转基因甜菜KWS20-1的评价(申请号GMFF-2023-14732)

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), Josep Casacuberta, Francisco Barro, Albert Braeuning, Ruud de Maagd, Michelle M. Epstein, Thomas Frenzel, Jean-Luc Gallois, Frits Koning, Antoine Messéan, F. Javier Moreno, Fabien Nogué, Giovanni Savoini, Alan H. Schulman, Christoph Tebbe, Eve Veromann, Michele Ardizzone, Giacomo De Sanctis, Antonio Fernandez Dumont, Arianna Ferrari, Andrea Gennaro, José Ángel Gómez Ruiz, Tilemachos Goumperis, Dafni Maria Kagkli, Aleksandra Lewandowska, Ana M. Camargo, Maria Neri Franco, Pietro Piffanelli, Tommaso Raffaello, Marta Rodrigues, Elena Sánchez-Brunete
{"title":"转基因甜菜KWS20-1的评价(申请号GMFF-2023-14732)","authors":"EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO),&nbsp;Josep Casacuberta,&nbsp;Francisco Barro,&nbsp;Albert Braeuning,&nbsp;Ruud de Maagd,&nbsp;Michelle M. Epstein,&nbsp;Thomas Frenzel,&nbsp;Jean-Luc Gallois,&nbsp;Frits Koning,&nbsp;Antoine Messéan,&nbsp;F. Javier Moreno,&nbsp;Fabien Nogué,&nbsp;Giovanni Savoini,&nbsp;Alan H. Schulman,&nbsp;Christoph Tebbe,&nbsp;Eve Veromann,&nbsp;Michele Ardizzone,&nbsp;Giacomo De Sanctis,&nbsp;Antonio Fernandez Dumont,&nbsp;Arianna Ferrari,&nbsp;Andrea Gennaro,&nbsp;José Ángel Gómez Ruiz,&nbsp;Tilemachos Goumperis,&nbsp;Dafni Maria Kagkli,&nbsp;Aleksandra Lewandowska,&nbsp;Ana M. Camargo,&nbsp;Maria Neri Franco,&nbsp;Pietro Piffanelli,&nbsp;Tommaso Raffaello,&nbsp;Marta Rodrigues,&nbsp;Elena Sánchez-Brunete","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Genetically modified sugar beet KWS20-1 was developed to confer tolerance to glyphosate-, dicamba- and glufosinate-ammonium-based herbicides. These properties were achieved by introducing the <i>cp4 epsps</i>, <i>dmo</i> and <i>pat</i> expression cassettes. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring further safety assessment. None of the identified differences in the agronomic/phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between sugar beet KWS20-1 and its conventional counterpart need further assessment, except for pectin in roots, which underwent additional evaluation and was found not to raise any safety or nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the potential toxicity and allergenicity of the CP4 EPSPS, DMO and PAT proteins as expressed in sugar beet KWS20-1, and finds no evidence that the genetic modification would change the overall safety of sugar beet KWS20-1 as food and feed. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from sugar beet KWS20-1 does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that sugar beet KWS20-1 is as safe as the conventional counterpart and non-GM sugar beet reference varieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. The scope of the application does not include cultivation and import of viable materials in the EU and the products would be expected to only contain residual amounts of DNA and protein. The environmental risk assessment was limited to the possible plant-to-bacteria horizontal gene transfer and the evaluation of potential interactions of KWS20-1 sugar beet products with biogeochemical cycles, and neither of them indicates a safety concern. The GMO Panel concludes that the sugar beet KWS20-1 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non-GM reference sugar beet varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9381","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of genetically modified sugar beet KWS20-1 (application GMFF-2023-14732)\",\"authors\":\"EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO),&nbsp;Josep Casacuberta,&nbsp;Francisco Barro,&nbsp;Albert Braeuning,&nbsp;Ruud de Maagd,&nbsp;Michelle M. Epstein,&nbsp;Thomas Frenzel,&nbsp;Jean-Luc Gallois,&nbsp;Frits Koning,&nbsp;Antoine Messéan,&nbsp;F. Javier Moreno,&nbsp;Fabien Nogué,&nbsp;Giovanni Savoini,&nbsp;Alan H. Schulman,&nbsp;Christoph Tebbe,&nbsp;Eve Veromann,&nbsp;Michele Ardizzone,&nbsp;Giacomo De Sanctis,&nbsp;Antonio Fernandez Dumont,&nbsp;Arianna Ferrari,&nbsp;Andrea Gennaro,&nbsp;José Ángel Gómez Ruiz,&nbsp;Tilemachos Goumperis,&nbsp;Dafni Maria Kagkli,&nbsp;Aleksandra Lewandowska,&nbsp;Ana M. Camargo,&nbsp;Maria Neri Franco,&nbsp;Pietro Piffanelli,&nbsp;Tommaso Raffaello,&nbsp;Marta Rodrigues,&nbsp;Elena Sánchez-Brunete\",\"doi\":\"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Genetically modified sugar beet KWS20-1 was developed to confer tolerance to glyphosate-, dicamba- and glufosinate-ammonium-based herbicides. These properties were achieved by introducing the <i>cp4 epsps</i>, <i>dmo</i> and <i>pat</i> expression cassettes. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring further safety assessment. None of the identified differences in the agronomic/phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between sugar beet KWS20-1 and its conventional counterpart need further assessment, except for pectin in roots, which underwent additional evaluation and was found not to raise any safety or nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the potential toxicity and allergenicity of the CP4 EPSPS, DMO and PAT proteins as expressed in sugar beet KWS20-1, and finds no evidence that the genetic modification would change the overall safety of sugar beet KWS20-1 as food and feed. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from sugar beet KWS20-1 does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that sugar beet KWS20-1 is as safe as the conventional counterpart and non-GM sugar beet reference varieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. The scope of the application does not include cultivation and import of viable materials in the EU and the products would be expected to only contain residual amounts of DNA and protein. The environmental risk assessment was limited to the possible plant-to-bacteria horizontal gene transfer and the evaluation of potential interactions of KWS20-1 sugar beet products with biogeochemical cycles, and neither of them indicates a safety concern. The GMO Panel concludes that the sugar beet KWS20-1 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non-GM reference sugar beet varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9381\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9381\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9381","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

