富含燕麦和大米的低麸质饮食的比较——代谢障碍志愿者6周随机临床试验

IF 4.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Enni Mannila,Petrus Nuotio,Anni Kuosmanen,Suchetana De Storvik,Anna Kårlund,Aija Jukkara,Milla-Maria Tauriainen,Johanna Närväinen,Marjukka Kolehmainen,Kaisa M Linderborg
{"title":"富含燕麦和大米的低麸质饮食的比较——代谢障碍志愿者6周随机临床试验","authors":"Enni Mannila,Petrus Nuotio,Anni Kuosmanen,Suchetana De Storvik,Anna Kårlund,Aija Jukkara,Milla-Maria Tauriainen,Johanna Närväinen,Marjukka Kolehmainen,Kaisa M Linderborg","doi":"10.1002/mnfr.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low-gluten diets (LGD) are also widely followed by people not suffering from coeliac disease. This study compared oats and rice as the main cereal source of an LGD in metabolically challenged volunteers. Volunteers (n = 69) were randomly assigned to an LGD, which was either rich in oats or rice, for 6 weeks. Before and after the intervention, concentrations of total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C, triacylglycerols, free fatty acids, glucose, and insulin were measured from fasting plasma samples; the volunteers also completed 4-day food and stool records, as well as questionnaires related to perceived gastrointestinal discomfort (Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale) and health (RAND-36). The intervention with oats resulted in a more substantial decrease in LDL-C (pgroup × time = 0.047), more frequently normal type stool (pgroup × time = 0.010), and bowel movements (pgroup × time = 0.038) than rice (group × time interaction). The rice group experienced more constipation symptoms (pgroup × time < 0.001) than the oat group, possibly due to a lower fiber intake (pgroup × time < 0.001). A greater waist circumference decrease was observed with rice than with oats (pgroup × time = 0.022). Our results suggest that oats improve both biochemical markers of cardiometabolic health and perceived gastrointestinal well-being compared to rice, thus being a crucial part of a nutritiously adequate LGD.","PeriodicalId":212,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Nutrition & Food Research","volume":"125 1","pages":"e70076"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Low-Gluten Diets Rich in Oats or Rice-A 6-Week Randomized Clinical Trial With Metabolically Challenged Volunteers.\",\"authors\":\"Enni Mannila,Petrus Nuotio,Anni Kuosmanen,Suchetana De Storvik,Anna Kårlund,Aija Jukkara,Milla-Maria Tauriainen,Johanna Närväinen,Marjukka Kolehmainen,Kaisa M Linderborg\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mnfr.70076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Low-gluten diets (LGD) are also widely followed by people not suffering from coeliac disease. This study compared oats and rice as the main cereal source of an LGD in metabolically challenged volunteers. Volunteers (n = 69) were randomly assigned to an LGD, which was either rich in oats or rice, for 6 weeks. Before and after the intervention, concentrations of total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C, triacylglycerols, free fatty acids, glucose, and insulin were measured from fasting plasma samples; the volunteers also completed 4-day food and stool records, as well as questionnaires related to perceived gastrointestinal discomfort (Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale) and health (RAND-36). The intervention with oats resulted in a more substantial decrease in LDL-C (pgroup × time = 0.047), more frequently normal type stool (pgroup × time = 0.010), and bowel movements (pgroup × time = 0.038) than rice (group × time interaction). The rice group experienced more constipation symptoms (pgroup × time < 0.001) than the oat group, possibly due to a lower fiber intake (pgroup × time < 0.001). A greater waist circumference decrease was observed with rice than with oats (pgroup × time = 0.022). Our results suggest that oats improve both biochemical markers of cardiometabolic health and perceived gastrointestinal well-being compared to rice, thus being a crucial part of a nutritiously adequate LGD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Nutrition & Food Research\",\"volume\":\"125 1\",\"pages\":\"e70076\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Nutrition & Food Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.70076\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Nutrition & Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.70076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

低麸质饮食(LGD)也广泛适用于没有乳糜泻的人。这项研究比较了燕麦和大米作为代谢障碍志愿者中LGD的主要谷物来源。志愿者(n = 69)被随机分配到富含燕麦或大米的低脂饮食中,为期6周。干预前后,测定空腹血浆样本中总胆固醇、LDL-C和HDL-C、三酰甘油、游离脂肪酸、葡萄糖和胰岛素的浓度;志愿者还完成了4天的食物和粪便记录,以及与感知胃肠道不适(胃肠道症状评定量表)和健康(RAND-36)相关的问卷调查。燕麦的干预导致LDL-C (p组×时间= 0.047)、更频繁的正常型大便(p组×时间= 0.010)和排便(p组×时间= 0.038)比大米(组×时间相互作用)的显著降低。与燕麦组相比,大米组出现了更多的便秘症状(p组×时间< 0.001),可能是由于纤维摄入量较低(p组×时间< 0.001)。与燕麦组相比,大米组的腰围减小幅度更大(p组×时间= 0.022)。我们的研究结果表明,与大米相比,燕麦改善了心脏代谢健康和胃肠道健康的生化指标,因此是营养充足的LGD的关键部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Low-Gluten Diets Rich in Oats or Rice-A 6-Week Randomized Clinical Trial With Metabolically Challenged Volunteers.
Low-gluten diets (LGD) are also widely followed by people not suffering from coeliac disease. This study compared oats and rice as the main cereal source of an LGD in metabolically challenged volunteers. Volunteers (n = 69) were randomly assigned to an LGD, which was either rich in oats or rice, for 6 weeks. Before and after the intervention, concentrations of total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C, triacylglycerols, free fatty acids, glucose, and insulin were measured from fasting plasma samples; the volunteers also completed 4-day food and stool records, as well as questionnaires related to perceived gastrointestinal discomfort (Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale) and health (RAND-36). The intervention with oats resulted in a more substantial decrease in LDL-C (pgroup × time = 0.047), more frequently normal type stool (pgroup × time = 0.010), and bowel movements (pgroup × time = 0.038) than rice (group × time interaction). The rice group experienced more constipation symptoms (pgroup × time < 0.001) than the oat group, possibly due to a lower fiber intake (pgroup × time < 0.001). A greater waist circumference decrease was observed with rice than with oats (pgroup × time = 0.022). Our results suggest that oats improve both biochemical markers of cardiometabolic health and perceived gastrointestinal well-being compared to rice, thus being a crucial part of a nutritiously adequate LGD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
1.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Nutrition & Food Research is a primary research journal devoted to health, safety and all aspects of molecular nutrition such as nutritional biochemistry, nutrigenomics and metabolomics aiming to link the information arising from related disciplines: Bioactivity: Nutritional and medical effects of food constituents including bioavailability and kinetics. Immunology: Understanding the interactions of food and the immune system. Microbiology: Food spoilage, food pathogens, chemical and physical approaches of fermented foods and novel microbial processes. Chemistry: Isolation and analysis of bioactive food ingredients while considering environmental aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信