噪声对使用光纤传感器同时预测水和油位的机器学习模型的影响

IF 4.6 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 OPTICS
Claunir Pavan , Helder R.O. Rocha , Arnaldo G. Leal-Junior , Maria J. Pontes , Marcelo E.V. Segatto
{"title":"噪声对使用光纤传感器同时预测水和油位的机器学习模型的影响","authors":"Claunir Pavan ,&nbsp;Helder R.O. Rocha ,&nbsp;Arnaldo G. Leal-Junior ,&nbsp;Maria J. Pontes ,&nbsp;Marcelo E.V. Segatto","doi":"10.1016/j.optlastec.2025.113056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We address the problem of simultaneously estimating the water-oil interface and total levels in three-phase separator tanks by applying three machine learning methods: Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KAN), and Random Forest (RF). Data was collected from Fiber Bragg Grating-based optical sensors and processed to suppress outliers using the Local Outlier Factor algorithm. Hyperparameters for each model were optimized using Grid Search, and their performance was compared. The trained models were also exposed to scenarios with different levels of noise, and performance was evaluated. The results suggest that KAN performs effectively in predicting liquid levels, achieving a Root Mean Square Error of less than 3 mm and a Mean Absolute Percentage Error below 0.3% in scenarios without noise. Both MLP and KAN exhibit similar accuracy when the noise level is up to 1%. However, the MLP model outperforms KAN in higher noisy scenarios. On the other hand, the RF model shows the least effectiveness overall in noisy environments, though it does maintain a relatively stable maximum error across different noise levels. Therefore, we demonstrate that KAN has advantages in low-noise scenarios compared to conventional MLP and RF models. Conversely, MLP is more effective under higher noise conditions. These findings can aid in the research and development of monitoring systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19511,"journal":{"name":"Optics and Laser Technology","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 113056"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of noise on machine learning models for simultaneously predicting water and oil levels using optical fiber sensors\",\"authors\":\"Claunir Pavan ,&nbsp;Helder R.O. Rocha ,&nbsp;Arnaldo G. Leal-Junior ,&nbsp;Maria J. Pontes ,&nbsp;Marcelo E.V. Segatto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optlastec.2025.113056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We address the problem of simultaneously estimating the water-oil interface and total levels in three-phase separator tanks by applying three machine learning methods: Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KAN), and Random Forest (RF). Data was collected from Fiber Bragg Grating-based optical sensors and processed to suppress outliers using the Local Outlier Factor algorithm. Hyperparameters for each model were optimized using Grid Search, and their performance was compared. The trained models were also exposed to scenarios with different levels of noise, and performance was evaluated. The results suggest that KAN performs effectively in predicting liquid levels, achieving a Root Mean Square Error of less than 3 mm and a Mean Absolute Percentage Error below 0.3% in scenarios without noise. Both MLP and KAN exhibit similar accuracy when the noise level is up to 1%. However, the MLP model outperforms KAN in higher noisy scenarios. On the other hand, the RF model shows the least effectiveness overall in noisy environments, though it does maintain a relatively stable maximum error across different noise levels. Therefore, we demonstrate that KAN has advantages in low-noise scenarios compared to conventional MLP and RF models. Conversely, MLP is more effective under higher noise conditions. These findings can aid in the research and development of monitoring systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optics and Laser Technology\",\"volume\":\"189 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113056\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optics and Laser Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030399225006474\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optics and Laser Technology","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030399225006474","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们通过应用三种机器学习方法:多层感知器(MLP)、Kolmogorov-Arnold网络(KAN)和随机森林(RF)来解决同时估计三相分离罐中水-油界面和总液位的问题。数据采集自基于光纤布拉格光栅的光传感器,并使用局部离群因子算法进行处理以抑制离群值。利用网格搜索对各模型的超参数进行优化,并对其性能进行比较。训练后的模型也暴露在不同噪音水平的场景中,并对其性能进行评估。结果表明,KAN在预测液位方面表现有效,在无噪声的情况下,其均方根误差小于3mm,平均绝对百分比误差小于0.3%。当噪声水平高达1%时,MLP和KAN都具有相似的精度。然而,MLP模型在高噪声情况下优于KAN。另一方面,尽管RF模型在不同噪声水平下保持相对稳定的最大误差,但它在噪声环境中的总体有效性最低。因此,我们证明了与传统的MLP和RF模型相比,KAN在低噪声场景下具有优势。相反,MLP在高噪声条件下更有效。这些发现有助于监测系统的研究和开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of noise on machine learning models for simultaneously predicting water and oil levels using optical fiber sensors
We address the problem of simultaneously estimating the water-oil interface and total levels in three-phase separator tanks by applying three machine learning methods: Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KAN), and Random Forest (RF). Data was collected from Fiber Bragg Grating-based optical sensors and processed to suppress outliers using the Local Outlier Factor algorithm. Hyperparameters for each model were optimized using Grid Search, and their performance was compared. The trained models were also exposed to scenarios with different levels of noise, and performance was evaluated. The results suggest that KAN performs effectively in predicting liquid levels, achieving a Root Mean Square Error of less than 3 mm and a Mean Absolute Percentage Error below 0.3% in scenarios without noise. Both MLP and KAN exhibit similar accuracy when the noise level is up to 1%. However, the MLP model outperforms KAN in higher noisy scenarios. On the other hand, the RF model shows the least effectiveness overall in noisy environments, though it does maintain a relatively stable maximum error across different noise levels. Therefore, we demonstrate that KAN has advantages in low-noise scenarios compared to conventional MLP and RF models. Conversely, MLP is more effective under higher noise conditions. These findings can aid in the research and development of monitoring systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1060
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Optics & Laser Technology aims to provide a vehicle for the publication of a broad range of high quality research and review papers in those fields of scientific and engineering research appertaining to the development and application of the technology of optics and lasers. Papers describing original work in these areas are submitted to rigorous refereeing prior to acceptance for publication. The scope of Optics & Laser Technology encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: •development in all types of lasers •developments in optoelectronic devices and photonics •developments in new photonics and optical concepts •developments in conventional optics, optical instruments and components •techniques of optical metrology, including interferometry and optical fibre sensors •LIDAR and other non-contact optical measurement techniques, including optical methods in heat and fluid flow •applications of lasers to materials processing, optical NDT display (including holography) and optical communication •research and development in the field of laser safety including studies of hazards resulting from the applications of lasers (laser safety, hazards of laser fume) •developments in optical computing and optical information processing •developments in new optical materials •developments in new optical characterization methods and techniques •developments in quantum optics •developments in light assisted micro and nanofabrication methods and techniques •developments in nanophotonics and biophotonics •developments in imaging processing and systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信