同时和同步运动皮层θ波爆发刺激及上肢神经肌肉电刺激的剂量持续效应

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Na Cao , Atsushi Sasaki , Milos R. Popovic , Kimitaka Nakazawa , Matija Milosevic
{"title":"同时和同步运动皮层θ波爆发刺激及上肢神经肌肉电刺激的剂量持续效应","authors":"Na Cao ,&nbsp;Atsushi Sasaki ,&nbsp;Milos R. Popovic ,&nbsp;Kimitaka Nakazawa ,&nbsp;Matija Milosevic","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.04.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can induce rapid cortical facilitation, while neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can activate sensorimotor networks to excite the central nervous system. Application of iTBS and NMES delivered concurrently at a synchronized 50 Hz frequency was recently shown to elicit greater but transient corticospinal facilitation compared to each intervention. Our current study aimed to investigate the dose-duration neuromodulation effects of concurrent and synchronized associative stimulation using iTBS-NMES. A single dose consisted of 600 pulses of iTBS applied simultaneously with 50 Hz NMES for 2 s ON/8s OFF over 192 s. Four interventions were tested on separate days in eleven able-bodied individuals: iTBS600-NMES (one dose), iTBS1200-NMES (two doses), iTBS1800-NMES (three doses), and iTBS1800 (control intervention consisting of three iTBS-alone doses without NMES). Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of motor cortex was used to evaluate corticospinal excitability through motor evoked potentials (MEP). Paired-pulse TMS short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) was used to evaluate intracortical inhibition, and maximum motor responses (M<sub>max</sub>) were elicited by radial nerve stimulation to monitor fatigue. Assessments were completed before, immediately after, and every 10 min for total 30 min after each intervention. Our results showed significant MEP facilitation for at least 30 min only after iTBS1800-NMES intervention, while the iTBS1800 control intervention was ineffective. SICI and M<sub>max</sub> responses were not affected by any intervention. Our findings demonstrate that increased iTBS-NMES dose-duration extends corticospinal facilitation that likely involved the cumulative effect to overcome the homeostatic threshold with repetitive synchronized activation of cortical and peripheral inputs at the subcortical level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19142,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience","volume":"576 ","pages":"Pages 253-262"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose duration effect of concurrent and synchronized motor cortex theta burst stimulation and upper-limb neuromuscular electrical stimulation\",\"authors\":\"Na Cao ,&nbsp;Atsushi Sasaki ,&nbsp;Milos R. Popovic ,&nbsp;Kimitaka Nakazawa ,&nbsp;Matija Milosevic\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.04.047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can induce rapid cortical facilitation, while neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can activate sensorimotor networks to excite the central nervous system. Application of iTBS and NMES delivered concurrently at a synchronized 50 Hz frequency was recently shown to elicit greater but transient corticospinal facilitation compared to each intervention. Our current study aimed to investigate the dose-duration neuromodulation effects of concurrent and synchronized associative stimulation using iTBS-NMES. A single dose consisted of 600 pulses of iTBS applied simultaneously with 50 Hz NMES for 2 s ON/8s OFF over 192 s. Four interventions were tested on separate days in eleven able-bodied individuals: iTBS600-NMES (one dose), iTBS1200-NMES (two doses), iTBS1800-NMES (three doses), and iTBS1800 (control intervention consisting of three iTBS-alone doses without NMES). Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of motor cortex was used to evaluate corticospinal excitability through motor evoked potentials (MEP). Paired-pulse TMS short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) was used to evaluate intracortical inhibition, and maximum motor responses (M<sub>max</sub>) were elicited by radial nerve stimulation to monitor fatigue. Assessments were completed before, immediately after, and every 10 min for total 30 min after each intervention. Our results showed significant MEP facilitation for at least 30 min only after iTBS1800-NMES intervention, while the iTBS1800 control intervention was ineffective. SICI and M<sub>max</sub> responses were not affected by any intervention. Our findings demonstrate that increased iTBS-NMES dose-duration extends corticospinal facilitation that likely involved the cumulative effect to overcome the homeostatic threshold with repetitive synchronized activation of cortical and peripheral inputs at the subcortical level.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"576 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 253-262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452225003409\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452225003409","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

间歇性θ波爆发刺激(iTBS)可诱导皮层快速易化,而神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)可激活感觉运动网络,使中枢神经系统兴奋。最近的研究表明,与每一种干预相比,iTBS和NMES同时以同步的50 Hz频率进行治疗可引起更大但短暂的皮质脊髓促进。我们目前的研究旨在研究iTBS-NMES并发和同步联合刺激的剂量-持续时间神经调节效应。单次剂量包括600次iTBS脉冲与50 Hz NMES同时施加,在192秒内开2秒/关8秒。在11名身体健全的个体中,分别在不同的天测试了四种干预措施:iTBS600-NMES(一剂)、iTBS1200-NMES(两剂)、iTBS1800-NMES(三剂)和iTBS1800(对照干预,包括三个itbs单独剂量,不含NMES)。采用单脉冲经颅磁刺激(TMS),通过运动诱发电位(MEP)评价运动皮质脊髓兴奋性。采用配对脉冲TMS短间隔皮质内抑制(SICI)评价皮质内抑制,采用桡神经刺激诱导最大运动反应(Mmax)监测疲劳。评估分别在每次干预前、干预后和每10分钟完成一次,每次干预后共30分钟。我们的研究结果显示,只有在iTBS1800- nmes干预后,才有至少30分钟的MEP促进作用,而iTBS1800对照干预无效。SICI和Mmax反应不受任何干预的影响。我们的研究结果表明,iTBS-NMES剂量持续时间的增加延长了皮质脊髓的促进作用,这可能涉及通过皮层和外周输入在皮层下水平重复同步激活来克服稳态阈值的累积效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dose duration effect of concurrent and synchronized motor cortex theta burst stimulation and upper-limb neuromuscular electrical stimulation
Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can induce rapid cortical facilitation, while neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can activate sensorimotor networks to excite the central nervous system. Application of iTBS and NMES delivered concurrently at a synchronized 50 Hz frequency was recently shown to elicit greater but transient corticospinal facilitation compared to each intervention. Our current study aimed to investigate the dose-duration neuromodulation effects of concurrent and synchronized associative stimulation using iTBS-NMES. A single dose consisted of 600 pulses of iTBS applied simultaneously with 50 Hz NMES for 2 s ON/8s OFF over 192 s. Four interventions were tested on separate days in eleven able-bodied individuals: iTBS600-NMES (one dose), iTBS1200-NMES (two doses), iTBS1800-NMES (three doses), and iTBS1800 (control intervention consisting of three iTBS-alone doses without NMES). Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of motor cortex was used to evaluate corticospinal excitability through motor evoked potentials (MEP). Paired-pulse TMS short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) was used to evaluate intracortical inhibition, and maximum motor responses (Mmax) were elicited by radial nerve stimulation to monitor fatigue. Assessments were completed before, immediately after, and every 10 min for total 30 min after each intervention. Our results showed significant MEP facilitation for at least 30 min only after iTBS1800-NMES intervention, while the iTBS1800 control intervention was ineffective. SICI and Mmax responses were not affected by any intervention. Our findings demonstrate that increased iTBS-NMES dose-duration extends corticospinal facilitation that likely involved the cumulative effect to overcome the homeostatic threshold with repetitive synchronized activation of cortical and peripheral inputs at the subcortical level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience
Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
394
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Neuroscience publishes papers describing the results of original research on any aspect of the scientific study of the nervous system. Any paper, however short, will be considered for publication provided that it reports significant, new and carefully confirmed findings with full experimental details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信