“我使用聊天语言,但我应该这样做吗?”高等教育中学生对人工智能的实践和态度的多方法分析

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Manuela Farinosi, Claudio Melchior
{"title":"“我使用聊天语言,但我应该这样做吗?”高等教育中学生对人工智能的实践和态度的多方法分析","authors":"Manuela Farinosi,&nbsp;Claudio Melchior","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have the potential to revolutionise educational practices, but their use raises ethical and organisational concerns for higher education institutions (HEIs). We investigated Italian students' perception and usage of AI tools at the University of Udine using questionnaires (<i>N</i> = 531) with fixed and open-ended items and semi-structured interviews (<i>N</i> = 60). The findings reveal that while over two-thirds of students use ChatGPT for personal purposes, 40.9% employ it for academic tasks, primarily for summarisation, clarification and content generation. Most students (70%) expressed awareness of ethical concerns, and 55% saw the potential value in using AI, if regulated, for specific learning activities. Students generally did not perceive a direct threat to their studies or career prospects, although 60% voiced reservations about potential negative impacts on broader societal functions. These results underscore the need for HEIs to implement regulations for AI tool use to balance innovation with ethical challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.70094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘I Use ChatGPT, but Should I?’ A Multi-Method Analysis of Students' Practices and Attitudes Towards AI in Higher Education\",\"authors\":\"Manuela Farinosi,&nbsp;Claudio Melchior\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejed.70094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have the potential to revolutionise educational practices, but their use raises ethical and organisational concerns for higher education institutions (HEIs). We investigated Italian students' perception and usage of AI tools at the University of Udine using questionnaires (<i>N</i> = 531) with fixed and open-ended items and semi-structured interviews (<i>N</i> = 60). The findings reveal that while over two-thirds of students use ChatGPT for personal purposes, 40.9% employ it for academic tasks, primarily for summarisation, clarification and content generation. Most students (70%) expressed awareness of ethical concerns, and 55% saw the potential value in using AI, if regulated, for specific learning activities. Students generally did not perceive a direct threat to their studies or career prospects, although 60% voiced reservations about potential negative impacts on broader societal functions. These results underscore the need for HEIs to implement regulations for AI tool use to balance innovation with ethical challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"60 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.70094\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70094\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)工具有可能彻底改变教育实践,但它们的使用引发了高等教育机构(HEIs)的道德和组织问题。我们调查了乌迪内大学的意大利学生对人工智能工具的感知和使用情况,使用了固定和开放式问卷(N = 531)和半结构化访谈(N = 60)。调查结果显示,虽然超过三分之二的学生将ChatGPT用于个人目的,但40.9%的学生将其用于学术任务,主要用于总结、澄清和内容生成。大多数学生(70%)表示意识到道德问题,55%的学生看到了在特定的学习活动中使用人工智能的潜在价值,如果受到监管。尽管60%的学生对其对更广泛的社会功能的潜在负面影响持保留态度,但他们普遍认为这不会对他们的学习或职业前景造成直接威胁。这些结果强调了高等教育机构实施人工智能工具使用法规的必要性,以平衡创新与道德挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

‘I Use ChatGPT, but Should I?’ A Multi-Method Analysis of Students' Practices and Attitudes Towards AI in Higher Education

‘I Use ChatGPT, but Should I?’ A Multi-Method Analysis of Students' Practices and Attitudes Towards AI in Higher Education

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have the potential to revolutionise educational practices, but their use raises ethical and organisational concerns for higher education institutions (HEIs). We investigated Italian students' perception and usage of AI tools at the University of Udine using questionnaires (N = 531) with fixed and open-ended items and semi-structured interviews (N = 60). The findings reveal that while over two-thirds of students use ChatGPT for personal purposes, 40.9% employ it for academic tasks, primarily for summarisation, clarification and content generation. Most students (70%) expressed awareness of ethical concerns, and 55% saw the potential value in using AI, if regulated, for specific learning activities. Students generally did not perceive a direct threat to their studies or career prospects, although 60% voiced reservations about potential negative impacts on broader societal functions. These results underscore the need for HEIs to implement regulations for AI tool use to balance innovation with ethical challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信