投票箱中的绿色交通措施:低交通街区在2022年伦敦地方选举中的作用

IF 2.4 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Jamie Furlong , Athena Brook , Rachel Aldred , Charlie Hicks
{"title":"投票箱中的绿色交通措施:低交通街区在2022年伦敦地方选举中的作用","authors":"Jamie Furlong ,&nbsp;Athena Brook ,&nbsp;Rachel Aldred ,&nbsp;Charlie Hicks","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Like many green transport policies that restrict car use, England’s Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) have been controversial, with some schemes removed amidst local backlash and fervent online debate. Although overt policymaker support may facilitate LTN implementation, evidence on any electoral consequences remains limited. This paper combines electoral data with Twitter data on councillors’ tweets and stances on LTNs, based on sentiment analysis. It uses these two datasets to examine how tweeting about and/or publicly supporting LTNs affected the probability of incumbent Labour councillors being re-elected and the change in their relative vote shares at the 2022 London local elections. Using regression analysis, we find that neither tweeting at all about LTNs nor tweeting positively about LTNs reduced London Labour councillors’ relative vote shares, nor their chances of being re-elected. Rather, we found tentative evidence of a positive, albeit weak, electoral impact of tweeting positively about LTNs. Despite controversy and local exceptions, engaging positively on Twitter about LTNs seems not to have been politically damaging for incumbent Labour councillors. This is an important finding given the ongoing likely use of social media to build support for contentious but effective environmental policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 101459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green transport measures at the ballot box: The role of Low Traffic Neighbourhoods in the 2022 London local elections\",\"authors\":\"Jamie Furlong ,&nbsp;Athena Brook ,&nbsp;Rachel Aldred ,&nbsp;Charlie Hicks\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Like many green transport policies that restrict car use, England’s Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) have been controversial, with some schemes removed amidst local backlash and fervent online debate. Although overt policymaker support may facilitate LTN implementation, evidence on any electoral consequences remains limited. This paper combines electoral data with Twitter data on councillors’ tweets and stances on LTNs, based on sentiment analysis. It uses these two datasets to examine how tweeting about and/or publicly supporting LTNs affected the probability of incumbent Labour councillors being re-elected and the change in their relative vote shares at the 2022 London local elections. Using regression analysis, we find that neither tweeting at all about LTNs nor tweeting positively about LTNs reduced London Labour councillors’ relative vote shares, nor their chances of being re-elected. Rather, we found tentative evidence of a positive, albeit weak, electoral impact of tweeting positively about LTNs. Despite controversy and local exceptions, engaging positively on Twitter about LTNs seems not to have been politically damaging for incumbent Labour councillors. This is an important finding given the ongoing likely use of social media to build support for contentious but effective environmental policies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25000963\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25000963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

像许多限制汽车使用的绿色交通政策一样,英格兰的“低交通街区”(ltn)也一直备受争议,一些计划在当地的强烈反对和网上的激烈辩论中被取消。尽管政策制定者的公开支持可能会促进LTN的实施,但有关选举后果的证据仍然有限。本文基于情感分析,将选举数据与议员推文和ltn立场的Twitter数据结合起来。它使用这两个数据集来研究关于和/或公开支持ltn的推文如何影响现任工党议员再次当选的可能性,以及他们在2022年伦敦地方选举中相对投票份额的变化。使用回归分析,我们发现,无论是关于ltn的推文,还是对ltn的积极推文,都不会降低伦敦工党议员的相对投票份额,也不会降低他们再次当选的机会。相反,我们发现了初步证据,表明在推特上积极评价ltn对选举产生了积极(尽管微弱)影响。尽管存在争议和地方例外,但在Twitter上积极参与ltn似乎并未对现任工党议员造成政治损害。这是一个重要的发现,因为社会媒体正在不断地为有争议但有效的环境政策建立支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Green transport measures at the ballot box: The role of Low Traffic Neighbourhoods in the 2022 London local elections
Like many green transport policies that restrict car use, England’s Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) have been controversial, with some schemes removed amidst local backlash and fervent online debate. Although overt policymaker support may facilitate LTN implementation, evidence on any electoral consequences remains limited. This paper combines electoral data with Twitter data on councillors’ tweets and stances on LTNs, based on sentiment analysis. It uses these two datasets to examine how tweeting about and/or publicly supporting LTNs affected the probability of incumbent Labour councillors being re-elected and the change in their relative vote shares at the 2022 London local elections. Using regression analysis, we find that neither tweeting at all about LTNs nor tweeting positively about LTNs reduced London Labour councillors’ relative vote shares, nor their chances of being re-elected. Rather, we found tentative evidence of a positive, albeit weak, electoral impact of tweeting positively about LTNs. Despite controversy and local exceptions, engaging positively on Twitter about LTNs seems not to have been politically damaging for incumbent Labour councillors. This is an important finding given the ongoing likely use of social media to build support for contentious but effective environmental policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信