{"title":"亚麻籽(Linum usitatissimum L.)和奇亚籽(Salvia hispanica L.)在体外调节粪便微生物群组成和功能的比较研究","authors":"Seda Arioglu-Tuncil","doi":"10.1002/fsn3.70243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Flaxseed (<i>Linum usitatissimum</i> L.) and chia seed (<i>Salvia hispanica</i> L.) have become increasingly popular in the design of various functional food products. However, information on their functional properties is scarce. The aim of this study is to comparatively evaluate the effects of the dietary fibers (DFs) of flaxseed and chia seed on colonic microbiota composition and metabolic outputs. The neutral and acidic monosaccharide compositions of DFs of flaxseed and chia seed were determined using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and spectrophotometer, respectively. Next, in vitro fecal fermentation assays were applied, and samples were collected at different time points for short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) measurements using GC, and fecal microbiota changes before and after fermentation were evaluated through 16S rRNA sequencing. The results revealed that DFs of flaxseed were dominated by xylose and uronic acid moieties, while that of chia seed was dominated by glucose units, indicating that their DFs are structurally different. Higher SCFA generations were observed in the case of flaxseed, suggesting that flaxseed DFs are more readily fermentable by gut microbiota. Flaxseed and chia seed DFs differentially impacted the microbiota compositions at the OTU level; for example, significant increases in the relative abundances of <i>Acidaminococcaceae</i> and <i>Bacteroides stercoris</i> related OTUs, which are known to be propionate producers, were observed in the case of flaxseed, but not chia seed. Interestingly, flaxseed, but not chia seed, DFs suppressed the growth of some pathogenic bacteria. Overall, this study suggests that the functionality of flaxseed and chia seed DFs in relation to colonic microbiota may differ, with flaxseed being more readily fermented and potentially promoting beneficial microbes to a greater extent. Thus, flaxseed could hold promise for developing functional food recipes aimed at supporting colonic health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12418,"journal":{"name":"Food Science & Nutrition","volume":"13 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fsn3.70243","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Assessment of Flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) and Chia Seed (Salvia hispanica L.) in Modulating Fecal Microbiota Composition and Function In Vitro\",\"authors\":\"Seda Arioglu-Tuncil\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fsn3.70243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Flaxseed (<i>Linum usitatissimum</i> L.) and chia seed (<i>Salvia hispanica</i> L.) have become increasingly popular in the design of various functional food products. However, information on their functional properties is scarce. The aim of this study is to comparatively evaluate the effects of the dietary fibers (DFs) of flaxseed and chia seed on colonic microbiota composition and metabolic outputs. The neutral and acidic monosaccharide compositions of DFs of flaxseed and chia seed were determined using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and spectrophotometer, respectively. Next, in vitro fecal fermentation assays were applied, and samples were collected at different time points for short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) measurements using GC, and fecal microbiota changes before and after fermentation were evaluated through 16S rRNA sequencing. The results revealed that DFs of flaxseed were dominated by xylose and uronic acid moieties, while that of chia seed was dominated by glucose units, indicating that their DFs are structurally different. Higher SCFA generations were observed in the case of flaxseed, suggesting that flaxseed DFs are more readily fermentable by gut microbiota. Flaxseed and chia seed DFs differentially impacted the microbiota compositions at the OTU level; for example, significant increases in the relative abundances of <i>Acidaminococcaceae</i> and <i>Bacteroides stercoris</i> related OTUs, which are known to be propionate producers, were observed in the case of flaxseed, but not chia seed. Interestingly, flaxseed, but not chia seed, DFs suppressed the growth of some pathogenic bacteria. Overall, this study suggests that the functionality of flaxseed and chia seed DFs in relation to colonic microbiota may differ, with flaxseed being more readily fermented and potentially promoting beneficial microbes to a greater extent. Thus, flaxseed could hold promise for developing functional food recipes aimed at supporting colonic health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Science & Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fsn3.70243\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Science & Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsn3.70243\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science & Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsn3.70243","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
亚麻籽(Linum usitatissimum L.)和奇亚籽(Salvia hispanica L.)在各种功能性食品的设计中越来越受欢迎。然而,关于它们的功能特性的信息很少。本研究旨在比较评价亚麻籽和奇亚籽膳食纤维对仔猪结肠菌群组成和代谢产物的影响。采用气相色谱/质谱(GC/MS)和分光光度计分别测定了亚麻籽和奇亚籽DFs中中性和酸性单糖的组成。接下来,采用体外粪便发酵实验,在不同时间点采集样品,采用气相色谱法测定短链脂肪酸(SCFA),并通过16S rRNA测序评估发酵前后粪便微生物群的变化。结果表明,亚麻籽的DFs以木糖和醛酸为主,而奇亚籽的DFs以葡萄糖为主,两者在结构上存在差异。在亚麻籽中观察到更高的SCFA世代,这表明亚麻籽中的DFs更容易被肠道微生物群发酵。亚麻籽和奇亚籽的DFs在OTU水平上对微生物群组成的影响存在差异;例如,在亚麻籽中观察到酸胺球菌科和粪杆菌相关的OTUs的相对丰度显著增加,而这些OTUs已知是丙酸盐的产生者,而奇亚籽则没有。有趣的是,亚麻籽,而不是奇亚籽,DFs抑制了一些致病菌的生长。总的来说,本研究表明亚麻籽和奇亚籽的DFs对结肠微生物群的功能可能不同,亚麻籽更容易发酵,可能在更大程度上促进有益微生物的生长。因此,亚麻籽有望开发功能性食品配方,旨在支持结肠健康。
A Comparative Assessment of Flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) and Chia Seed (Salvia hispanica L.) in Modulating Fecal Microbiota Composition and Function In Vitro
Flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) and chia seed (Salvia hispanica L.) have become increasingly popular in the design of various functional food products. However, information on their functional properties is scarce. The aim of this study is to comparatively evaluate the effects of the dietary fibers (DFs) of flaxseed and chia seed on colonic microbiota composition and metabolic outputs. The neutral and acidic monosaccharide compositions of DFs of flaxseed and chia seed were determined using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and spectrophotometer, respectively. Next, in vitro fecal fermentation assays were applied, and samples were collected at different time points for short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) measurements using GC, and fecal microbiota changes before and after fermentation were evaluated through 16S rRNA sequencing. The results revealed that DFs of flaxseed were dominated by xylose and uronic acid moieties, while that of chia seed was dominated by glucose units, indicating that their DFs are structurally different. Higher SCFA generations were observed in the case of flaxseed, suggesting that flaxseed DFs are more readily fermentable by gut microbiota. Flaxseed and chia seed DFs differentially impacted the microbiota compositions at the OTU level; for example, significant increases in the relative abundances of Acidaminococcaceae and Bacteroides stercoris related OTUs, which are known to be propionate producers, were observed in the case of flaxseed, but not chia seed. Interestingly, flaxseed, but not chia seed, DFs suppressed the growth of some pathogenic bacteria. Overall, this study suggests that the functionality of flaxseed and chia seed DFs in relation to colonic microbiota may differ, with flaxseed being more readily fermented and potentially promoting beneficial microbes to a greater extent. Thus, flaxseed could hold promise for developing functional food recipes aimed at supporting colonic health.
期刊介绍:
Food Science & Nutrition is the peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of food science and nutrition. The Journal will consider submissions of quality papers describing the results of fundamental and applied research related to all aspects of human food and nutrition, as well as interdisciplinary research that spans these two fields.