{"title":"日本人第二语言汉语写作的多维分析","authors":"Qin Xu , Tomoji Tabata , Yu Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using corpus-based multi-dimensional analysis (MDA), this study investigated the linguistic variation in Chinese narrative and argumentative writing produced by native Chinese speakers (L1) and native Japanese students learning Chinese as a second language (L2). Results of exploratory factor analysis indicated three functional dimensions: (1) verb-centered narrative discourse versus noun-centered abstract informative discourse, (2) richness of lexical output, and (3) adverbial modification. Post hoc multiple comparison results of analyses of variance revealed that Chinese narrative and argumentative styles of writing show significant stylistic differences in Dimensions 1 and 2. Specifically, Chinese narrative writing shows a verb-centered narrative style, whereas argumentative writing employs an overall noun-centered abstract information style, and the vocabulary richness of the former style was significantly lower than that of the latter. The following significant differences were observed between L1 and L2 writing: (1) in Chinese narrative writing, L2 students were significantly weaker than L1 speakers in verb-centered narrative style, vocabulary richness, and adverbial modification, and (2) in argumentative writing, L2 students were significantly weaker than L1 speakers in vocabulary richness. Overall, this study successfully applies MDA to L2 Chinese writing across registers, confirming that MDA can provide insights into L2 Chinese writing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 101204"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-dimensional analysis of Japanese native speakers’ L2 Chinese writing\",\"authors\":\"Qin Xu , Tomoji Tabata , Yu Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Using corpus-based multi-dimensional analysis (MDA), this study investigated the linguistic variation in Chinese narrative and argumentative writing produced by native Chinese speakers (L1) and native Japanese students learning Chinese as a second language (L2). Results of exploratory factor analysis indicated three functional dimensions: (1) verb-centered narrative discourse versus noun-centered abstract informative discourse, (2) richness of lexical output, and (3) adverbial modification. Post hoc multiple comparison results of analyses of variance revealed that Chinese narrative and argumentative styles of writing show significant stylistic differences in Dimensions 1 and 2. Specifically, Chinese narrative writing shows a verb-centered narrative style, whereas argumentative writing employs an overall noun-centered abstract information style, and the vocabulary richness of the former style was significantly lower than that of the latter. The following significant differences were observed between L1 and L2 writing: (1) in Chinese narrative writing, L2 students were significantly weaker than L1 speakers in verb-centered narrative style, vocabulary richness, and adverbial modification, and (2) in argumentative writing, L2 students were significantly weaker than L1 speakers in vocabulary richness. Overall, this study successfully applies MDA to L2 Chinese writing across registers, confirming that MDA can provide insights into L2 Chinese writing.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Second Language Writing\",\"volume\":\"68 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Second Language Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374325000293\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374325000293","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multi-dimensional analysis of Japanese native speakers’ L2 Chinese writing
Using corpus-based multi-dimensional analysis (MDA), this study investigated the linguistic variation in Chinese narrative and argumentative writing produced by native Chinese speakers (L1) and native Japanese students learning Chinese as a second language (L2). Results of exploratory factor analysis indicated three functional dimensions: (1) verb-centered narrative discourse versus noun-centered abstract informative discourse, (2) richness of lexical output, and (3) adverbial modification. Post hoc multiple comparison results of analyses of variance revealed that Chinese narrative and argumentative styles of writing show significant stylistic differences in Dimensions 1 and 2. Specifically, Chinese narrative writing shows a verb-centered narrative style, whereas argumentative writing employs an overall noun-centered abstract information style, and the vocabulary richness of the former style was significantly lower than that of the latter. The following significant differences were observed between L1 and L2 writing: (1) in Chinese narrative writing, L2 students were significantly weaker than L1 speakers in verb-centered narrative style, vocabulary richness, and adverbial modification, and (2) in argumentative writing, L2 students were significantly weaker than L1 speakers in vocabulary richness. Overall, this study successfully applies MDA to L2 Chinese writing across registers, confirming that MDA can provide insights into L2 Chinese writing.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Second Language Writing is devoted to publishing theoretically grounded reports of research and discussions that represent a significant contribution to current understandings of central issues in second and foreign language writing and writing instruction. Some areas of interest are personal characteristics and attitudes of L2 writers, L2 writers'' composing processes, features of L2 writers'' texts, readers'' responses to L2 writing, assessment/evaluation of L2 writing, contexts (cultural, social, political, institutional) for L2 writing, and any other topic clearly relevant to L2 writing theory, research, or instruction.