{"title":"“这个国家是自由的,但只为少数人服务”:坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的非正式劳工、阶级政治和城市秩序","authors":"Michaela Collord , Sabatho Nyamsenda","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article explores the relationships between regime consolidation, labour informality, and class formation in African cities. It examines how, as part of broader efforts to build political support, incumbent leaders and their parties manipulate class formation among urban informal workers.</div><div>A defining feature of Africa’s rapid urbanisation is the expansion of a large tranche of low-income informal workers. We argue that, in a manner reminiscent of colonial efforts to control a then emerging urban working class, leaders adopt approaches to regulating labour informality—especially workers’ <em>access to space</em> and their <em>symbolic recognition</em>—that then influence class formation. These regulatory interventions either encourage greater unity among workers, or else help divide an incipient ‘urban mass’, introducing hierarchies between ‘respectable’ classes of small-scale ‘entrepreneurs’ and their more unruly counterparts. Having drawn these distinctions, we further theorise how and why incumbent leaders pursue one strategy or another, arguing that they regulate informal workers—and seek to influence their intra-class solidarities—in ways consistent with efforts both to consolidate a ruling coalition and to counter opposition electoral pressures.</div><div>We explore this theory further through our case study—Tanzania’s commercial capital, Dar es Salaam. This involves contrasting the regulatory approaches adopted by Presidents John Pombe Magufuli (2015–2021) and Samia Suluhu Hassan (2021–), both from Tanzania’s long-time ruling party, CCM. For our empirical material, we combine focus groups, interviews, participant observation, and press reviews. Finally, while our case study involves an authoritarian regime, we use our conclusion to reflect further on commonalities and differences across regime types, democratic or authoritarian, and on the significance of class-differentiated experiences of freedom and repression in the city.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48463,"journal":{"name":"World Development","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 107027"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘This country is free, but for the few’: Informal labour, class politics, and urban order in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Michaela Collord , Sabatho Nyamsenda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article explores the relationships between regime consolidation, labour informality, and class formation in African cities. It examines how, as part of broader efforts to build political support, incumbent leaders and their parties manipulate class formation among urban informal workers.</div><div>A defining feature of Africa’s rapid urbanisation is the expansion of a large tranche of low-income informal workers. We argue that, in a manner reminiscent of colonial efforts to control a then emerging urban working class, leaders adopt approaches to regulating labour informality—especially workers’ <em>access to space</em> and their <em>symbolic recognition</em>—that then influence class formation. These regulatory interventions either encourage greater unity among workers, or else help divide an incipient ‘urban mass’, introducing hierarchies between ‘respectable’ classes of small-scale ‘entrepreneurs’ and their more unruly counterparts. Having drawn these distinctions, we further theorise how and why incumbent leaders pursue one strategy or another, arguing that they regulate informal workers—and seek to influence their intra-class solidarities—in ways consistent with efforts both to consolidate a ruling coalition and to counter opposition electoral pressures.</div><div>We explore this theory further through our case study—Tanzania’s commercial capital, Dar es Salaam. This involves contrasting the regulatory approaches adopted by Presidents John Pombe Magufuli (2015–2021) and Samia Suluhu Hassan (2021–), both from Tanzania’s long-time ruling party, CCM. For our empirical material, we combine focus groups, interviews, participant observation, and press reviews. Finally, while our case study involves an authoritarian regime, we use our conclusion to reflect further on commonalities and differences across regime types, democratic or authoritarian, and on the significance of class-differentiated experiences of freedom and repression in the city.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Development\",\"volume\":\"192 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107027\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X25001123\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X25001123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
‘This country is free, but for the few’: Informal labour, class politics, and urban order in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
This article explores the relationships between regime consolidation, labour informality, and class formation in African cities. It examines how, as part of broader efforts to build political support, incumbent leaders and their parties manipulate class formation among urban informal workers.
A defining feature of Africa’s rapid urbanisation is the expansion of a large tranche of low-income informal workers. We argue that, in a manner reminiscent of colonial efforts to control a then emerging urban working class, leaders adopt approaches to regulating labour informality—especially workers’ access to space and their symbolic recognition—that then influence class formation. These regulatory interventions either encourage greater unity among workers, or else help divide an incipient ‘urban mass’, introducing hierarchies between ‘respectable’ classes of small-scale ‘entrepreneurs’ and their more unruly counterparts. Having drawn these distinctions, we further theorise how and why incumbent leaders pursue one strategy or another, arguing that they regulate informal workers—and seek to influence their intra-class solidarities—in ways consistent with efforts both to consolidate a ruling coalition and to counter opposition electoral pressures.
We explore this theory further through our case study—Tanzania’s commercial capital, Dar es Salaam. This involves contrasting the regulatory approaches adopted by Presidents John Pombe Magufuli (2015–2021) and Samia Suluhu Hassan (2021–), both from Tanzania’s long-time ruling party, CCM. For our empirical material, we combine focus groups, interviews, participant observation, and press reviews. Finally, while our case study involves an authoritarian regime, we use our conclusion to reflect further on commonalities and differences across regime types, democratic or authoritarian, and on the significance of class-differentiated experiences of freedom and repression in the city.
期刊介绍:
World Development is a multi-disciplinary monthly journal of development studies. It seeks to explore ways of improving standards of living, and the human condition generally, by examining potential solutions to problems such as: poverty, unemployment, malnutrition, disease, lack of shelter, environmental degradation, inadequate scientific and technological resources, trade and payments imbalances, international debt, gender and ethnic discrimination, militarism and civil conflict, and lack of popular participation in economic and political life. Contributions offer constructive ideas and analysis, and highlight the lessons to be learned from the experiences of different nations, societies, and economies.