恶性血液病患者的抗菌素耐药性:一项范围审查

Ya Haddy Sallah, Vanessa F Bratti, Bahar Rafinejad-Farahani, Shalini Jayasekar Zurn, Sonali Johnson, André S Crestani, Maria I Dacoregio, Haris Majeed, Rouhi Fazelzad, Aliyah Pabani, Brooke E Wilson, Fernanda M Favorito, Fabio Ynoe de Moraes, Lillian Sung, Yehoda M Martei, Danielle Rodin
{"title":"恶性血液病患者的抗菌素耐药性:一项范围审查","authors":"Ya Haddy Sallah, Vanessa F Bratti, Bahar Rafinejad-Farahani, Shalini Jayasekar Zurn, Sonali Johnson, André S Crestani, Maria I Dacoregio, Haris Majeed, Rouhi Fazelzad, Aliyah Pabani, Brooke E Wilson, Fernanda M Favorito, Fabio Ynoe de Moraes, Lillian Sung, Yehoda M Martei, Danielle Rodin","doi":"10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00079-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a substantial global health threat. Patients with haematological malignancies have an increased risk of AMR infection due to disease-related and treatment-related immunosuppression. This scoping review searched four bibliographic databases from Jan 1, 2000, to Dec 7, 2023, for publications on AMR bacterial infections in patients with haematological malignancies and identified 274 eligible articles. AMR prevalence data extraction focused on WHO bacterial priority pathogens. The prevalence of AMR bacterial infections from seven WHO priority pathogens in patients with haematological malignancies was 35% (95% CI 30–40; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> 99·4%). The most frequent AMR infections reported were bloodstream infections, with the highest reported AMR pathogens in third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (pooled prevalence rate 44% [95% CI 23–64; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> 99·8%]), meticillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (43% [31–54; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> 95·9%]), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (41% [26–56; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> 96·2%]). 53 (65%) of the 81 studies that reported mortality showed higher mortality rates associated with AMR infections. 168 (61%) studies were conducted in high-income countries, with no studies published from the WHO Africa region, revealing a substantial data gap from low-income and middle-income regions. Future efforts should prioritise standardised reporting measures, robust surveillance, antimicrobial stewardship, and well designed clinical trials, particularly in under-represented regions, to mitigate the effect of AMR on cancer care.","PeriodicalId":22865,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Oncology","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial resistance in patients with haematological malignancies: a scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Ya Haddy Sallah, Vanessa F Bratti, Bahar Rafinejad-Farahani, Shalini Jayasekar Zurn, Sonali Johnson, André S Crestani, Maria I Dacoregio, Haris Majeed, Rouhi Fazelzad, Aliyah Pabani, Brooke E Wilson, Fernanda M Favorito, Fabio Ynoe de Moraes, Lillian Sung, Yehoda M Martei, Danielle Rodin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00079-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a substantial global health threat. Patients with haematological malignancies have an increased risk of AMR infection due to disease-related and treatment-related immunosuppression. This scoping review searched four bibliographic databases from Jan 1, 2000, to Dec 7, 2023, for publications on AMR bacterial infections in patients with haematological malignancies and identified 274 eligible articles. AMR prevalence data extraction focused on WHO bacterial priority pathogens. The prevalence of AMR bacterial infections from seven WHO priority pathogens in patients with haematological malignancies was 35% (95% CI 30–40; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> 99·4%). The most frequent AMR infections reported were bloodstream infections, with the highest reported AMR pathogens in third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (pooled prevalence rate 44% [95% CI 23–64; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> 99·8%]), meticillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (43% [31–54; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> 95·9%]), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (41% [26–56; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> 96·2%]). 53 (65%) of the 81 studies that reported mortality showed higher mortality rates associated with AMR infections. 168 (61%) studies were conducted in high-income countries, with no studies published from the WHO Africa region, revealing a substantial data gap from low-income and middle-income regions. Future efforts should prioritise standardised reporting measures, robust surveillance, antimicrobial stewardship, and well designed clinical trials, particularly in under-represented regions, to mitigate the effect of AMR on cancer care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet Oncology\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00079-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00079-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗菌素耐药性(AMR)是一个重大的全球健康威胁。血液学恶性肿瘤患者由于疾病相关和治疗相关的免疫抑制而增加AMR感染的风险。本综述检索了从2000年1月1日至2023年12月7日的4个文献数据库,检索了关于血液恶性肿瘤患者AMR细菌感染的出版物,并确定了274篇符合条件的文章。抗菌素耐药性流行率数据提取侧重于世卫组织细菌重点病原体。血液病恶性肿瘤患者中7种WHO重点病原体的AMR细菌感染患病率为35% (95% CI 30-40;I2 99·4%)。最常见的AMR感染报告为血流感染,最高的AMR病原体报告为第三代耐头孢菌素肠杆菌(总患病率44% [95% CI 23-64;I2 99·8%]),耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(43% [31-54;I2 95.9%]),耐万古霉素肠球菌(41%)[26-56;I2 96·2%)。在报告死亡率的81项研究中,53项(65%)显示与抗菌素耐药性感染相关的死亡率较高。在高收入国家开展了168项(61%)研究,世卫组织非洲区域没有发表任何研究,这表明低收入和中等收入区域存在巨大的数据差距。未来的努力应优先考虑标准化的报告措施、强有力的监测、抗微生物药物管理和精心设计的临床试验,特别是在代表性不足的地区,以减轻抗菌素耐药性对癌症治疗的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antimicrobial resistance in patients with haematological malignancies: a scoping review
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a substantial global health threat. Patients with haematological malignancies have an increased risk of AMR infection due to disease-related and treatment-related immunosuppression. This scoping review searched four bibliographic databases from Jan 1, 2000, to Dec 7, 2023, for publications on AMR bacterial infections in patients with haematological malignancies and identified 274 eligible articles. AMR prevalence data extraction focused on WHO bacterial priority pathogens. The prevalence of AMR bacterial infections from seven WHO priority pathogens in patients with haematological malignancies was 35% (95% CI 30–40; I2 99·4%). The most frequent AMR infections reported were bloodstream infections, with the highest reported AMR pathogens in third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (pooled prevalence rate 44% [95% CI 23–64; I2 99·8%]), meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (43% [31–54; I2 95·9%]), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (41% [26–56; I2 96·2%]). 53 (65%) of the 81 studies that reported mortality showed higher mortality rates associated with AMR infections. 168 (61%) studies were conducted in high-income countries, with no studies published from the WHO Africa region, revealing a substantial data gap from low-income and middle-income regions. Future efforts should prioritise standardised reporting measures, robust surveillance, antimicrobial stewardship, and well designed clinical trials, particularly in under-represented regions, to mitigate the effect of AMR on cancer care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信