Flávia V. Mello , Pedro Silva , Marisa Barata , Florbela Soares , Pedro Pousão-Ferreira , Maria Paula Duarte , Luísa M.P. Valente , António Marques , Patrícia Anacleto
{"title":"光斑Sparus aurata水产饲料蛋白质消化率:鱼类体外生物可及性验证模型","authors":"Flávia V. Mello , Pedro Silva , Marisa Barata , Florbela Soares , Pedro Pousão-Ferreira , Maria Paula Duarte , Luísa M.P. Valente , António Marques , Patrícia Anacleto","doi":"10.1016/j.foodres.2025.116554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The <em>in vitro</em> assessment of nutrient digestibility in aquaculture offers a fast, affordable, and ethical alternative enabling to optimize the nutritional value of feeds for improved fish health. Although commonly used in human studies, these <em>in vitro</em> models are still scarce for fish. This study aimed to validate an <em>in vitro</em> digestion method for marine fish using both fish crude digestive extracts and commercial digestive enzymes through a comparison with an <em>in vivo</em> assay using gilthead seabream (<em>Sparus aurata</em>) as a biological model. Additionally, the effects of temperature, digestion time and feed amount (enzyme-to-substrate [E:S] ratio) influenced the <em>in vitro</em> protein digestibility, either individually or through their interactions. Only commercial enzymes lead to similar protein bioaccessibilities to those obtained <em>in vivo</em> (90.8 ± 1.7 %) under the following factorial design: i) 20 °C, 24 h, 250 mg of feed (88.1 ± 2.6 %); ii) 37 °C, 6 h, 136.5, 250 and 500 mg (85.9 ± 2.5 %, 90.1 ± 3.0 % and 87.4 ± 1.0 %, respectively); and iii) 37 °C, 24 h, 500 and 1000 mg (86.0 ± 2.1 %, 86.6 ± 5.2 %, respectively). The distinct action mechanisms of non-fish commercial enzymes seem to significantly enhance protein bioaccessibility compared to fish digestive extracts. Moreover, an optimal balance between temperature and digestion time plays a crucial role in maximizing digestibility, supporting efficient nutrient breakdown and absorption. The validated <em>in vitro</em> digestibility method using commercial enzymes for <em>S. aurata</em> provides a cost-effective, fast alternative and free of ethical constraints. We also propose a standardized E:S ratio to be applied in future studies using this methodology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":323,"journal":{"name":"Food Research International","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 116554"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protein digestibility of aquafeeds in Sparus aurata: A model for in vitro bioaccessibility validation in fish\",\"authors\":\"Flávia V. Mello , Pedro Silva , Marisa Barata , Florbela Soares , Pedro Pousão-Ferreira , Maria Paula Duarte , Luísa M.P. Valente , António Marques , Patrícia Anacleto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodres.2025.116554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The <em>in vitro</em> assessment of nutrient digestibility in aquaculture offers a fast, affordable, and ethical alternative enabling to optimize the nutritional value of feeds for improved fish health. Although commonly used in human studies, these <em>in vitro</em> models are still scarce for fish. This study aimed to validate an <em>in vitro</em> digestion method for marine fish using both fish crude digestive extracts and commercial digestive enzymes through a comparison with an <em>in vivo</em> assay using gilthead seabream (<em>Sparus aurata</em>) as a biological model. Additionally, the effects of temperature, digestion time and feed amount (enzyme-to-substrate [E:S] ratio) influenced the <em>in vitro</em> protein digestibility, either individually or through their interactions. Only commercial enzymes lead to similar protein bioaccessibilities to those obtained <em>in vivo</em> (90.8 ± 1.7 %) under the following factorial design: i) 20 °C, 24 h, 250 mg of feed (88.1 ± 2.6 %); ii) 37 °C, 6 h, 136.5, 250 and 500 mg (85.9 ± 2.5 %, 90.1 ± 3.0 % and 87.4 ± 1.0 %, respectively); and iii) 37 °C, 24 h, 500 and 1000 mg (86.0 ± 2.1 %, 86.6 ± 5.2 %, respectively). The distinct action mechanisms of non-fish commercial enzymes seem to significantly enhance protein bioaccessibility compared to fish digestive extracts. Moreover, an optimal balance between temperature and digestion time plays a crucial role in maximizing digestibility, supporting efficient nutrient breakdown and absorption. The validated <em>in vitro</em> digestibility method using commercial enzymes for <em>S. aurata</em> provides a cost-effective, fast alternative and free of ethical constraints. We also propose a standardized E:S ratio to be applied in future studies using this methodology.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Research International\",\"volume\":\"213 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963996925008920\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Research International","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963996925008920","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Protein digestibility of aquafeeds in Sparus aurata: A model for in vitro bioaccessibility validation in fish
The in vitro assessment of nutrient digestibility in aquaculture offers a fast, affordable, and ethical alternative enabling to optimize the nutritional value of feeds for improved fish health. Although commonly used in human studies, these in vitro models are still scarce for fish. This study aimed to validate an in vitro digestion method for marine fish using both fish crude digestive extracts and commercial digestive enzymes through a comparison with an in vivo assay using gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) as a biological model. Additionally, the effects of temperature, digestion time and feed amount (enzyme-to-substrate [E:S] ratio) influenced the in vitro protein digestibility, either individually or through their interactions. Only commercial enzymes lead to similar protein bioaccessibilities to those obtained in vivo (90.8 ± 1.7 %) under the following factorial design: i) 20 °C, 24 h, 250 mg of feed (88.1 ± 2.6 %); ii) 37 °C, 6 h, 136.5, 250 and 500 mg (85.9 ± 2.5 %, 90.1 ± 3.0 % and 87.4 ± 1.0 %, respectively); and iii) 37 °C, 24 h, 500 and 1000 mg (86.0 ± 2.1 %, 86.6 ± 5.2 %, respectively). The distinct action mechanisms of non-fish commercial enzymes seem to significantly enhance protein bioaccessibility compared to fish digestive extracts. Moreover, an optimal balance between temperature and digestion time plays a crucial role in maximizing digestibility, supporting efficient nutrient breakdown and absorption. The validated in vitro digestibility method using commercial enzymes for S. aurata provides a cost-effective, fast alternative and free of ethical constraints. We also propose a standardized E:S ratio to be applied in future studies using this methodology.
期刊介绍:
Food Research International serves as a rapid dissemination platform for significant and impactful research in food science, technology, engineering, and nutrition. The journal focuses on publishing novel, high-quality, and high-impact review papers, original research papers, and letters to the editors across various disciplines in the science and technology of food. Additionally, it follows a policy of publishing special issues on topical and emergent subjects in food research or related areas. Selected, peer-reviewed papers from scientific meetings, workshops, and conferences on the science, technology, and engineering of foods are also featured in special issues.