转基因甜菜KWS20-1对草甘膦、麦草畏和草铵类除草剂具有耐受性。这些特性是通过引入cp4 epsps, dmo和pat表达磁带来实现的。分子特征数据和生物信息学分析没有发现需要进一步安全性评估的问题。KWS20-1甜菜与普通甜菜在农艺/表型和组成特征方面的差异均无需进一步评估,但根中的果胶进行了额外评估,未发现任何安全性或营养问题。转基因专家小组没有发现甜菜KWS20-1中表达的CP4 EPSPS、DMO和PAT蛋白的潜在毒性和致敏性方面的安全问题,也没有发现证据表明转基因会改变甜菜KWS20-1作为食品和饲料的总体安全性。在本应用的背景下,食用来自甜菜KWS20-1的食物和饲料并不代表人类和动物的营养问题。转基因小组的结论是,KWS20-1甜菜与经测试的传统对应物和非转基因甜菜参考品种一样安全,并且认为没有必要对食品/饲料进行上市后监测。申请的范围不包括在欧盟种植和进口可行材料,产品预计只含有残留的DNA和蛋白质。环境风险评价仅局限于KWS20-1甜菜产品可能的植物-细菌水平基因转移和与生物地球化学循环的潜在相互作用评价,均不存在安全问题。转基因生物小组的结论是,就对人类和动物健康以及环境的潜在影响而言,KWS20-1甜菜与传统甜菜和经测试的非转基因参考甜菜品种一样安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of genetically modified sugar beet KWS20-1 (application GMFF-2023-14732)

Genetically modified sugar beet KWS20-1 was developed to confer tolerance to glyphosate-, dicamba- and glufosinate-ammonium-based herbicides. These properties were achieved by introducing the cp4 epsps, dmo and pat expression cassettes. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring further safety assessment. None of the identified differences in the agronomic/phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between sugar beet KWS20-1 and its conventional counterpart need further assessment, except for pectin in roots, which underwent additional evaluation and was found not to raise any safety or nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the potential toxicity and allergenicity of the CP4 EPSPS, DMO and PAT proteins as expressed in sugar beet KWS20-1, and finds no evidence that the genetic modification would change the overall safety of sugar beet KWS20-1 as food and feed. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from sugar beet KWS20-1 does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that sugar beet KWS20-1 is as safe as the conventional counterpart and non-GM sugar beet reference varieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. The scope of the application does not include cultivation and import of viable materials in the EU and the products would be expected to only contain residual amounts of DNA and protein. The environmental risk assessment was limited to the possible plant-to-bacteria horizontal gene transfer and the evaluation of potential interactions of KWS20-1 sugar beet products with biogeochemical cycles, and neither of them indicates a safety concern. The GMO Panel concludes that the sugar beet KWS20-1 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non-GM reference sugar beet varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信