中国不同气候带中型办公楼先进终端设备和热泵的能源性能及生命周期分析

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Shikang Wen, Bingyang Shen, Yuyue Yao, Qingyan Chen
{"title":"中国不同气候带中型办公楼先进终端设备和热泵的能源性能及生命周期分析","authors":"Shikang Wen,&nbsp;Bingyang Shen,&nbsp;Yuyue Yao,&nbsp;Qingyan Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China targets carbon neutrality by 2060, yet high emissions from buildings’ operational energy pose significant challenges. Radiant ceiling panel (RCP) and gravity cabinet unit (GCU) terminals as a part of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system, which rely on natural convection and radiation, have been proposed to reduce building energy consumption. However, limited research on their energy performance and economic feasibility across China’s diverse climates hinders widespread adoption. This study compared RCP and GCU terminals integrated with ground source heat pumps (GSHP) to traditional fan coil units (FCU) in a medium-sized office building across the five climate zones in China. To mitigate soil heat imbalance, a heating/cooling tower heat pump (HTHP) and a water-cooled chiller and boiler (WB) with the FCU were also applied. Energy simulations performed with EnergyPlus and life-cycle cost analyses evaluated energy consumption, payback periods, and net present values (NPV). Results showed RCP and GCU systems reduced energy consumption by 16–24 % and 8–11 %, respectively, compared to the FCU, primarily due to reduced fan energy use. Both GCU and RCP systems exhibited greater efficiency in colder climates, with the RCP achieving up to 23.8 % energy reduction in severe cold climate. The RCP had higher energy efficiency by employing low-lift heat pumps but incurred higher initial costs. The RCP’s NPV ranged from 70.5 to 288.2 CNY/m<sup>2</sup>, whereas GCU’s NPV ranged between 100 and 200 CNY/m<sup>2</sup> across analyzed climates. RCP systems achieved payback of 10–17 years, while GCU systems recovered costs in under 12 years. A sensitivity analysis of internal loads revealed that high occupancy density reduced energy savings for RCP systems by increasing the reliance on high-lift heat pumps. In hot summer and warm winter climate, the GSHP coupled FCU and GCU terminals outperformed the HTHP in efficiency but faced thermal imbalance challenges and higher costs, especially the FCU-GSHP with a 43-year payback. In severe cold climate, the RCP-GSHP achieved a 38.6 % energy reduction versus the FCU-WB, with reasonable payback periods of 9 years. The findings provide insights into selecting suitable HVAC systems for varied climates across China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"342 ","pages":"Article 115835"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy performance and life-cycle analyses of advanced terminal devices and heat pumps for a medium-sized office building in different climate zones in China\",\"authors\":\"Shikang Wen,&nbsp;Bingyang Shen,&nbsp;Yuyue Yao,&nbsp;Qingyan Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>China targets carbon neutrality by 2060, yet high emissions from buildings’ operational energy pose significant challenges. Radiant ceiling panel (RCP) and gravity cabinet unit (GCU) terminals as a part of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system, which rely on natural convection and radiation, have been proposed to reduce building energy consumption. However, limited research on their energy performance and economic feasibility across China’s diverse climates hinders widespread adoption. This study compared RCP and GCU terminals integrated with ground source heat pumps (GSHP) to traditional fan coil units (FCU) in a medium-sized office building across the five climate zones in China. To mitigate soil heat imbalance, a heating/cooling tower heat pump (HTHP) and a water-cooled chiller and boiler (WB) with the FCU were also applied. Energy simulations performed with EnergyPlus and life-cycle cost analyses evaluated energy consumption, payback periods, and net present values (NPV). Results showed RCP and GCU systems reduced energy consumption by 16–24 % and 8–11 %, respectively, compared to the FCU, primarily due to reduced fan energy use. Both GCU and RCP systems exhibited greater efficiency in colder climates, with the RCP achieving up to 23.8 % energy reduction in severe cold climate. The RCP had higher energy efficiency by employing low-lift heat pumps but incurred higher initial costs. The RCP’s NPV ranged from 70.5 to 288.2 