Andrea Moglia, Matteo Cavicchioli, Luca Mainardi, Pietro Cerveri
{"title":"计算机断层扫描胰腺分割的深度学习:系统综述","authors":"Andrea Moglia, Matteo Cavicchioli, Luca Mainardi, Pietro Cerveri","doi":"10.1007/s10462-024-11050-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pancreas segmentation has been traditionally challenging due to its small size in computed tomography abdominal volumes, high variability of shape and positions among patients, and blurred boundaries due to low contrast between the pancreas and surrounding organs. Many deep learning models for pancreas segmentation have been proposed in the past few years. We present a thorough systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. The literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore on original studies published in peer-reviewed journals from 2013 to 2023. Overall, 130 studies were retrieved. We initially provide an overview of the technical background of the most common network architectures and publicly available datasets. Then, the analysis of the studies combining visual presentation in tabular form and text description is reported. The tables group the studies specifying the application, dataset size, design (model architecture, learning strategy, loss function, and training protocol), results, and main contributions. We first analyze the studies focusing on parenchyma segmentation using datasets with only pancreas annotations, followed by those using datasets with multi-organ annotations. Then, we analyze the studies on the segmentation of tumors, cysts, and inflammation. The studies are clustered according to the different deep learning architectures. Finally, we discuss the main findings from the published literature, the challenges, and the directions for future research on the clinical need, deep learning and foundation models, datasets, and clinical translation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-024-11050-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning for pancreas segmentation on computed tomography: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Moglia, Matteo Cavicchioli, Luca Mainardi, Pietro Cerveri\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10462-024-11050-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Pancreas segmentation has been traditionally challenging due to its small size in computed tomography abdominal volumes, high variability of shape and positions among patients, and blurred boundaries due to low contrast between the pancreas and surrounding organs. Many deep learning models for pancreas segmentation have been proposed in the past few years. We present a thorough systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. The literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore on original studies published in peer-reviewed journals from 2013 to 2023. Overall, 130 studies were retrieved. We initially provide an overview of the technical background of the most common network architectures and publicly available datasets. Then, the analysis of the studies combining visual presentation in tabular form and text description is reported. The tables group the studies specifying the application, dataset size, design (model architecture, learning strategy, loss function, and training protocol), results, and main contributions. We first analyze the studies focusing on parenchyma segmentation using datasets with only pancreas annotations, followed by those using datasets with multi-organ annotations. Then, we analyze the studies on the segmentation of tumors, cysts, and inflammation. The studies are clustered according to the different deep learning architectures. Finally, we discuss the main findings from the published literature, the challenges, and the directions for future research on the clinical need, deep learning and foundation models, datasets, and clinical translation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence Review\",\"volume\":\"58 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-024-11050-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-024-11050-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-024-11050-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
胰腺分割在传统上一直具有挑战性,因为它在计算机断层扫描腹部体积中体积小,患者之间形状和位置的高度可变性,以及胰腺和周围器官之间的低对比度导致边界模糊。在过去的几年里,人们提出了许多胰腺分割的深度学习模型。我们提出了一个全面的系统评价基于首选报告项目的系统评价和荟萃分析声明。文献检索是在PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和IEEE explore上对2013年至2023年在同行评议期刊上发表的原创研究进行的。总共检索了130项研究。我们首先概述了最常见的网络架构和公开可用的数据集的技术背景。然后,对表格形式的视觉呈现与文字描述相结合的研究进行了分析。表格将研究分组,指定应用程序、数据集大小、设计(模型架构、学习策略、损失函数和训练协议)、结果和主要贡献。我们首先分析了仅使用胰腺注释的数据集关注实质分割的研究,然后是使用多器官注释的数据集的研究。然后,我们分析了肿瘤、囊肿和炎症的分割研究。这些研究是根据不同的深度学习架构聚类的。最后,我们从临床需求、深度学习和基础模型、数据集和临床翻译等方面讨论了已发表文献的主要发现、面临的挑战和未来研究的方向。
Deep learning for pancreas segmentation on computed tomography: a systematic review
Pancreas segmentation has been traditionally challenging due to its small size in computed tomography abdominal volumes, high variability of shape and positions among patients, and blurred boundaries due to low contrast between the pancreas and surrounding organs. Many deep learning models for pancreas segmentation have been proposed in the past few years. We present a thorough systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. The literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore on original studies published in peer-reviewed journals from 2013 to 2023. Overall, 130 studies were retrieved. We initially provide an overview of the technical background of the most common network architectures and publicly available datasets. Then, the analysis of the studies combining visual presentation in tabular form and text description is reported. The tables group the studies specifying the application, dataset size, design (model architecture, learning strategy, loss function, and training protocol), results, and main contributions. We first analyze the studies focusing on parenchyma segmentation using datasets with only pancreas annotations, followed by those using datasets with multi-organ annotations. Then, we analyze the studies on the segmentation of tumors, cysts, and inflammation. The studies are clustered according to the different deep learning architectures. Finally, we discuss the main findings from the published literature, the challenges, and the directions for future research on the clinical need, deep learning and foundation models, datasets, and clinical translation.
期刊介绍:
Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.