locations in therapy, a form of use of self, a social location-self of the therapist awareness, and a conceptual frame for recognizing supremacy as an <i>in-here</i> phenomenon. That is, one embedded in social locations, which all people occupy, thus directing our attention to supremacy systems inside of us. LOS also underscores supremacy as a <i>clinical</i> issue, heightens attunement to the ways it can appear among the privileged and the subjugated, and increases attention to expanded ways of addressing it in therapy. We suggest that LOS dialogue tends to be most generative and easeful among therapists and clients who share multiple or similar subjugated locations, but it can also occur in the multi-privileged therapy relationship, depending on the awareness and comfort with such material. The reviewed literature suggests that LOS is used more often with multi-subjugated clients than those who are multi-privileged. We pose the question as to whether the power of the latter is a driving factor in this, given the challenges of addressing supremacy. We present the multiple perspectives within a single paper based on the unitary process of internal reviews and discussions of all co-author sections.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Process\",\"volume\":\"64 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Process\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/famp.70038\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/famp.70038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了自2010年首次发表以来,自我定位(LOS)的使用情况,并代表了五位家庭治疗师的合作。本文的第一部分强调了LOS作为临床对话工具和概念框架,回顾了相关文献,并反思了LOS的核心原则,以及新兴的想法、实践和问题。文章的第二部分介绍了四位共同作者的临床工作,说明了他们独特和创造性地使用LOS。具体来说,它讨论了关于社会位置在治疗中的相互作用的对话,一种自我的使用形式,治疗师意识的社会位置自我,以及将霸权视为一种“在这里”现象的概念框架。也就是说,一个嵌入社会位置的人,所有人都占据着,从而把我们的注意力引向我们内心的至高无上的系统。LOS还强调了至高无上作为一个临床问题,加强了对它可能出现在特权和被征服者之间的方式的协调,并增加了对在治疗中解决它的扩展方法的关注。我们认为,在治疗师和来访者共享多个或类似的被征服地点之间,LOS对话往往是最具生理性和最轻松的,但它也可能发生在多重特权的治疗关系中,这取决于对这些材料的认识和舒适度。所回顾的文献表明,与具有多重特权的客户相比,LOS更常用于具有多重从属关系的客户。我们提出的问题是,鉴于解决霸权的挑战,后者的力量是否是其中的驱动因素。我们在一篇基于内部审查和所有共同作者部分讨论的统一过程的论文中提出了多个观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Location of Self: More Than A Decade Later

This article explores the use of location of self (LOS) in the years since the initial publication in 2010 and represents a collaboration of five family therapists. The initial part of the paper underscores LOS as both a clinical dialogic tool and conceptual framework, reviews the relevant literature during the time interval, and reflects on the core tenets of LOS, as well as emergent ideas, practices, and questions. The second part of the article presents the clinical work of four co-authors, illustrating their unique and creative use of LOS. Specifically, it discusses dialogue about the interplay of social locations in therapy, a form of use of self, a social location-self of the therapist awareness, and a conceptual frame for recognizing supremacy as an in-here phenomenon. That is, one embedded in social locations, which all people occupy, thus directing our attention to supremacy systems inside of us. LOS also underscores supremacy as a clinical issue, heightens attunement to the ways it can appear among the privileged and the subjugated, and increases attention to expanded ways of addressing it in therapy. We suggest that LOS dialogue tends to be most generative and easeful among therapists and clients who share multiple or similar subjugated locations, but it can also occur in the multi-privileged therapy relationship, depending on the awareness and comfort with such material. The reviewed literature suggests that LOS is used more often with multi-subjugated clients than those who are multi-privileged. We pose the question as to whether the power of the latter is a driving factor in this, given the challenges of addressing supremacy. We present the multiple perspectives within a single paper based on the unitary process of internal reviews and discussions of all co-author sections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family Process
Family Process Multiple-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信