Sixuan Chen , Yongmei Liu , Jianxin Wang , Daniel Houser
{"title":"诚实与领导能力","authors":"Sixuan Chen , Yongmei Liu , Jianxin Wang , Daniel Houser","doi":"10.1016/j.leaqua.2024.101860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We study the impact of honesty on electoral outcomes and effective leadership. We predict that dishonest candidates are more likely to win elections, and yet be less likely to lead effectively. Consequently, groups who elect honest leaders are more likely to achieve socially efficient outcomes. We use laboratory experiments to test these predictions. We find that cheating rates are high among leaders when cheating is possible. Further, we obtain causal evidence that, in relation to dishonest leaders, honest followers are more likely to obey honest leaders, resulting in improved cooperation, higher social efficiency and greater equity among group members.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48434,"journal":{"name":"Leadership Quarterly","volume":"36 3","pages":"Article 101860"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Honesty and leadership\",\"authors\":\"Sixuan Chen , Yongmei Liu , Jianxin Wang , Daniel Houser\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.leaqua.2024.101860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We study the impact of honesty on electoral outcomes and effective leadership. We predict that dishonest candidates are more likely to win elections, and yet be less likely to lead effectively. Consequently, groups who elect honest leaders are more likely to achieve socially efficient outcomes. We use laboratory experiments to test these predictions. We find that cheating rates are high among leaders when cheating is possible. Further, we obtain causal evidence that, in relation to dishonest leaders, honest followers are more likely to obey honest leaders, resulting in improved cooperation, higher social efficiency and greater equity among group members.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leadership Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101860\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leadership Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984324000894\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984324000894","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
We study the impact of honesty on electoral outcomes and effective leadership. We predict that dishonest candidates are more likely to win elections, and yet be less likely to lead effectively. Consequently, groups who elect honest leaders are more likely to achieve socially efficient outcomes. We use laboratory experiments to test these predictions. We find that cheating rates are high among leaders when cheating is possible. Further, we obtain causal evidence that, in relation to dishonest leaders, honest followers are more likely to obey honest leaders, resulting in improved cooperation, higher social efficiency and greater equity among group members.
期刊介绍:
The Leadership Quarterly is a social-science journal dedicated to advancing our understanding of leadership as a phenomenon, how to study it, as well as its practical implications.
Leadership Quarterly seeks contributions from various disciplinary perspectives, including psychology broadly defined (i.e., industrial-organizational, social, evolutionary, biological, differential), management (i.e., organizational behavior, strategy, organizational theory), political science, sociology, economics (i.e., personnel, behavioral, labor), anthropology, history, and methodology.Equally desirable are contributions from multidisciplinary perspectives.