评估基于机器学习的低压网络电压计算的鲁棒性

IF 4.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Orlando Pereira , Vincenzo Bassi , Tansu Alpcan , Luis F. Ochoa
{"title":"评估基于机器学习的低压网络电压计算的鲁棒性","authors":"Orlando Pereira ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Bassi ,&nbsp;Tansu Alpcan ,&nbsp;Luis F. Ochoa","doi":"10.1016/j.segan.2025.101716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integration of distributed energy resources (DERs) into low-voltage (LV) distribution networks requires distribution companies to assess customer voltages for new scenarios involving larger generation (from solar PVs) or increased demand (from electric vehicles [EVs]). Voltage calculations typically depend on power flow analyses, which require detailed three-phase electrical models that are often unavailable for LV networks. As an alternative, machine learning (ML) models can leverage historical smart meter data (active power [P], reactive power [Q] and voltage magnitudes [V]) to capture the underlying physics of the LV network and calculate customer voltages for new scenarios without relying on electrical models. However, their robustness in scenarios beyond their training scope is often overlooked, leading to errors in determining how much DER capacity an LV network can handle. This paper evaluates the robustness of ML-based voltage calculations using Neural Networks (NNs) and Linear Regression (LR), in scenarios that remain within (in-domain) and beyond (out-of-domain) the historical data ranges, such as having more solar PV or EVs. A voltage sensitivity analysis assesses each model’s ability to capture the network’s response to changes in P and Q. The study uses synthetic data from a realistic Australian LV network comprising 31 single-phase customers and 25 % PV penetration. Results indicate that LR models calculate voltages more accurately than NNs, especially in out-of-domain scenarios, although all models exhibit limitations in capturing the network’s sensitivity to P and Q. These findings highlight the need for improving ML models to ensure reliable voltage calculations for applications involving DER integration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56142,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy Grids & Networks","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 101716"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the robustness of machine learning-based voltage calculations for LV networks\",\"authors\":\"Orlando Pereira ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Bassi ,&nbsp;Tansu Alpcan ,&nbsp;Luis F. Ochoa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.segan.2025.101716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The integration of distributed energy resources (DERs) into low-voltage (LV) distribution networks requires distribution companies to assess customer voltages for new scenarios involving larger generation (from solar PVs) or increased demand (from electric vehicles [EVs]). Voltage calculations typically depend on power flow analyses, which require detailed three-phase electrical models that are often unavailable for LV networks. As an alternative, machine learning (ML) models can leverage historical smart meter data (active power [P], reactive power [Q] and voltage magnitudes [V]) to capture the underlying physics of the LV network and calculate customer voltages for new scenarios without relying on electrical models. However, their robustness in scenarios beyond their training scope is often overlooked, leading to errors in determining how much DER capacity an LV network can handle. This paper evaluates the robustness of ML-based voltage calculations using Neural Networks (NNs) and Linear Regression (LR), in scenarios that remain within (in-domain) and beyond (out-of-domain) the historical data ranges, such as having more solar PV or EVs. A voltage sensitivity analysis assesses each model’s ability to capture the network’s response to changes in P and Q. The study uses synthetic data from a realistic Australian LV network comprising 31 single-phase customers and 25 % PV penetration. Results indicate that LR models calculate voltages more accurately than NNs, especially in out-of-domain scenarios, although all models exhibit limitations in capturing the network’s sensitivity to P and Q. These findings highlight the need for improving ML models to ensure reliable voltage calculations for applications involving DER integration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Energy Grids & Networks\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101716\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Energy Grids & Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352467725000980\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy Grids & Networks","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352467725000980","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将分布式能源(DERs)整合到低压(LV)配电网络中,要求配电公司评估客户电压,以适应涉及更大发电量(来自太阳能pv)或需求增加(来自电动汽车[ev])的新方案。电压计算通常依赖于潮流分析,这需要详细的三相电模型,而低压电网通常无法获得这些模型。作为替代方案,机器学习(ML)模型可以利用历史智能电表数据(有功功率[P],无功功率[Q]和电压幅值[V])来捕获低压网络的底层物理特性,并在不依赖电气模型的情况下计算新场景的客户电压。然而,它们在超出其训练范围的场景中的鲁棒性经常被忽视,从而导致在确定LV网络可以处理多少DER容量时出现错误。本文使用神经网络(nn)和线性回归(LR)评估了基于ml的电压计算的鲁棒性,在(域内)和(域外)历史数据范围内的场景中,例如拥有更多的太阳能光伏或电动汽车。电压敏感性分析评估了每个模型捕捉网络对P和q变化的响应的能力。该研究使用了一个现实的澳大利亚低压网络的综合数据,该网络包括31个单相客户和25% %的光伏渗透率。结果表明,尽管所有模型在捕获网络对P和q的敏感性方面都存在局限性,但LR模型比nn更准确地计算电压,特别是在域外场景下。这些发现强调了改进ML模型以确保涉及DER集成的应用中可靠的电压计算的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the robustness of machine learning-based voltage calculations for LV networks
The integration of distributed energy resources (DERs) into low-voltage (LV) distribution networks requires distribution companies to assess customer voltages for new scenarios involving larger generation (from solar PVs) or increased demand (from electric vehicles [EVs]). Voltage calculations typically depend on power flow analyses, which require detailed three-phase electrical models that are often unavailable for LV networks. As an alternative, machine learning (ML) models can leverage historical smart meter data (active power [P], reactive power [Q] and voltage magnitudes [V]) to capture the underlying physics of the LV network and calculate customer voltages for new scenarios without relying on electrical models. However, their robustness in scenarios beyond their training scope is often overlooked, leading to errors in determining how much DER capacity an LV network can handle. This paper evaluates the robustness of ML-based voltage calculations using Neural Networks (NNs) and Linear Regression (LR), in scenarios that remain within (in-domain) and beyond (out-of-domain) the historical data ranges, such as having more solar PV or EVs. A voltage sensitivity analysis assesses each model’s ability to capture the network’s response to changes in P and Q. The study uses synthetic data from a realistic Australian LV network comprising 31 single-phase customers and 25 % PV penetration. Results indicate that LR models calculate voltages more accurately than NNs, especially in out-of-domain scenarios, although all models exhibit limitations in capturing the network’s sensitivity to P and Q. These findings highlight the need for improving ML models to ensure reliable voltage calculations for applications involving DER integration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Energy Grids & Networks
Sustainable Energy Grids & Networks Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
13.00%
发文量
206
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks (SEGAN)is an international peer-reviewed publication for theoretical and applied research dealing with energy, information grids and power networks, including smart grids from super to micro grid scales. SEGAN welcomes papers describing fundamental advances in mathematical, statistical or computational methods with application to power and energy systems, as well as papers on applications, computation and modeling in the areas of electrical and energy systems with coupled information and communication technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信