Alessandro Tombari , Luciano Stefanini , Giovanni Li Destri Nicosia , Liam M.J. Holland , Marcus Dobbs
{"title":"岩土数据驱动的可能性可靠性评估","authors":"Alessandro Tombari , Luciano Stefanini , Giovanni Li Destri Nicosia , Liam M.J. Holland , Marcus Dobbs","doi":"10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Managing scarce, incomplete, or corrupted data is a persistent challenge in geotechnical engineering, often leading to conservative designs. However, the ongoing digitalization has enabled access to large, national-scale databases of indirect geotechnical data containing both qualitative and quantitative information, which can be exploited to support optioneering, site characterization, and design.</div><div>Based on a newly proposed concept of possibilistic data-driven reliability, this <em>Technical Note</em> outlines a practical, fast, and accessible implementation procedure that does not require specialized expertise. Step-by-step guidance is provided for reliability-based assessment and design of geotechnical problems, ensuring consistency with standard code safety prescriptions.</div><div>The procedure demonstrates how to utilize possibility distributions generated from Big Indirect Databases managed by third-party administrators, such as the British Geological Survey, to derive design input values for deterministic evaluations of geotechnical capacity or limit state domains. Engineering judgement is rigorously incorporated through a three-tier ‘degree of understanding’ framework worked example of an axially-loaded pile in bilayer soil, characterized using cone penetration test data, is also provided.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55217,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Geotechnics","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 107311"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geotechnical data-driven possibility reliability assessment\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Tombari , Luciano Stefanini , Giovanni Li Destri Nicosia , Liam M.J. Holland , Marcus Dobbs\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Managing scarce, incomplete, or corrupted data is a persistent challenge in geotechnical engineering, often leading to conservative designs. However, the ongoing digitalization has enabled access to large, national-scale databases of indirect geotechnical data containing both qualitative and quantitative information, which can be exploited to support optioneering, site characterization, and design.</div><div>Based on a newly proposed concept of possibilistic data-driven reliability, this <em>Technical Note</em> outlines a practical, fast, and accessible implementation procedure that does not require specialized expertise. Step-by-step guidance is provided for reliability-based assessment and design of geotechnical problems, ensuring consistency with standard code safety prescriptions.</div><div>The procedure demonstrates how to utilize possibility distributions generated from Big Indirect Databases managed by third-party administrators, such as the British Geological Survey, to derive design input values for deterministic evaluations of geotechnical capacity or limit state domains. Engineering judgement is rigorously incorporated through a three-tier ‘degree of understanding’ framework worked example of an axially-loaded pile in bilayer soil, characterized using cone penetration test data, is also provided.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Geotechnics\",\"volume\":\"185 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Geotechnics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266352X25002605\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266352X25002605","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Managing scarce, incomplete, or corrupted data is a persistent challenge in geotechnical engineering, often leading to conservative designs. However, the ongoing digitalization has enabled access to large, national-scale databases of indirect geotechnical data containing both qualitative and quantitative information, which can be exploited to support optioneering, site characterization, and design.
Based on a newly proposed concept of possibilistic data-driven reliability, this Technical Note outlines a practical, fast, and accessible implementation procedure that does not require specialized expertise. Step-by-step guidance is provided for reliability-based assessment and design of geotechnical problems, ensuring consistency with standard code safety prescriptions.
The procedure demonstrates how to utilize possibility distributions generated from Big Indirect Databases managed by third-party administrators, such as the British Geological Survey, to derive design input values for deterministic evaluations of geotechnical capacity or limit state domains. Engineering judgement is rigorously incorporated through a three-tier ‘degree of understanding’ framework worked example of an axially-loaded pile in bilayer soil, characterized using cone penetration test data, is also provided.
期刊介绍:
The use of computers is firmly established in geotechnical engineering and continues to grow rapidly in both engineering practice and academe. The development of advanced numerical techniques and constitutive modeling, in conjunction with rapid developments in computer hardware, enables problems to be tackled that were unthinkable even a few years ago. Computers and Geotechnics provides an up-to-date reference for engineers and researchers engaged in computer aided analysis and research in geotechnical engineering. The journal is intended for an expeditious dissemination of advanced computer applications across a broad range of geotechnical topics. Contributions on advances in numerical algorithms, computer implementation of new constitutive models and probabilistic methods are especially encouraged.