{"title":"“我使用聊天语言,但我应该这样做吗?”高等教育中学生对人工智能的实践和态度的多方法分析","authors":"Manuela Farinosi, Claudio Melchior","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have the potential to revolutionise educational practices, but their use raises ethical and organisational concerns for higher education institutions (HEIs). We investigated Italian students' perception and usage of AI tools at the University of Udine using questionnaires (<i>N</i> = 531) with fixed and open-ended items and semi-structured interviews (<i>N</i> = 60). The findings reveal that while over two-thirds of students use ChatGPT for personal purposes, 40.9% employ it for academic tasks, primarily for summarisation, clarification and content generation. Most students (70%) expressed awareness of ethical concerns, and 55% saw the potential value in using AI, if regulated, for specific learning activities. Students generally did not perceive a direct threat to their studies or career prospects, although 60% voiced reservations about potential negative impacts on broader societal functions. These results underscore the need for HEIs to implement regulations for AI tool use to balance innovation with ethical challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.70094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘I Use ChatGPT, but Should I?’ A Multi-Method Analysis of Students' Practices and Attitudes Towards AI in Higher Education\",\"authors\":\"Manuela Farinosi, Claudio Melchior\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejed.70094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have the potential to revolutionise educational practices, but their use raises ethical and organisational concerns for higher education institutions (HEIs). We investigated Italian students' perception and usage of AI tools at the University of Udine using questionnaires (<i>N</i> = 531) with fixed and open-ended items and semi-structured interviews (<i>N</i> = 60). The findings reveal that while over two-thirds of students use ChatGPT for personal purposes, 40.9% employ it for academic tasks, primarily for summarisation, clarification and content generation. Most students (70%) expressed awareness of ethical concerns, and 55% saw the potential value in using AI, if regulated, for specific learning activities. Students generally did not perceive a direct threat to their studies or career prospects, although 60% voiced reservations about potential negative impacts on broader societal functions. These results underscore the need for HEIs to implement regulations for AI tool use to balance innovation with ethical challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"60 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.70094\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70094\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
‘I Use ChatGPT, but Should I?’ A Multi-Method Analysis of Students' Practices and Attitudes Towards AI in Higher Education
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have the potential to revolutionise educational practices, but their use raises ethical and organisational concerns for higher education institutions (HEIs). We investigated Italian students' perception and usage of AI tools at the University of Udine using questionnaires (N = 531) with fixed and open-ended items and semi-structured interviews (N = 60). The findings reveal that while over two-thirds of students use ChatGPT for personal purposes, 40.9% employ it for academic tasks, primarily for summarisation, clarification and content generation. Most students (70%) expressed awareness of ethical concerns, and 55% saw the potential value in using AI, if regulated, for specific learning activities. Students generally did not perceive a direct threat to their studies or career prospects, although 60% voiced reservations about potential negative impacts on broader societal functions. These results underscore the need for HEIs to implement regulations for AI tool use to balance innovation with ethical challenges.
期刊介绍:
The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.