评估人工智能驱动的腰椎管狭窄MRI预测解决方案:系统综述

IF 10.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Mugahed A. Al-antari, Saied Salem, Mukhlis Raza, Ahmed S. Elbadawy, Ertan Bütün, Ahmet Arif Aydin, Murat Aydoğan, Bilal Ertuğrul, Muhammed Talo, Yeong Hyeon Gu
{"title":"评估人工智能驱动的腰椎管狭窄MRI预测解决方案:系统综述","authors":"Mugahed A. Al-antari,&nbsp;Saied Salem,&nbsp;Mukhlis Raza,&nbsp;Ahmed S. Elbadawy,&nbsp;Ertan Bütün,&nbsp;Ahmet Arif Aydin,&nbsp;Murat Aydoğan,&nbsp;Bilal Ertuğrul,&nbsp;Muhammed Talo,&nbsp;Yeong Hyeon Gu","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11185-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) involves the narrowing of the spinal canal, leading to compression of the spinal cord and nerves in the lower back. Common causes include injuries, degenerative age-related changes, congenital conditions, and tumors, all of which contribute to back pain. Early diagnosis is critical for symptom management, preventing progression, and preserving quality of life. This study systematically reviews AI-based approaches for predicting LSS using MRI axial and sagittal imaging. The review focuses on various AI tasks: detection, segmentation, classification, hybrid approaches, spinal index measurements (SIM), and explainable AI frameworks. The aim is to highlight current knowledge, identify limitations in existing models, and propose future research directions. Following PRISMA guidelines and the PICO method (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome), the review collects data from databases like PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and IEEE Xplore (2005–2024). The Rayyan AI tool is used for duplicate removal and screening. The screening process includes an initial review of titles and abstracts, followed by full-text appraisal. The Meta Quality Appraisal Tool (MetaQAT) assesses the quality of selected articles. Of 1323 records, 97 duplicates were removed. After screening, 895 records were excluded, leaving 331 for full-text review. Among these, 184 articles were excluded for lacking AI relevance. Ultimately, 95 key articles (91 technical papers and 4 reviews) were identified for their contributions to AI-based LSS prediction. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of AI techniques in LSS prediction, guiding future research and advancing understanding in areas like explainable AI and large language models (LLMs).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11185-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating AI-powered predictive solutions for MRI in lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Mugahed A. Al-antari,&nbsp;Saied Salem,&nbsp;Mukhlis Raza,&nbsp;Ahmed S. Elbadawy,&nbsp;Ertan Bütün,&nbsp;Ahmet Arif Aydin,&nbsp;Murat Aydoğan,&nbsp;Bilal Ertuğrul,&nbsp;Muhammed Talo,&nbsp;Yeong Hyeon Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10462-025-11185-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) involves the narrowing of the spinal canal, leading to compression of the spinal cord and nerves in the lower back. Common causes include injuries, degenerative age-related changes, congenital conditions, and tumors, all of which contribute to back pain. Early diagnosis is critical for symptom management, preventing progression, and preserving quality of life. This study systematically reviews AI-based approaches for predicting LSS using MRI axial and sagittal imaging. The review focuses on various AI tasks: detection, segmentation, classification, hybrid approaches, spinal index measurements (SIM), and explainable AI frameworks. The aim is to highlight current knowledge, identify limitations in existing models, and propose future research directions. Following PRISMA guidelines and the PICO method (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome), the review collects data from databases like PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and IEEE Xplore (2005–2024). The Rayyan AI tool is used for duplicate removal and screening. The screening process includes an initial review of titles and abstracts, followed by full-text appraisal. The Meta Quality Appraisal Tool (MetaQAT) assesses the quality of selected articles. Of 1323 records, 97 duplicates were removed. After screening, 895 records were excluded, leaving 331 for full-text review. Among these, 184 articles were excluded for lacking AI relevance. Ultimately, 95 key articles (91 technical papers and 4 reviews) were identified for their contributions to AI-based LSS prediction. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of AI techniques in LSS prediction, guiding future research and advancing understanding in areas like explainable AI and large language models (LLMs).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence Review\",\"volume\":\"58 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11185-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11185-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11185-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)涉及椎管狭窄,导致脊髓和下背部神经受压。常见的原因包括损伤、退行性年龄相关变化、先天性疾病和肿瘤,所有这些都会导致背痛。早期诊断对于症状管理、预防进展和保持生活质量至关重要。本研究系统地回顾了基于人工智能的MRI轴位和矢状位成像预测LSS的方法。该综述侧重于各种人工智能任务:检测、分割、分类、混合方法、脊柱指数测量(SIM)和可解释的人工智能框架。其目的是突出当前的知识,识别现有模型的局限性,并提出未来的研究方向。本综述遵循PRISMA指南和PICO方法(人口、干预、比较、结果),从PubMed、Web of Science、ScienceDirect和IEEE Xplore(2005-2024)等数据库收集数据。Rayyan AI工具用于重复删除和筛选。筛选过程包括对标题和摘要进行初步审查,然后对全文进行评估。Meta质量评估工具(MetaQAT)评估选定文章的质量。在1323条记录中,删除了97条重复记录。经筛选,895条记录被排除,331条记录作为全文审查。其中,184篇文章因缺乏AI相关性而被排除在外。最终,95篇关键文章(91篇技术论文和4篇综述)因其对基于ai的LSS预测的贡献而被确定。本文全面分析了人工智能技术在LSS预测中的应用,指导了未来的研究,并促进了对可解释人工智能和大型语言模型(llm)等领域的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating AI-powered predictive solutions for MRI in lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) involves the narrowing of the spinal canal, leading to compression of the spinal cord and nerves in the lower back. Common causes include injuries, degenerative age-related changes, congenital conditions, and tumors, all of which contribute to back pain. Early diagnosis is critical for symptom management, preventing progression, and preserving quality of life. This study systematically reviews AI-based approaches for predicting LSS using MRI axial and sagittal imaging. The review focuses on various AI tasks: detection, segmentation, classification, hybrid approaches, spinal index measurements (SIM), and explainable AI frameworks. The aim is to highlight current knowledge, identify limitations in existing models, and propose future research directions. Following PRISMA guidelines and the PICO method (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome), the review collects data from databases like PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and IEEE Xplore (2005–2024). The Rayyan AI tool is used for duplicate removal and screening. The screening process includes an initial review of titles and abstracts, followed by full-text appraisal. The Meta Quality Appraisal Tool (MetaQAT) assesses the quality of selected articles. Of 1323 records, 97 duplicates were removed. After screening, 895 records were excluded, leaving 331 for full-text review. Among these, 184 articles were excluded for lacking AI relevance. Ultimately, 95 key articles (91 technical papers and 4 reviews) were identified for their contributions to AI-based LSS prediction. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of AI techniques in LSS prediction, guiding future research and advancing understanding in areas like explainable AI and large language models (LLMs).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信