“这个国家是自由的,但只为少数人服务”:坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的非正式劳工、阶级政治和城市秩序

IF 5.4 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Michaela Collord , Sabatho Nyamsenda
{"title":"“这个国家是自由的,但只为少数人服务”:坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的非正式劳工、阶级政治和城市秩序","authors":"Michaela Collord ,&nbsp;Sabatho Nyamsenda","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article explores the relationships between regime consolidation, labour informality, and class formation in African cities. It examines how, as part of broader efforts to build political support, incumbent leaders and their parties manipulate class formation among urban informal workers.</div><div>A defining feature of Africa’s rapid urbanisation is the expansion of a large tranche of low-income informal workers. We argue that, in a manner reminiscent of colonial efforts to control a then emerging urban working class, leaders adopt approaches to regulating labour informality—especially workers’ <em>access to space</em> and their <em>symbolic recognition</em>—that then influence class formation. These regulatory interventions either encourage greater unity among workers, or else help divide an incipient ‘urban mass’, introducing hierarchies between ‘respectable’ classes of small-scale ‘entrepreneurs’ and their more unruly counterparts. Having drawn these distinctions, we further theorise how and why incumbent leaders pursue one strategy or another, arguing that they regulate informal workers—and seek to influence their intra-class solidarities—in ways consistent with efforts both to consolidate a ruling coalition and to counter opposition electoral pressures.</div><div>We explore this theory further through our case study—Tanzania’s commercial capital, Dar es Salaam. This involves contrasting the regulatory approaches adopted by Presidents John Pombe Magufuli (2015–2021) and Samia Suluhu Hassan (2021–), both from Tanzania’s long-time ruling party, CCM. For our empirical material, we combine focus groups, interviews, participant observation, and press reviews. Finally, while our case study involves an authoritarian regime, we use our conclusion to reflect further on commonalities and differences across regime types, democratic or authoritarian, and on the significance of class-differentiated experiences of freedom and repression in the city.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48463,"journal":{"name":"World Development","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 107027"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘This country is free, but for the few’: Informal labour, class politics, and urban order in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Michaela Collord ,&nbsp;Sabatho Nyamsenda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article explores the relationships between regime consolidation, labour informality, and class formation in African cities. It examines how, as part of broader efforts to build political support, incumbent leaders and their parties manipulate class formation among urban informal workers.</div><div>A defining feature of Africa’s rapid urbanisation is the expansion of a large tranche of low-income informal workers. We argue that, in a manner reminiscent of colonial efforts to control a then emerging urban working class, leaders adopt approaches to regulating labour informality—especially workers’ <em>access to space</em> and their <em>symbolic recognition</em>—that then influence class formation. These regulatory interventions either encourage greater unity among workers, or else help divide an incipient ‘urban mass’, introducing hierarchies between ‘respectable’ classes of small-scale ‘entrepreneurs’ and their more unruly counterparts. Having drawn these distinctions, we further theorise how and why incumbent leaders pursue one strategy or another, arguing that they regulate informal workers—and seek to influence their intra-class solidarities—in ways consistent with efforts both to consolidate a ruling coalition and to counter opposition electoral pressures.</div><div>We explore this theory further through our case study—Tanzania’s commercial capital, Dar es Salaam. This involves contrasting the regulatory approaches adopted by Presidents John Pombe Magufuli (2015–2021) and Samia Suluhu Hassan (2021–), both from Tanzania’s long-time ruling party, CCM. For our empirical material, we combine focus groups, interviews, participant observation, and press reviews. Finally, while our case study involves an authoritarian regime, we use our conclusion to reflect further on commonalities and differences across regime types, democratic or authoritarian, and on the significance of class-differentiated experiences of freedom and repression in the city.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Development\",\"volume\":\"192 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107027\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X25001123\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X25001123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了非洲城市中政权巩固、劳动力非正式化和阶级形成之间的关系。作为建立政治支持的更广泛努力的一部分,它研究了现任领导人及其政党如何操纵城市非正式工人中的阶级形成。非洲快速城市化的一个显著特征是大量低收入非正规工人的扩张。我们认为,以一种让人想起殖民时期控制当时新兴的城市工人阶级的努力的方式,领导人采用了规范劳动非正式性的方法——特别是工人进入空间和他们的象征性认识——然后影响阶级形成。这些监管干预措施要么鼓励工人之间的更大团结,要么帮助分化初期的“城市大众”,在“受人尊敬的”小规模“企业家”阶层和更不守规矩的同行之间引入等级制度。在得出这些区别之后,我们进一步理论化了现任领导人如何以及为什么会采取这样或那样的策略,认为他们监管非正式工人,并试图影响他们的阶级内部团结,其方式与巩固执政联盟和对抗反对派选举压力的努力相一致。我们通过坦桑尼亚商业之都达累斯萨拉姆的案例研究进一步探讨了这一理论。这包括对比来自坦桑尼亚长期执政党CCM的总统John Pombe Magufuli(2015-2021)和Samia Suluhu Hassan(2021 -)所采用的监管方法。对于我们的实证材料,我们结合了焦点小组、访谈、参与者观察和媒体评论。最后,虽然我们的案例研究涉及专制政权,但我们使用我们的结论进一步反映了不同政权类型(民主或专制)的共同点和差异,以及城市中自由和镇压的阶级分化经验的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘This country is free, but for the few’: Informal labour, class politics, and urban order in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
This article explores the relationships between regime consolidation, labour informality, and class formation in African cities. It examines how, as part of broader efforts to build political support, incumbent leaders and their parties manipulate class formation among urban informal workers.
A defining feature of Africa’s rapid urbanisation is the expansion of a large tranche of low-income informal workers. We argue that, in a manner reminiscent of colonial efforts to control a then emerging urban working class, leaders adopt approaches to regulating labour informality—especially workers’ access to space and their symbolic recognition—that then influence class formation. These regulatory interventions either encourage greater unity among workers, or else help divide an incipient ‘urban mass’, introducing hierarchies between ‘respectable’ classes of small-scale ‘entrepreneurs’ and their more unruly counterparts. Having drawn these distinctions, we further theorise how and why incumbent leaders pursue one strategy or another, arguing that they regulate informal workers—and seek to influence their intra-class solidarities—in ways consistent with efforts both to consolidate a ruling coalition and to counter opposition electoral pressures.
We explore this theory further through our case study—Tanzania’s commercial capital, Dar es Salaam. This involves contrasting the regulatory approaches adopted by Presidents John Pombe Magufuli (2015–2021) and Samia Suluhu Hassan (2021–), both from Tanzania’s long-time ruling party, CCM. For our empirical material, we combine focus groups, interviews, participant observation, and press reviews. Finally, while our case study involves an authoritarian regime, we use our conclusion to reflect further on commonalities and differences across regime types, democratic or authoritarian, and on the significance of class-differentiated experiences of freedom and repression in the city.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Development
World Development Multiple-
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
320
期刊介绍: World Development is a multi-disciplinary monthly journal of development studies. It seeks to explore ways of improving standards of living, and the human condition generally, by examining potential solutions to problems such as: poverty, unemployment, malnutrition, disease, lack of shelter, environmental degradation, inadequate scientific and technological resources, trade and payments imbalances, international debt, gender and ethnic discrimination, militarism and civil conflict, and lack of popular participation in economic and political life. Contributions offer constructive ideas and analysis, and highlight the lessons to be learned from the experiences of different nations, societies, and economies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信