CNY/m<sup>2</sup>, whereas GCU’s NPV ranged between 100 and 200 CNY/m<sup>2</sup> across analyzed climates. RCP systems achieved payback of 10–17 years, while GCU systems recovered costs in under 12 years. A sensitivity analysis of internal loads revealed that high occupancy density reduced energy savings for RCP systems by increasing the reliance on high-lift heat pumps. In hot summer and warm winter climate, the GSHP coupled FCU and GCU terminals outperformed the HTHP in efficiency but faced thermal imbalance challenges and higher costs, especially the FCU-GSHP with a 43-year payback. In severe cold climate, the RCP-GSHP achieved a 38.6 % energy reduction versus the FCU-WB, with reasonable payback periods of 9 years. The findings provide insights into selecting suitable HVAC systems for varied climates across China.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy and Buildings\",\"volume\":\"342 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115835\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy and Buildings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825005651\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825005651","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国的目标是到2060年实现碳中和,但建筑运营能源的高排放构成了重大挑战。辐射顶板(RCP)和重力柜单元(GCU)终端作为暖通空调(HVAC)系统的一部分,依靠自然对流和辐射来降低建筑能耗。然而,在中国不同气候条件下,对其能源性能和经济可行性的研究有限,阻碍了其广泛采用。本研究比较了中国5个气候带的中型办公大楼中集成地源热泵(GSHP)和传统风机盘管(FCU)的RCP和GCU终端。为了缓解土壤热不平衡,还采用了加热/冷却塔热泵(HTHP)和带FCU的水冷式冷水机组和锅炉(WB)。使用EnergyPlus进行的能源模拟和生命周期成本分析评估了能源消耗、投资回收期和净现值(NPV)。结果显示,与FCU相比,RCP和GCU系统分别减少了16 - 24%和8 - 11%的能耗,这主要是由于减少了风扇的能耗。GCU和RCP系统在较冷的气候条件下均表现出更高的效率,其中RCP在严寒气候条件下节能23.8%。通过采用低扬程热泵,RCP具有更高的能源效率,但产生了更高的初始成本。在分析的气候中,RCP的净现值在70.5至288.2元/平方米之间,而GCU的净现值在100至200元/平方米之间。RCP系统实现了10-17年的投资回报,而GCU系统在12年内收回了成本。对内部负荷的敏感性分析表明,高占用密度增加了对高扬程热泵的依赖,从而降低了RCP系统的能源节约。在夏季炎热和冬季温暖的气候条件下,GSHP耦合FCU和GCU终端的效率优于HTHP,但面临热平衡挑战和更高的成本,特别是FCU-GSHP具有43年的投资回收期。在严寒气候下,RCP-GSHP与FCU-WB相比节能38.6%,投资回收期为9年。研究结果为在中国不同气候条件下选择合适的暖通空调系统提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Energy performance and life-cycle analyses of advanced terminal devices and heat pumps for a medium-sized office building in different climate zones in China
China targets carbon neutrality by 2060, yet high emissions from buildings’ operational energy pose significant challenges. Radiant ceiling panel (RCP) and gravity cabinet unit (GCU) terminals as a part of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system, which rely on natural convection and radiation, have been proposed to reduce building energy consumption. However, limited research on their energy performance and economic feasibility across China’s diverse climates hinders widespread adoption. This study compared RCP and GCU terminals integrated with ground source heat pumps (GSHP) to traditional fan coil units (FCU) in a medium-sized office building across the five climate zones in China. To mitigate soil heat imbalance, a heating/cooling tower heat pump (HTHP) and a water-cooled chiller and boiler (WB) with the FCU were also applied. Energy simulations performed with EnergyPlus and life-cycle cost analyses evaluated energy consumption, payback periods, and net present values (NPV). Results showed RCP and GCU systems reduced energy consumption by 16–24 % and 8–11 %, respectively, compared to the FCU, primarily due to reduced fan energy use. Both GCU and RCP systems exhibited greater efficiency in colder climates, with the RCP achieving up to 23.8 % energy reduction in severe cold climate. The RCP had higher energy efficiency by employing low-lift heat pumps but incurred higher initial costs. The RCP’s NPV ranged from 70.5 to 288.2 CNY/m2, whereas GCU’s NPV ranged between 100 and 200 CNY/m2 across analyzed climates. RCP systems achieved payback of 10–17 years, while GCU systems recovered costs in under 12 years. A sensitivity analysis of internal loads revealed that high occupancy density reduced energy savings for RCP systems by increasing the reliance on high-lift heat pumps. In hot summer and warm winter climate, the GSHP coupled FCU and GCU terminals outperformed the HTHP in efficiency but faced thermal imbalance challenges and higher costs, especially the FCU-GSHP with a 43-year payback. In severe cold climate, the RCP-GSHP achieved a 38.6 % energy reduction versus the FCU-WB, with reasonable payback periods of 9 years. The findings provide insights into selecting suitable HVAC systems for varied climates across China.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信